similar to: Incorrect password or unknown username

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Incorrect password or unknown username"

2019 Nov 14
2
Filesystem does not support posix ACLs
Thanks a lot for the reference how to make the regtest. One last question please, if understand this correctly, the --use-ntvfs isnot available by default when installing the Debian package, so I need to compile samba with --with-ntvfs-fileserver to make the option available? On 11/14/19 8:52 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 07:30 +0000, Ghassan Elrayah wrote: >> Hi,
2019 Nov 14
3
Filesystem does not support posix ACLs
Hi, I am trying to get some integration tests running in CI with a software uses samba4 AD for authentication. So basically I would like spin up a build and provision a samba4 AD with some test users and groups non-interactively and test commits and pull requests against the AD. On 11/14/19 8:16 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 06:19 +0000, Ghassan Elrayah via samba wrote:
2011 Aug 16
2
[LLVMdev] Register Pressure Computation during Pre-Allocation Scheduling
Thank you for the answers, Jakob! That's really informative for someone who is still new to LLVM like me. Please see my responses below. -Ghassan  ________________________________ From: Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> To: Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com> Cc: "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, August 16,
2013 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] Experimental Evaluation of the Schedulers in LLVM 3.3
Hi Renato, Please see my answers below. Thanks -Ghassan ________________________________ From: Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> To: Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com> Cc: Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com>; "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 5:30 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Experimental
2019 Nov 15
1
Filesystem does not support posix ACLs
Hi again, it seems that the configure option (--with-ntvfs-fileserer, --enable-developer) are not available on samba-4.11.2. I get the following error: + --enable-developer --with-ntvfs-fileserver --sysconfdir=/etc/samba/ --mandir=/usr/share/man/ --sbindir=/usr/sbin/ --bindir=/usr/bin/ --without-systemd --with-statedir=/var/lib/samba --with-cachedir=/var/cache/samba
2003 Mar 31
1
dovecot-0.99.8.1 @ old redhat6.2 box
Hi I have some odd problem with running dovecot. Program dies with message in maillog: Mar 31 21:04:02 test-box dovecot: Dovecot starting up Mar 31 21:04:04 test-box dovecot: execv(imap-login) failed: Resource temporarily unavailable Mar 31 21:04:04 test-box dovecot: execv(imap-login) failed: Resource temporarily unavailable Mar 31 21:04:04 test-box dovecot: Login process died too early -
2005 May 30
3
Asterisk install error ...
Hi; It is my first time to use asterisk I have TDM400 wildcard and 4 FXO Modules when I install asterisk an error occurred Chen_zap.c 2772 : error : "zt_event_dtmfdigit" undeclared Can any body help why this error .. Thanks; Ghassan M. Lama' -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2013 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Experimental Evaluation of the Schedulers in LLVM 3.3
On 19 September 2013 17:25, Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com>wrote: > Ghassan: You have made me so curious to try other benchmarks in our future > work. Most academic publications on CPU performance though use SPEC. You > can even find some recent publications that are still using SPEC CPU2000! > When I was at AMD in 2009, performance optimization and benchmarking
2011 Aug 15
0
[LLVMdev] Register Pressure Computation during Pre-Allocation Scheduling
On Aug 15, 2011, at 1:27 AM, Ghassan Shobaki wrote: > One factor that is causing our current register pressure estimate to be off is not being able to properly account for live-in and live-out registers (both virtual and physical). As far as we can tell, LLVM represents live-in regs with CopyFromReg instrs and live-out regs with CopyToReg instrs. However, it looks that in a given basic block,
2012 Jan 15
3
[LLVMdev] -march and -mtune options on x86
I have been doing some benchmarking on x86 using llvm 2.9 with the llvm-gcc 4.2 front end. I noticed that the -march and -mtune options make a significant positive difference in x86-32 mode but hardly make any difference in x86-64 mode. The small difference that I am measuring when the target is x86-64 could easily be random variation, while for the x86-32 target I am measuring a huge difference
2013 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Experimental Evaluation of the Schedulers in LLVM 3.3
On 17 September 2013 19:04, Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com>wrote: > We have done some experimental evaluation of the different schedulers in > LLVM 3.3 (source, BURR, ILP, fast, MI). The evaluation was done on x86-64 > using SPEC CPU2006. We have measured both the amount of spill code as well > as the execution time as detailed below. > Hi Ghassan, This is an
2011 Aug 15
2
[LLVMdev] Register Pressure Computation during Pre-Allocation Scheduling
Hi, We are working on a research project whose objective is developing a pre-allocation scheduling algorithm that achieves the optimal balance between exploiting ILP (hiding latencies) and minimizing register pressure.  A prototype of our algorithm has been implemented and integrated into an experimental version of LLVM 2.9. Our algorithm is based on a combinatorial optimization approach, which
2007 Jul 13
3
username list?
