similar to: FW: SAMBA QUESTION

Sorry about the direct post.... >Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 08:38:39 -0500 >To: "Chris Boyd" <Chris.Boyd@usit.ie> >From: Eric Hines <eehines@comcast.net> >Subject: RE: [Samba] Not able to join domain > >At 04/06/06 08:13, you wrote: >>I've tried that and now I get "Access denied" instead "cannot find >>user". Also I'm

Hi all, I'm having some difficulty passing arguments into lm() from within a function, and I was hoping someone wiser in the ways of R could tell me what I'm doing wrong. I have the following: lmwrap <- function(...) { wts <- somefunction() print(wts) # This works, wts has the values I expect fit <- lm(weights=wts,...) return(fit) } If I call my function lmwrap, I get

Hello, I've been working with "nnet" and now I'd like to use the weigths, from the fitted model, to iterpret some of variables impornatce. I used the following command: mts <- nnet(y=Y,x=X,size =4, rang = 0.1, decay = 5e-4, maxit = 5000,linout=TRUE) X is (m x n) Y is (m x 1) And then I get the coeficients by: Wts<-coef(mts) b->h1 i1->h1

I have this in my rsync.conf [backup] path = /home/$USER/backup use chroot = no monge symlinks = no uid = wendell gid = wendell read only = no list = yes auth users = wendell secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secrets But rsync doesn't seem to interpret the $USER. I've also tried this with $HOME and '~' with no luck. I want to be able to back up to the

Hi, I am doing double for loops to calculate SDs with some weights and wondering if I can get rid of the outer for loop as well. I made a simple examples which is essentially what I am doing. Thanks for your help! -Young #------------------------------------------------------ # wtd.var is Hmisc package # you can replace the 3 lines inside for loop as # sdx[i,] =

Thanks a million to Wendell Wilson, who offered a solution to the problem we've been seeing regarding saving a document in MS Word. I know we really do need to upgrade to at least 2.2.6, and I am planning it - but this gives us little more breathing room with everything else going on. Once again, appreciate your help! --Gene Original Question: At 04:35 PM 11/14/2002 -0800, I wrote:

dear list, my question concerns the use of `eval' in defining the model formula for `nls' (version 2.6.2.). consider the following simple example, where the same model and data are used to perform unweighted and weighted fits. I intentionally used very uneven weights to guarantee large differences in the results #================================CUT=========================== ln

2 days ago I asked this on r-help, but no luck... since this is actually a programming question, I post it here again: my question concerns the use of `eval' in defining the model formula for `nls' when performing weighted fits. (I use version 2.6.2., but according to NEWS there were no changes to `nls' in 2.7.0, so the problem is still present). in this scenario their

I could use some help understanding how nls parses the formula argument to a model.frame and estimates the model. I am trying to utilize the functionality of the nls formula argument to modify garchFit() to handle other variables in the mean equation besides just an arma(u,v) specification. My nonlinear model is y<-nls(t~a*sin(w*2*pi/365*id+p)+b*id+int,data=t1,

I could use some help understanding how nls parses the formula argument to a model.frame and estimates the model. I am trying to utilize the functionality of the nls formula argument to modify garchFit() to handle other variables in the mean equation besides just an arma(u,v) specification. My nonlinear model is y<-nls(t~a*sin(w*2*pi/365*id+p)+b*id+int,data=t1,

I could use some help understanding how nls parses the formula argument to a model.frame and estimates the model. I am trying to utilize the functionality of the nls formula argument to modify garchFit() to handle other variables in the mean equation besides just an arma(u,v) specification. My nonlinear model is y<-nls(t~a*sin(w*2*pi/365*id+p)+b*id+int,data=t1,

I think there are two bugs in aov() that shows up when the right hand side of `formula' contains both `-1' and an Error() term, e.g., aov(y ~ a + b - 1 + Error(c), ...). Without `-1' or `Error()' there is no problem. I've included and example, and the source of aov() with suggested fixes below. The first bug (labeled BUG 1 below) creates an extra, empty stratum inside

I expected, that I will get the same prediction, if I multiply the weights for all classes with a constant factor, but I got different results. Please look for the following code. > library(e1071) > data(Glass, package = "mlbench") > index <- 1:nrow(Glass) > testindex <- sample(index, trunc(length(index)/5)) > testset <- Glass[testindex, ] > trainset <-

I believe you are right, but can you please explain why anyone would want to fit this model? It differs only in the coding from aov(y ~ a + b + Error(c), data=test.df) and merely lumps together the top two strata. There is a much simpler fix: in the line if(intercept) nmstrata <- c("(Intercept)", nmstrata) remove the condition (and drop the empty stratum later if you

Hi All, I am trying to use a neural network for my work, but I am not sure about my approach to select a parsimonious model. In R with nnet, the IAC has not been defined for a feed-forward neural network with a single hidden layer. Is this because it does not make sens mathematically in this case? For example, is this pseudo code sensible? Thanks in advance for your help. I am sorry if this

Hi, I have a quick statistics-related question. I would like to perform a comparison of means across treatments using a linear model framework. However, my 'baseline' treatment has many more observations than either of the other two treatments and the variance within each treatment is different. Furthermore, each observation is assigned a weight-- where weights within a treatment sum

I am trying to run the following function (a hierarchical bayes linear model) and receive the error in solve.default. The function was originally written for an older version of SPlus. Can anyone give me some insights into where the problem is? Thanks R 2.4.1 on MAC OSX 2mb ram Mark Grant markg at uic.edu > attach(Aspirin.frame) > hblm(Diff ~ 1, s = SE) Error in solve.default(R, rinv)

All: I am new to R and would like your help in identifying the appropriate process to follow in order to modify the output from an existing package. I've had difficulty finding an answer online, perhaps because I am using incorrect terminology. A package that I am using (mmlcr) invokes another package (multinom). An output of multinom is the standard errors, but this output is not

I need help on calling the svydesign function in the survey package (although this error appears not to be specific to svydesign). I am passing parameters incorrectly but am not sure how to correct the problem. ## Call the main function PS.sim (one of mine). The dots are parameters I omitted to simplify the question. ## y.col, str.col, clus.id, and PS.col are names of columns in the object pop.

R-users E-mail: r-help@r-project.org I have a quenstion on "gam()" in "gam" package. The help of gam() says: 'gam' uses the _backfitting algorithm_ to combine different smoothing or fitting methods. On the other hand, lm.wfit(), which is a routine of gam.fit() contains: z <- .Fortran("dqrls", qr = x * wts, n = n, p = p, y = y *