similar to: Samba checking for smb.conf changes

This seems like it should have an obvious answer, but I haven't seen a clear word one way or the other in the man pages or other documentation that I have read - is smbmount's behavior in any way governed by the smb.conf file? The reason I ask is one of the other sysadmins here has been trying to figure out ways to improve smbfs performance, and he came across the speed.txt file in

Hi, I have a list of mutations, called "mutList", of the form: > head(mutList) Alu 1 AluJ 2 AluJ/F(R)AM 3 AluJ/FLAM 4 AluJ/FRAM 5 AluJ/monomer 6 AluJb It contains about 500 elements and not all of them contain the sequence "Alu". I tried using this code: Alu<-mutList[which(grep("Alu",mutList)==1)] But that simply returned

In BPF, an ADD instruction is defined as a 2 register instruction: 0x0f. add dst, src. dst += src In BPFInstrInfo.td this kind of ALU instruction is defined with: def _rr : ALU_RR<BPF_ALU64, Opc, (outs GPR:$dst), (ins GPR:$src2, GPR:$src), "$dst "#OpcodeStr#" $src", [(set

I've been experimenting with llvm/clang as a user for a while now, but now I'm interested in writing my own backend. I'm also developing the target architecture (maybe to go in an fpga eventually) and I'm intentionally making it extremely simple. I think of it as a narrow microcode, because (for example) performing an add requires a sequence of instructions like: set aluin1 = r1

On 25 March 2016 at 04:11, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > As I understand it, the fundamental property being addresses here is: Are the semantics of scalar FP math the same as vector FP math? TTI seems like a good place to expose that information. If the semantics are indeed different, then the vectorizer would require fast-math flags in order to vectorize FP operations

5-nodes server and 1 node client are connected by gigabits Ethernet. #] iozone -r 32k -r 512k -s 8G KB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread 8388608 32 10559 9792 62435 62260 8388608 512 63012 63409 63409 63138 It seems 32k write/rewrite performance are very

I found adcli a little too late; I plan to use it in the future but for the time being I just deployed 16 VMs using Samba so we’re going to keep that for now! Also, the rest of what I wrote can be disregarded – I figured out exactly why my hosts were failing to authenticate after a period of time. It’s too stupid to admit publicly. On 8/23/16, 3:50 PM, "samba on behalf of Kris Lou via

elbert at host1:~$ dpkg -l|grep glusterfs ii glusterfs-client 1.3.8-0pre2 GlusterFS fuse client ii glusterfs-server 1.3.8-0pre2 GlusterFS fuse server ii libglusterfs0 1.3.8-0pre2 GlusterFS libraries and translator modules I have 2 hosts set up to use AFR with

Hi Andrea, So does this definition make sense for basic blocks with more than one instructions? E.g. how should one interpret a basic block with RThroughput of 2.3? On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 7:39 AM Andrea Di Biagio <andrea.dibiagio at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Field 'Total Cycles' from the summary view simply reports the elapsed > number of cycles for the entire

Hi Andy and all, I have a question about per-operand machine model. I am finding some relations between 'MCWriteLatencyEntry' and 'MCWriteProcResEntry'. For example, class InstTEST<..., InstrItinClass itin> : Instruction { let Itinerary = Itin; } // I assume this MI writes 2 registers. def TESTINST : InstTEST<..., II_TEST> // schedule info II_TEST:

From: Peter Arremann <loony at loonybin.org> > Compiles aren't a great benchmark for a box since its 100% cpu and > neglects memory or disk performance but I had the numbers handy > for that :-) BTW, it is 100% ALU and a major strain on the ALU LOAD. In other words, it's not a good benchmark for even CPU. That's why the 3-issue ALU in the Nx586 on-ward blows the

Hello everyone. I have two linux servers* that each have four directories mounted as SMBFS shares from a Windows 2000 Server. For the most part, this set-up is working great, however, there have been occasional hiccups. Every so often, one of the servers, LINUX-ONE, logs a couple of Samba-related errors. The following is an example: Jun 30 06:30:45 mx-two kernel: smb_trans2_request:

On Apr 8, 2011, at 9:56 AM, NAKAMURA Takumi wrote: >>> 8B C3 mov eax, ebx >>> 03 C1 add eax, ecx >>> becomes >>> 8B C3 03 C1 add eax, ebx, ecx > > In my understanding, twoaddr pass tends to emit such a sequence. Yes, it always does, and the coalescer tries very hard to eliminate the copy. > Though I

Updated my Athlon-xp 6-stable system last night, got an em watchdog timeout for the first time a few hours later, during a fairly high-traffic period. System is UP but does have device apic in the config. Any chance this is the recent race condition? Workaround? ifconfig em0 down, ifconfig em0 up seemed to cure it, at least for the moment. Thanks, Barney Wolff -- Barney Wolff I never

Dear group, Here is my data.frame : df <- structure(list(DESCRIPTION = c("PRM HGH GD ALU", "PRM HGH GD ALU", "PRIMARY NICKEL", "PRIMARY NICKEL", "PRIMARY NICKEL", "PRIMARY NICKEL", "STANDARD LEAD ", "STANDARD LEAD ", "STANDARD LEAD ", "STANDARD LEAD ", "STANDARD LEAD ",

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94637 Bug ID: 94637 Summary: system crash, no messages, GT215, ubuntu 16.04 when running glmark2 for a few minutes. Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical

Pre-nv50 has all sorts of funny requirements for non-copy alu operations, and will bail out of solid fills left and right. Account for that case and fall back to the memset. Reported-by: Andrew Randrianasulu <randrianasulu at gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- src/drmmode_display.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

You believe that SSSD is bypassing Samba entirely and going direct to Kerberos? That’s possible. At the moment, to the best of my understanding, Samba is only being used to join the domain. There are no file/printer/etc. shares happening; this is just basic domain join/membership and keytab generation and after that it’s done. The question was still specific to Samba itself: can I specify the DCs

i trust i am still new in freebsd, after go through all mail and book, = now seem to be more close, i got 3 server and a notebook to play with, = install no problem. cvsup not problem.make buildworld not problem. make = build kernel become,every machine i got different error code 1,=20 1-one got system full=20 2-one showing this sometime=20 > anyone know the best way to be one time success,not

I've updated CentOS 4.0 to 4.1 on several machines (some desktops, some servers). However on my laptop, update is failing with following error just after headers are downloaded: --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.3.4-2 for package: glibc --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.3.4-2 is needed by package