Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "OH DEAR! - RE: 2.2.2 runaway SMBD process"
2001 Nov 17
3
2.2.2 runaway SMBD process
Hello,
I am running Samba 2.2.2 with acl-0.7.16 on RedHat 6.2 (2.2.19). The PDC is
a Windows 2000 Server and the Samba server is a domain member using Winbind.
All the workstations are Windoze 2000 Pro with SP2.
Everything seemingly works fine but every day or two I get a runaway SMBD
process which hogs the CPU and becomes unkillable. The only resolution is
to reboot the server completely.
2001 Nov 29
1
(no subject)
Hi Alexander,
Not sure if this of any help, but we had a similar problem with runaway
SMBDs and what seemed to be oplocks. We are running RH6.2 with 0.7.26 ACLs.
After much messing around and hassling Jeremy, I eventually changed the
kernel from 2.2.19 to 2.2.20 and recompiled everything from scratch. Since
then we have not had one of these rogue processes.
I think Jeremy was right when he
2001 Nov 29
1
locking ? problems (follow up to: strange problems)
Hi all, Jeremy,
after trying to add kernel oplocks = no I got the same errors as describes
in my last post.
(samba working, but some folders not accessible, even not from commandline
unix, can't kill smbd processes......)
This is what happens in the log file:
any ideas ?
[2001/11/29 16:13:00, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(610)
pc08ust (10.21.1.8) connect to service exchangejg99 as
2004 Jul 20
2
LOGIC ERROR in smbd locks system...
Hello,
i have a little problem here:
Using Samba 2.2.2 with IBM ClearCase (2003) on a Sun Solaris 8 machine (2
cpus, 4G ram) (IBM does not support Samba 3.0 with Clearcase, maybe Samba
3.0 will fix the problem, but not able to test it yet). There are more than
100 smbd processes running in average. Load average of the maschine: under
1.0 in normal operation.
But from time to time there are
2006 Mar 07
0
runaway process in 3.0.21b
Hi!
I'm running 3.0.21b on OpenBSD 3.8-stable (i386) with raidframe. Without any
apparent cause one of the smbd child processes has started to badly leak
memory (approx. 10Mb / minute) and possibly busy waiting, persistant across
reboots. The server has been running flawlessly in production for over three
months and absolutely nothing has changed on the server since it went into
production.
2006 Apr 03
0
request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-16-proto-9
Any help about this error on domU ?
request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-16-proto-9
request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-16-proto-9
request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-16-proto-9
request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-16-proto-9
request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-16-proto-9
I am using xen_changeset : Sat Apr 1 14:59:12 2006 +0100
2006 Apr 03
0
request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-16-proto-9
Any help about this error on domU ?
request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-16-proto-9
request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-16-proto-9
request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-16-proto-9
request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-16-proto-9
request_module: runaway loop modprobe net-pf-16-proto-9
I am using xen_changeset : Sat Apr 1 14:59:12 2006 +0100
2005 Aug 30
0
Xen 2.0.7 , amd64 (32 bit mode) lvm partition: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c
Hi i''m trying to run Xen on my amd64. Installed is
Debian 3.1 sarge i386 and Xen 2.0.7, my whole enviroment
is 32 bit.
When i''m running a xenU domain and use /var/xen/samba
as a ext2 fs file ( file:/var/xen/samba,hda1,w ) everything
goes according to plan.
If i use my LVM partition ( phy:/dev/xen/samba-ha,hda1,w )
it gives during boot:
--------
...
NET:
2007 May 01
2
Runaway MOH/mp3123 process?
Has anyone noticed a problem with runaway mpg123 processes for
music-on-hold eating up ~100% CPU and driving the load on the
machine way up?
I've seen this problem consistently with multiple Asterisk
installs, 1.2.x and 1.4.x, although admittedly it was more
common with 1.2.x as far as I can tell.
There is no clearly identifiable sequence of events that causes
this to occur, although it
2009 Dec 29
6
Runaway problem
Hello,
I installed correctly this game in wine but i can't to play because i have an error message when i launch the game.
