similar to: 2.2.2, XFS, ACL, PAM, user/group listing problems

Hi, I haven't been able to find any doco that explicity states whether it is supported, so I am hoping someone out there can answer the following questions: Is it possible for a folder/file in a samba share to have win2k security permissions assigned to it? For example, I want my samba server to participate in an existing Win2k domain. I want users to be able to set their own

Dear All, I wonder if someone could help me with a problem I have on a Linx fileserver with Samba 2.2.2, XFS and NT acls. The situation is like this: On a SuSE 7.3 distribution the 2.4.14 kernel is patched with XFS patches and copiled with support for XFS and acl, as stated on XFS project page at SGI. Further all the XFS binaries are installed. Samba 2.2.2 is configured and compiled with

Hello recently I set up XFS share under samba , and played from Win2K with ACL entries of shared files, and noticed that Win2K never DENY ACL entries , so for example for a XFS file with acl: # owner: a user::r-- group::rwx other::rwx Win2K security tab shows for user "a": Read & exec = <nothing here> Read = Allowed Write = <nothing

I'm running Samba v2.2.5 with ACL support for xfs from SGI on modified Redhat Linux 6.2 running Linux kernel 2.4.19 with xfs filesystem support. Samba is running in domain mode and my PDC is an NT 4.0 SP6 server. I'm using a Win2K Professional (a member of the domain) to test things out. I have no problem setting ACL to a file from the Win2K PC. For example, I allow only Read (RX)

Hi ! I?m currently testing samba-3.0.0rc4 as a pdc with acl-support. The box runs with debian-linux and a xfs-enabled 2.4.22-kernel. I have defined a share which is located on a xfs-partition. (changing acls with setfacl works well) I activated the flag : nt acl support = yes If I now try to change acls, i can open the win2k-acl-dialoge - but changes are not accepted by a "permission

Hello samba guys and XFS guys, I am now using Linux-2.4.5-1.0.1_XFS and Samba 2.2.2. Try to create a samba share on a XFS volume, for example, we create a directory named 'public', and set its default acl on 'public' as 'u::rwx,g::rw-,o::r--,m::rwx', . Under Linux box, try to create a file named 'file_linux' under directory 'public', On Samba client (Win2K)

Hello , the described bellow happens both in samba 2.2.7a and 3.0-alfa22. First bug: As it is easy to check smbd , when asked about ACL entry of a file never sends to the client OS DENY Access Control Entries , only ALLOW. so for example for a XFS file with acl: # owner: a user::r-- group::rwx other::rwx Win2K security tab shows for user "a": Read & exec =

All, For a bunch of good reasons ;), my company thinks of getting rid of our win2k DC and replacing it with a linux RH 7.3 box with samba 2.2.4 or 2.2.5. Before starting working on that, I would like to gather some basic informations. We've got solaris 2.8, linux and win2k clients machines. LDAP: I understand that I need to setup an LDAP server which will replace the win2k Active Directory

Paul, Your samba does have ACLs support built-in. Please check that your system has the ACLs support libraries. Since you are using kernel 2.4.x you need to have the bestbits acls support libraries installed on your machine. Check the documentation for XFS to see how to mount the XFS file system so it has ACLs support. You should manually be able to set POSIX ACLs using the setfacls utility.

Hallo, I have to shares: fstab.conf: /dev/sdb1 /mnt/xfs xfs defaults 0 1 /dev/sdb2 /mnt/ext3 ext3 defaults 0 1 smb.conf: [global] create mask = 0777 force create mode = 00 security mask = 0777 force security mode = 00 directory mask = 0777 force directory mode = 00 directory security mask = 0777 force directory security mode = 00 inherit permissions = No inherit acls = No

Hi ! I would like to setup ACL on my RH7.2 box to be able to set/check permissions on SMB shares (linux-samba and win2k). Which file system type to use: XFS, DFS ? Which one is the best recommanded for my configuration ? Regards. Sabrina --------------------------------------------- Powered by Alinto (http://www.alinto.net) for lavache.com (http://www.lavacheautomatique.com)

For those of you running Gentoo Linux: Be sure you compile your kernel from xfs-sources and not gentoo-sources. Now that I've recompiled from the xfs-sources package, Problem #1 has gone away. One lingering problem: I can't remove 'Take Ownership' or 'Read' permissions away from the Everyone and 'Domain Users' group on files that I create via NT Explorer. Who

Hi, I recently tried to use ACLs with samba. XFS is running, I can set ACLs using setfacl and read them with getfacl, no problem so far. Samba compiled fine with '--with-acl-support'. Now I set up a share with 'nt acl support = yes', put there a file and added an acl with 'setfacl': root@edjo[ACLTEST]# getfacl datei.txt # file: datei.txt # owner: odenbach # group:

hi, I've recently set up a SAMBA/PDC domain controler with LDAP. My homes shares are in a XFS quota/acl enabled filesystem setfacl/getfacl works onto the linux Mandrake 9.2 box well, I mean user with more permissions set into ACL can write to the directory concerned. My problem is that ACL file permissions seems to not be readed by Samba when accessing files with a w2k box. here is more

Hola folks, I've been attempting to put together a test server to see how well Samba 2.2.5 plays with NT domains. I'm running Gentoo Linux 1.2 on a Compaq ProLiant 3000, and my test fileshare is on an XFS partition. The server has successfully joined our test domain and is able to list accounts/groups properly via getent. I am also able to log on to the server using an NT account.

Software: - Samba 3.0 (Stable) - OpenLDAP 2.0.27 - Windows 2000 clients I'd like to impliment full-blown nt-style permissions on my existing Samba (with LDAP backend) server / shares. (i.e. file properties--> security: different groups / users, with different permissions etc. etc.) Now I've dug around and found that this can be supported either via ext2/3 + some ACL patch (anyone got

Hello, We are moving to RHEL 7 with Samba 4, and XFS file systems with ACL turned on by default. We come from RHEL 5 Samba 3 with no ACL activated, on file systems. Initially anyway, we do not want ACL support activated, in order to initially preserve legacy. Our shares will have these directives: force user = dl4ub force group = dl4ub create mode = 0000 force create mode = 0660 directory

Hi Could you list the RPM you have installed dor ACL support ----------------------------------- St?phane PURNELLE stephane.purnelle@corman.be Service Informatique Corman S.A. Tel : 00 32 087/342467

Purpose: Create a File Server that can replace our windows file server. System Details: RedHat 8 Kernel 2.4.18-18 SGI XFS 1.2.0 2 disks 1 for the filesystem ext3 1 for the shares using xfs Most of the threads and articles I read about doing this told me that I had to recompile the kernel for acl support. Then I found a post that mention that XFS has built in ACL support. Which

(Sorry for cross-posting; I'm not on either ext3-users or linux-xfs, but I thought both lists might find this interesting. CC me with any replies or questions. Thanks.) (The last four paragraphs contain the interesting bits. Basically, XFS hath kick-ed the *ss of ext3 under conditions that are, for our company, critical.) Some listees might be interested in some testing I did the other