similar to: How to figure out underlying failed disk(parttions) and sector(s) position ???

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "How to figure out underlying failed disk(parttions) and sector(s) position ???"

2005 Jun 28
0
figure out underlying failed disk(parttions) and sector(s) position ???
Hi, with being exposed to more and more failed hard disks reports, I've accumulated several questions of the logged messages in /var/log/messages file: like how to identifying failed disks(partitions), where is the exact failed sector(s) on the hard disk, and why badblocks reports OK to the reported disk failure. Let me explained the above with the following several example. scenario #1, a
2007 Jan 05
2
Problem in e2fsck ? read error in journal inode
Hi I'm experiencing some problems on a harddisk (it has crashed for no known reason), and in pursuit of getting some of the data out of the disk I'm learning to use the e2fs progs package. Origianlly I used version 1.38, but after experiencing segfaults in e2fsck -which now is solved, I upgraded to 1.39, but now I have hit another problem (on another partition): The partition was
2002 Jan 05
1
root fs not mounting ext3
I am using SuSE 7.3 compiled ext3 support into the kernel and installed it. All my partitions load up as ext3 except / . I ran tune2fs several times, still doesn't take on the / drive. Most recent dumpe2fs -h show no features on that drive=, I keep going around in circles, removing .journal from / and running tune2fs but it never works for / What am I doing wrong? ( thanks in advance)
2015 Dec 10
0
syslinux 6.03 bug related to rev shadow and scroll bar with vshift
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Emilio Lazo Zaia via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > I thought I've found three bugs on syslinux 6.03: Just to be clear, is this only affecting vesamenu.c32? > (1) With sample config file as is, i.e. leaving commented MENU VSHIFT and > MENU COLOR UNSEL but uncommented MENU COLOR SEL: > > A black "border" is displayed
2003 Sep 18
2
BIG Bug on Linux EXT3 file system, or "/bin/ls" problem?? Please Help!!!
Hi, all, I "found" a big bug either related with Linux Ext3 file system or "bin/ls" command. The problem is: File system is no more than 220GB, but "/bin/ls" reports holding >370GB data! The system is Redhat 8.0, with a Generic Kernel 2.4.20. Any suggestions are greately appreciated. more information can be available upon requests. The following is the
2009 Sep 15
1
Install CentOS on Partition(!)-images as a Xen-guest
Hi! Some weeks ago the "Running Xen"-book was recommended to me on this list. A nice book, but it gave me crazy idea: One of the recommendations (which sounds very reasonable to me) was to have instead of a single file that serves as a disk-image to have to files: one of them (which is mounted to hda1) serves as a partition that holds the data, the other one (which mounts to hda2) is
2002 Mar 31
3
GID and UID on ext3 file system
Hello. Look at this: [sergey@gleam sergey]$ uname -s -m -r Linux 2.4.17 i586 [sergey@gleam sergey]$ mount | grep /home /dev/hda11 on /home type ext3 (rw) [sergey@gleam sergey]$ pwd /home/sergey [sergey@gleam sergey]$ id uid=502(sergey) gid=100(users) groups=100(users),10(wheel),13(news),512(ftpadmin),513(dos) [sergey@gleam sergey]$ stat . File: "." Size: 8192 Blocks: 16
2004 May 20
2
HD Partition Lost??