The error message told me that the game doesn't found this file : DATAVA02.001
But, this file is in the installation folder (.wine/drive_c/Program Files/PENDULO Studios/RUNAWAY - A road adventure/Datav/]DATAVA02.001)
This is the error message in the console :
Code:
2003 May 05
1
0.99.9.1 - Runaway imap-login process
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND
32116 dovecot 19 0 1464 1464 1212 R 99.9 0.1 60:58 0
imap-login
service dovecot stop
ps -ef |grep imap-login |grep -v grep
dovecot 32116 1 98 01:27 ? 01:01:33 imap-login
/etc/dovecot.conf:
auth_userdb = passwd
uth_passdb = pam
I think this was triggered while I attempted to login to IMAP with the
2003 Sep 06
1
Runaway SMBD process
I just updated my cvs sources and recompiled now when any windows box
logs in my smbd daemon goes crazy. I am enclosing the top command I
just ran on the server as well as the output from ps. At this time only
one windows box has logged in (it was win xp sp1). I have more daemons
running than I would expect as well.
-- top
20:51:22 up 1:23, 10 users, load average: 1.14, 3.40, 5.48
121
2002 Jan 15
1
Oplock problems under high load
Hello, all.
I'm using Samba 2.2.2 at my FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE server, and have next
problems:
There is pool of W2K machines, each starting compilation job (usually 2
at one dual CPU machine).
Then these jobs trying to simultaneously access sources, located at
Samba server, appear problems.
Then I running 2 compilation threads from single machine - there is no
problems.
For jobs error seems
2002 Jul 04
1
runaway smbd processes
Hi,
I have a problem with the followig configuration. If anyone can shed some
light on it I would be very grateful!
Solaris 8
Samba 2.2.4 running via inetd
NT 4.0
users access data and their own home directories stored on Unix from,
mainly, NT PCs
Not all, but some users end up with multiple smbd processes.
Every now and again, one smbd process (normally belonging to one of about 3
users)
2008 Jun 25
2
Runaway 2 fails to run
I'm trying to play Runaway - The Dream of the Turtle under Wine. The game is listed as platinum in the AppDB, so I didn't expect a lot of problems. However, when I try to run it I get this in terminal and nothing else happens:
Code:
fixme:ntoskrnl:KeInitializeTimerEx 0x1110e0 0
fixme:ntoskrnl:IoAllocateMdl stub: 0x111700, 5, 0, 0, (nil)
fixme:reg:GetNativeSystemInfo (0x33a13c) using
2004 Jan 27
0
runaway smbd hogging system & ethernet cable bandwidth
Greetings all;
I've probably got something miss-configured, but I have an
intermittent smbd problem, where it will use 15% or so of this
machine and nearly all the much slower firewall box.
I'll try to give enough data here, so my apologies about the length of
this post.
The installed samba versions on this very heavily patched RH8.0
machine are:
---
[root@coyote root]# rpm -qa|grep
2006 Jan 07
0
runaway loop modprobe
All,
When starting guest domain (installed with "yum -c ...Base"), I''m getting this error 5 times and then my guest domain always hung:
"request_module: runaway loop modeprobe net-pf-1"
Anyone seen this before?
Thanks,
Dicson
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2004 Aug 06
0
Runaway icecast again (more YP issues)
> maybe if someone from the same IP tries to add a server to the list
> with same URL you could drop the old entry and list the new one "ad
> hoc"?
or list them as a cluster, if the other mount is still active.
<p>Dave St John
Mediacast1 Administration
(720) 641-7586
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Neufeind" <stefan@neufeind.net>
To:
2002 Oct 15
2
Runaway samba processes
Hi,
I need some help!
We have Samba 2.2.5 running on AIX 4.3.3. The server is a very heavy
duty server, and has 3 main shares, which are very large.
The problem is that after a few days of running, the server suddenly
stops killing off newly spawned smbd processes. They do not die, even
when the original smbd process is killed. They will respond to a kill
-9, but killing off the main PID
2002 Mar 21
4
ExitThread won't.
Okay, so with complete lack of any other ideas, I tried to
figure out what was wrong with my app (Proxomitron), which
is leaving unkillable processes around.
So I went into ExitThread, and added something like:
DPRINTF("%08lx:Exiting thread...(%d)\n", GetCurrentThreadId(),getpid());
exit(code);
right at the top of the function.
And, lo and behold, the processId matches the