similar to: What am I missing here?

It is obsoleted since Dec 2005. Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang at redhat.com> --- Documentation/ABI/obsolete/o2cb | 11 ----------- Documentation/ABI/removed/o2cb | 10 ++++++++++ Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 10 ---------- fs/ocfs2/cluster/sys.c | 9 --------- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) --- diff

Hi All, Google is killing me here! Scientific Linux 7.2, 64 bit $ rpm -qa samba samba-4.2.3-11.el7_2.x86_64 Is there some trick to mounting an NTFS USB flash drive and sharing it with Samba? I am trying to share an NTFS flash drive with samba. If the drive is not mounted, I can do what I want from Windows 7 and XP on the mount point. I have full access. But, when I mount the stick to the

I have set up Samba so that all users on my small network can read from my one of my Linux shares as well as write to that share. However, when user A saves a file to that share, user B can't open it -- and vice versa. How can I set up samba so that all files written to that share can be read, modified, and deleted by all users? Thanks in advance for an answer to this question.

Hello all, I already successfully configured shadow copy service without a delimiter and regex. But as soon as I try to get this to work with regex, nothing shows up on the win client. My config looks like this: [global] shadow: localtime = yes shadow: sort = desc shadow: format = _%FT%T shadow: delimiter = _ shadow: snapprefix = ^\(monthly\)\{0,1\}\(weekly\)\{0,1\}\(daily\)\{0,1\}$

I've been doing unix sys. admin for nearly 20 years and yet EVERY single time I have to setup samba I have configuration problems. Before we start let's clear up some common misunderstandings: I have googled for the answer. I have spent the last six hours doing so and trying various "suggestions". Most of these suggestions point to solutions involving chown or chmod. These are

I need to mount a samba share as mode 777, so all users can read/write/delete/create. I have this as fstab entry //host/public /mnt/home smbfs auto,uid=user,umask=000,defaults,username=Perkins,password= see, i've had to put uid=user just to get it owned by user user, so i could edit files i put mode=777, but it does nothing. i want to let all users read/write/create/delete

I'm running samba on a local linux server, with a bunch of shares. Over the last several years, this has worked perfectly in our heterogenous network of OS X and Windows. All my windows clients still work perfectly - my users can mount the samba shares and create, rename, move etc files and folders. However, recently (starting yesterday) my OS X clients are unable to rename any sub

Hello. I hope that this is the proper place to ask this. Here is my problem. I have several smbmounts under Red Hat Linux 5.1. They need to be accessed by my apache web server. One of the mounts keeps getting disconnected, but this is not noticed by Linux. So the Linux box thinks that the files under the smbmount are still accessable when they aren't actually mounted. What would be the best

I try to understand how works SMBMOUNT, by reading the man page. Could you please send me an exemple, to help me to understand ? tahnks and bye -- Eric Rapilly, 24 rue des jeaunauds, ROMEGOUX 17250 05 46 92 88 90

Hello all, Since the rsync on Panther many things changed in my professional life. This project is abandoned although it should work. But this you already know. What's new? On my new job I have several servers to administrate. Servers that aren't backed up (sic). So, there's why I'm back to rsync. The backup plan I would like: 1) Client side: PCs running rsync (or

All, I realize from the archive that the sort argument in merge has been subject to discussion before, though I couldn't find an explanation for this behavior. I tried to simplify this to (kind of) minimal code from a real example to the following (and I have no doubts that there are smart people around achieving the same with smarter code :-)). I'm running R 2.15.1 64bit under MS Windows

After some attempt to implement reduce-add in LLVM, I found out a easier way to detect reduce-add without introducing new IR operations. The basic idea is annotating phi node instead of add (so that it is easier to handle other reduction operations). In PHINode class, we can add a flag indicating if the phi node is a reduction one (the flag can be set in loop vectorizer for vectorized phi nodes).

From the smb.conf help document regarding the "message command" field:- >You could make this command send mail, or whatever else takes your fancy. >Please let us know of any really interesting ideas you have. First, my question:- Does Samba do anything in particular with the standard output of the program specified here? What would it take to have it WinPopUp-ed back to the

Hello List, on a windows-pc are files with an EURO-Sign "?" included in the filenames. This is working between all XP and 2000 Clients. But if i try to access such a file from a linux-box, I cannot read this files. I switched to the german charset with EURO Sign but no success. Then i tried the cifs instead of smbfs. But the same effect. Switching to UTF-8 doesn't work too.

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Hi Cong, > > After reading the original RFC and this update, I'm still not entirely sure I understand the semantics of the flag you're proposing to add. Does it having something to do with the ordering of the reduction operations? The flag is only useful for vectorized reduction for now. I'll give

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Xinliang David Li" <davidxl at google.com> > To: "Cong Hou" <congh at google.com> > Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 5:17:58 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Introducing a vector reduction add

From: Cong Wang <amwang at redhat.com> This is a long-standing bug and reported several times: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880035 http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136164389416341&w=2 This bug can be observed in virt environment, when a KVM guest communicates with the host via multicast. After some time (should be 260 sec, I didn't measure), the multicast

From: Cong Wang <cong.wang at bytedance.com> When virtqueue_add_sgs() fails, the skb is put back to send queue, we should not deliver the copy to tap device in this case. So we need to move virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt() down after all possible failures. Fixes: 82dfb540aeb2 ("VSOCK: Add virtio vsock vsockmon hooks") Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> Cc:

Can't mount share on my linux boxes as a regular user. I have no trouble mounting shares as root. This problem occurs on both my linux boxes. All the commands I show I have run as a regular user. Here is all the data I have: smbmount \\\\JHAMMER6\\public /mnt/NetWork/JHAMMER6/public/ -o debug=6 mount.smbfs started (version 2.0.7) Initialising global parameters params.c:pm_process() -

I want to get a better understanding of what's happening between the posix permissions and windows permissions. I start with a Samba 4 AD DC with a share: /mnt/data All subfolders and files have permissions and ownership that look like: drwxrwxrwx. 539 root root 52K May 12 17:50 The Samba 4 Admin and User accounts are not local users on the linux server; they are only AD domain accounts.