Help! I am running FC1, with a maxtor 160GB HD installed. Drive is only about a month old. I had just finished moving data from an older HD that was making some funny sounds and throwing some random errors. All was well. Last night we lost power for several hours and 1 machine's UPS/shutdown system didn't power down the workstation. The other 7 in our office did fine. The power
2004 Jan 06
1
[PATCH] possible bug in bindresvport
nfsmount doesnt work anymore for me. This patch fixes at least udp nfs mounts. tcp does still hang. client and server is 2.6. --- /dev/shm/bindresvport.c 2003-12-08 02:33:24.000000000 +0100 +++ klibc/inet/bindresvport.c 2004-01-06 21:05:02.283779072 +0100 @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int bindresvport(int sd, struct sockaddr if (sin == NULL) { sin = &me;
2005 Dec 09
1
Re: Windows apps from windows parttion
I'd have to guess "no" on this one. I believe wine uses it's own registry settings, so for most windows apps to run they need to be configured in the windows registry -- unless they happen to be stand-alone apps that don't require any special files or registry settings (some of these do exist). I'm assuming you'd like to run programs installed on your windows
2010 Jun 04
1
parttioning a matrix corresponding to different levels of y
Sir, I have a problem regarding partitioning a matrix.I state my problem as follows: I have a y vector of length say 1000.Variable y has 4 levels say 0,1,2.Corresponding to each y(response), I have a x-vector(explanatory) as a row of X matrix.Now, I want to partition the X matrix into 3 submatrices say x1,x2,x3 corresponding to each level of y.Is there any function to do this in R or how can I
2005 Dec 12
1
Re: Windows apps from windows parttion
not directories, the contents of the windows registry. I havent yet managed to workout what file(s) this is stored in in win, but you can export keys from the regedit program in win. The majority of programs store keys in /local machine/software/<app name> for these you should be able to export the key folders to a text file and import that into Wine. btw, when I did this I think the
2004 Apr 11
3
About defaults
Excuse me, what did you mean by "certainly wrong: you''re ... to make real physical partition hda1 visible to the domain"? Can we use real physical partition in vbd_list? And what the "cmdline_root" should be? Thanks. Xiaofang > vbd_list = [ (''phy:hda1'',''sda1'',''w''),
2013 Feb 04
1
Does btrfs adapt to size changes of underlying block device(s)?
Hello, I''ve got a quick question: Does btrfs adapt to size changes of the underlying block device(s)? My specific situation is as follows: I''ve got a luks-volume on which I want to put btrfs. If this luks-volume grows in the future (i.e. by ''cryptsetup resize''), will btrfs automatically (and reliably) "see" this and be able to use the additional
2003 Nov 12
2
CircStats reveals underlying R bug?
circ.plot in CircStats under R 1.8.0 yields incorrect plots (easily compare hist() and rose.diag()). However, the code in circ.plot has not changed. Has anyone tracked this down yet?
2017 Jul 11
0
Upgrading Gluster revision (3.8.12 to 3.8.13) caused underlying VM fs corruption
> > You should first upgrade servers and then clients. New servers can > understand old clients, but it is not easy for old servers to understand new > clients in case it started doing something new. But isn't that the reason op-version exists? So that regardless of client/server mix, nobody tries to do "new" things above the current op-version? He is not changing mayor
2006 Jun 26
0
[klibc 13/43] UML: the klibc architecture is the underlying architecture
On UML: the klibc architecture is the underlying architecture, so set KLIBCARCH to SUBARCH. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit 018604e070e143657abcf0cb256a1e2dda205d97 tree 1b853903ca6af49d9f437cfd694aec61ef1d488e parent baacd5d81ff7151e8df3893850ec363441886a1e author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Mon, 15 May 2006 21:25:33 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin
2015 Jan 02
0
[PATCH 2/2] virtio: don't free memory until the underlying struct device has been released
When releasing a virtio device, We can't free a struct virtio_device until the underlying struct device has been released, which might not happen immediately on device_unregister() even if that was the device's last reference. Instead, free the memory only once we know the device is gone in the release callback. Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin at oracle.com> ---
2015 Jan 04
0
[PATCH 2/2] virtio: don't free memory until the underlying struct device has been released
On 01/04/2015 06:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 02:47:40PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: >> > When releasing a virtio device, We can't free a struct virtio_device until the >> > underlying struct device has been released, which might not happen immediately >> > on device_unregister() even if that was the device's last reference.
2015 Jan 02
0
[PATCH 2/2] virtio: don't free memory until the underlying struct device has been released
When releasing a virtio device, We can't free a struct virtio_device until the underlying struct device has been released, which might not happen immediately on device_unregister() even if that was the device's last reference. Instead, free the memory only once we know the device is gone in the release callback. Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin at oracle.com> ---