similar to: [Q] Is errors=panic safe to use, and will it detect a RAID gone psycho?

I wonder what psycho-acoustic model is used in ogg vorbis. Did they create their own model (this requires big listening tests) ? Or is it something that was already there, like gpsycho ? <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org'

Hi everyone, For those who like to play with experimental stuff, I've got something new to test. If you compile with --enable-vorbis-psy , Speex uses a variant of the Vorbis psycho-acoustic model to shape the coding noise. So far, I've obtained a slight increase in quality, but I'm interested in feedback from others. This still needs a lot of tuning and has received only a minimal

> Hi everyone, > > For those who like to play with experimental stuff, I've got something > new to test. If you compile with --enable-vorbis-psy , Speex uses a > variant of the Vorbis psycho-acoustic model to shape the coding noise. > So far, I've obtained a slight increase in quality, but I'm interested > in feedback from others. This still needs a lot of tuning

> Does anyone have an idea about the possibility to apply psychoacoustic > models as the ones in mp3 or AAC to a CELP coder? Thanks! > /Pontus This is (sort of) done in the decoder with the optional perceptual filtering. Speex tries to shape the noise so that it sounds more pleasant, I believe. To really use perceptual coding, one would require fine granular control over quantization

>> When enabling and compiling this with mingw on Win32, my debugger >> complains about heap overruns when calling speex_encoder_destroy(). This >> could be a mingw issue though, as I also found a stackalignment bug which >> prevents me from _USING_SSE (apparantly -mpreferred-stack-size is just >> "prefered" and therefore ignored... *Sigh*). > > Just

Happy new year all! I have had a few issues with this sort of stuff- you could adjust NB_ENC_STACK or SB_ENC_STACK (which ever you may be fiddling with) and see if the problem goes away- could be the allocation for the vorbis psy tables takes up more space than the current stack size allows (not sure how allocated? Could be your settings for supporting alloca/etc. are set different than jm,

Hi Tom, None of the new code depends on the stack allocator, but I just fixed an off-by-one overflow on the heap. Maybe that was the error and your debugger is just reporting a wrong offset. Could you try what's in the current svn (you were using svn already, right)? Jean-Marc > I have had a few issues with this sort of stuff- you could adjust NB_ENC_STACK > or SB_ENC_STACK (which

> When enabling and compiling this with mingw on Win32, my debugger > complains about heap overruns when calling speex_encoder_destroy(). This > could be a mingw issue though, as I also found a stackalignment bug which > prevents me from _USING_SSE (apparantly -mpreferred-stack-size is just > "prefered" and therefore ignored... *Sigh*). Just so I understand, the

Hi, Does anyone have an idea about the possibility to apply psychoacoustic models as the ones in mp3 or AAC to a CELP coder? Thanks! /Pontus <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the

(This is almost out of topic but anyway...) It is surprising how little research effort have been put into psy-acou models for CELP. The basic problem lies in that it is not easy to alter the LP model without distroying the minimum-phase property (ie. the stability of the predictor). That leaves us with psy-acou modelling of the noise-part only. However, my own research is in constrained

Hi. I'm an undergraduate linguistics major and computer science minor at the University of Colorado in Boulder, and am taking a couple classes this semester which give me the opportunity to do a research project - one on introductory acoustics in the physics department, and one in the linguistics department on phonetics and phonology. I've got an idea, but I'd like to hear from anyone

Maurice R Volaski via rsync <maurice.volaski at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have an rsync script that it is copying one computer (over ssh) > to a shared CIFS mount on Gentoo Linux, kernel 6.3.4. The script > runs for a while and then at some point quits knocking my ssh > session offline on all terminals and it blocks ssh from being able > to connect again. Even restarting

I made a filesystem (mke2fs -j) on a logical volume under kernel 2.6.20 on a 64-bit based system, and when I try to mount it, ext3 complains with EXT3-fs: dm-1: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features (80). I first thought I just forgot to make the filesystem, so I remade it and the error is still present. I ran fsck on this freshly made filesystem, and it completed with

Rsync 3.2.7 is running on the Gentoo computer, which doesn't have a version, other than it's "current". I'm running the script from this computer. Rsync 3.1.2 is on the source computer, where the files come from, which is Ubuntu 18.0.4.6. I'm copying to a CIFS share mounted on the Gentoo computer. The rsync scripts are all similar to this one: /usr/bin/rsync -v -a

Folks, >From zfs documentation, it appears that a "vdev" can be built from more vdevs. That is, a raidz vdev can be built across a bunch of mirrored vdevs, and a mirror can be built across a few raidz vdevs. Is my understanding correct? Also, is there a limit on the depth of a vdev? Thank you in advance for your help. Regards, Peter -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Here''s something that might of interest to Mac aficionados: http://tenscomplement.com/z-410-storage-main-features -- Maurice Volaski, maurice.volaski at einstein.yu.edu Computing Support, Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I created a filesystem as follows: mke2fs -j -O dir_index -O sparse_super -T largefile /dev/drbd/6 Here's the the output from df Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% /dev/drbd/6 475G 33M 452G 1% It seems that ext3 has taken 23 GB, which is about 5% of the total disk size, for itself. Is that right? If that is, indeed, the case, why does df just list 33M as being

Maurice R Volaski <maurice.volaski at einsteinmed.edu> wrote: > Rsync 3.2.7 is running on the Gentoo computer, which doesn't have > a version, other than it's "current". I'm running the script from > this computer. > > Rsync 3.1.2 is on the source computer, where the files come from, > which is Ubuntu 18.0.4.6. > > I'm copying to a CIFS

I have an rsync script that it is copying one computer (over ssh) to a shared CIFS mount on Gentoo Linux, kernel 6.3.4. The script runs for a while and then at some point quits knocking my ssh session offline on all terminals and it blocks ssh from being able to connect again. Even restarting sshd doesn?t help. Rsync has apparently killed it. I have to reboot. -------------- next part

I''ve been experimenting with a two system setup in snv_134 where each system exports a zvol via COMSTAR iSCSI. One system imports both its own zvol and the one from the other system and puts them together in a ZFS mirror. I manually faulted the zvol on one system by physically removing some drives. What I expect to happen is that ZFS will fault the zvol pool and the iSCSI stack will