Where/how in CentOS can I get a nice list of all the usernames on the system? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070712/3bd17215/attachment.html>
2001 Feb 23
1
Printing with samba2.0.7
Hi all, I've just install samba2.0.7 on server Tru64. We have one printer HP5Si and others HP4 on the network. Using Samba from our Win95 customer we can print correctly to HP4 but to our HP5si we have the file wanted and one blank page and one page indicated "@PJL RDYMSG DISPLAY=" " ". So we want to suppress these pages. Is there anyone who can help me ?
2019 Nov 14
2
Filesystem does not support posix ACLs
Hi, I am trying to create a build on CircleCi with smaba4 AD. It seems the filesytem doesn't support ACL's, which s3fs requires. I get the folowing error: ?ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix ACLs, which s3fs requires.? Try the mounting the filesystem with the
2001 Mar 15
0
Fwd: Re: win98-samba2.0.7 = Network collisions
looks like you sent this to the wrong person... ----- Forwarded message from JON GERDES <GERDESJ@gkn-whl.co.uk> ----- Envelope-to: mikef@mikef-linux-x86.matchmail.com Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:18:43 -0800 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:17:40 +0000 From: "JON GERDES" <GERDESJ@gkn-whl.co.uk> To: <mfedyk@matchmail.com> Subject: Re: win98-samba2.0.7 = Network
2005 May 31
1
Asterisk compailation Error Chan_zap.c
Hi; It is my first time installing an asterisk PBX system . I do have a TDM400 wildcard with 4 FXO moduls on a PC with 3.0GHZ HT CPU and INTEL 915 moatherboard . Fedora C2 Linux as O.S. and I have the latest CVS astreisk , Zaptel and Libpri downloaded the zaptel drivers installation and configuration seems to be fine and the libpri but when I tried to compile and install the asterisk software
2012 Sep 29
7
[LLVMdev] LLVM's Pre-allocation Scheduler Tested against a Branch-and-Bound Scheduler
Hi, We are currently working on revising a journal article that describes our work on pre-allocation scheduling using LLVM and have some questions about LLVM's pre-allocation scheduler. The answers to these question will help us better document and analyze the results of our benchmark tests that compare our algorithm with LLVM's pre-allocation scheduling algorithm. First, here is a
2011 Sep 26
1
[LLVMdev] Pre-Allocation Schedulers in LLVM
Hi Andy, Please see my in-line answers below. Regards -Ghassan ________________________________ From: Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> To: Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com> Cc: "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 8:02 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Pre-Allocation Schedulers in LLVM On Sep 23, 2011, at
2012 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] -march and -mtune options on x86
Which options are you seeing that cause the largest difference, and on which targets? As Chandler mentioned there has been a large amount of variation in x86 targets, and there are certain optimizations that can be done, on say a Pentium (scheduling instructions which are pairable and non-dependent so the U and V pipelines are saturated without contention, for example) that don't make sense