similar to: Determine available disk space for Win 95

Hi, I have RH6.2 with kernel 2.4.1smp, create file 2GB on the ext2fs not problem, but copy datafile>2GB over smb not function:( , where is mistake ? thank you jirka

Hello, Dr. Viechtbauer. I am trying to perform a meta-analyis on a group of before-after studies using Metafor. I read your webpage including your correspondence with Dr. Dewey (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2012-April/308946.html), who also conducted a similar study. These information is very hepful, but I have one additonal question which I wonder if you can give me some instruction.

Hi folks, I've been running icecast-2.3.99.3 in production since it was released. It solved a problem of the icecast process terminating from time to time and appears quite stable. In the process of moving to new servers I noticed beta 4 and compiled it for FreeBSD 10 on a dell poweredge. I have been unable to get the administrative interface working properly. You can view

This is to announce the release of Icecast 2.4 beta5 (aka 2.3.99.5). We're looking forward to testing and feedback. As this is a beta release please discuss it on the icecast-dev mailing list. (Please do NOT cross-post to both lists, do NOT reply to the icecast mailing list, PLEASE reply to icecast-dev at xiph.org only). * Updated web interface to be fully XHTML compliant and mobile

This is to announce the release of Icecast 2.4 beta5 (aka 2.3.99.5). We're looking forward to testing and feedback. As this is a beta release please discuss it on the icecast-dev mailing list. (Please do NOT cross-post to both lists, do NOT reply to the icecast mailing list, PLEASE reply to icecast-dev at xiph.org only). * Updated web interface to be fully XHTML compliant and mobile

In help(gc) I read, "...the primary purpose of calling 'gc' is for the report on memory usage". What memory usage does gc() report? And more importantly, which memory uses does it NOT report? Because I see one answer from gc(): used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) max used (Mb) Ncells 14875922 794.5 21754962 1161.9 17854776 953.6 Vcells 59905567 457.1 84428913 644.2

When copying a raw KVM image to my usb drive I got a lseek error...why is this? localhost temp # lr /kvm_guests/newInstall.img? -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10G Oct 22 05:36 /kvm_guests/newInstall.img localhost temp # localhost temp # cp /kvm_guests/newInstall.img . ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cp: cannot lseek `./newInstall.img': Invalid argument localhost temp # df -h Filesystem ? ? ?Size ?Used Avail

I recently started using R 2.14.0 on a new machine and i am experiencing what seems like unusually greedy memory use. It happens all the time, but to give a specific example, let's say i run the following code -------- for(j in 1:length(files)){ load(file.path(dump.dir, files[j])) mat.data[[j]]<-data } save(abind(mat.data, along=2), file.path(dump.dir, filename)) ---------

HI, I am trying to find out why an old slower machineis faster than a new faster machine. I have a RedHat 6.2 server installation, it runs samba and I have been very happy with it. Filesystem is:- [darryl@keg darryl]$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda6 1.2G 735M 387M 66% / /dev/hda1 40M 3.0M 35M 8% /boot /dev/hdc1

Hi folks, For unknown cause I encounter following mounting problem; # /mnt/hda8 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda8, missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so # dmesg | tail via82cxxx: timeout while reading AC97 codec (0x9A0000) via82cxxx: timeout while reading AC97 codec (0x9A0000)

I have a Linux box (Pentium III processor, 256M RAM) running kernel version 2.4.3, and smbmount version 2.0.7. The Linux box has a Windows 2000 Server share mounted via "mount -t smbfs ...". I am running into what seems to be a cacheing problem. I am doing software development on this share, editing the files from a Win98 workstation, and compiling on the Linux box. However,

I have a DL360 with dual 1266MHz processors, 2GB memory, and two 18.2 GB hard drives mirrored using the integrated controller. Partitions are formatted as ext3. I have noticed that the backup is up to 10 times slower than similar systems we have using ext2 instead of ext3. I am not utilizing any of the journaling capabilities of the filesystem. In addition, I have tried to upgrade the kernel

Hi guys: First post for me on this list. THE PROBLEM =========== I have several linux servers (ranging from Redhat 7.3 to FC3) that use Rsync (version 2.6.8 and 2.6.7, read on for reasons) to backup their data. A typical rsync backup script looks like this: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ #!/bin/sh RSYNC_PASSWORD=<PASSWORD> rsync

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking

Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- AUTHORS | 17 ++++++ README | 10 +++ conf/ovirt-agent | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-db-omatic | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-host-browser | 12 ++++