Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "a comparison of ext3, jfs, and xfs on hardware raid"
2009 Dec 24
6
benchmark results
I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a
few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few
generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs.
All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them.
Here are the results, no graphs - sorry:
http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/
Reiserfs
2009 Dec 24
6
benchmark results
I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a
few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few
generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs.
All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them.
Here are the results, no graphs - sorry:
http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/
Reiserfs
2008 Feb 14
2
btrfs v0.11 & btrfs v0.12 benchmark results
Hi,
I've recently benchmarked btrfs v0.11 & v0.12 against ext2, ext3, ext4,
jfs, reiserfs and xfs.
OS: Ubuntu Hardy
Kernel: 2.6.24(-5-server)
Hardware:
---------
Fu-Si Primergy RX330 S1
* AMD Opteron 2210 1.8 GHz
* 1 GB RAM
* 3 x 73 GB, 3Gb/s, hot plug, 10k rpm, 3.5" SAS HDD
* LSI RAID 128 MB
Fu-Si Econel 200
* Intel Xeon 5110
* 512 MB RAM
2010 Sep 10
11
Large directory performance
We have been struggling with our Lustre performance for some time now especially with large directories. I recently did some informal benchmarking (on a live system so I know results are not scientifically valid) and noticed a huge drop in performance of reads(stat operations) past 20k files in a single directory. I''m using bonnie++, disabling IO testing (-s 0) and just creating, reading,
2007 Nov 26
4
Filesystem for Maildir
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font size="-1"><font face="Verdana">Hi all,<br>
<br>
In last year, i had made some research and benchmarks based on CentOS 4
to know which filesystem is better for
2008 Oct 01
1
JFS in CentOS
Hello all,
I'm relatively new to CentOS, but I've been using linux as my main
operating system on both the desktop and server ends for the past 4 years.
I currently have a PIII server with two 160GB IDE hard drives in it, in
a virtual RAID 1 array. At the time of installation, the only FS choices
for the largest partition, 120GB, were ext2 and ext3. I chose ext3, but
now am wishing
2017 Oct 26
2
kmod-jfs on Centos 6
On October 26, 2017 6:31:04 PM EDT, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:11 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote:
>
>> On 04/18/2017 12:54 PM, H wrote:
>> > A couple of days ago I submitted a request to ElRepo and kmod-jfs
>is
>> now available for CentOS 7 as well.
>> >
>>
>> Did not have a need to
2017 Oct 26
2
kmod-jfs on Centos 6
On 04/18/2017 12:54 PM, H wrote:
> A? couple of days ago I submitted a request to ElRepo and kmod-jfs is now available for CentOS 7 as well.
>
> On 04/12/2017 12:58 AM, H wrote:
>> Thank you, installed it and it worked fine. Now I am looking for the same for CentOS 7... It did not look like you have that in your repository?
>>
>>
>> On 3/13/2017 1:09 PM, Nux!
2020 Sep 25
2
JFS for CentOS 7
On 09/15/2020 08:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote:
>> I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the latest version of jfs module but kmod-jfs does not seem to be available.
>>
>> Is anyone running it on the current version of CentOS?
2020 Sep 15
2
JFS for CentOS 7
I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the latest version of jfs module but kmod-jfs does not seem to be available.
Is anyone running it on the current version of CentOS?
2003 Nov 30
1
bad performance on 2.4.23
hi,
- big and ugly mail. If you don't like them, delete it now :-) -
I have collected and classified some information of:
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html
And I observed that ext3 performance is worse than previous
kernels(2.4.19...). -ac and -aa are here only as reference.
Complete information is in the upper URL.
dbench: Performance is worse.
dbench (Numbers are in
2017 Oct 27
2
kmod-jfs on Centos 6
On 10/26/2017 08:01 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:17 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote:
>
>> On October 26, 2017 6:31:04 PM EDT, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:11 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 04/18/2017 12:54 PM, H wrote:
>>>>> A couple
2017 Mar 10
2
kmod-jfs on Centos 6
I am a bit of a noob with Linux and Centos but would like to be able to access an old external USB disk formatted JFS by OS/2. I have seen there is a kmod-jfs package on elrepo that ought to work with Centos 6 but am unsure how to install kmods without hosing my existing system...
If anyone would like to be so kind to give me a short how-to, I would be very grateful.
Thank you.
2006 Dec 10
1
Help with Samba+JFS
I have a network server running FC5, with a hardware raid 3 card using 5
drives, as one large (1.2TB) partition in JFS. I chose JFS because of a
recommendation for performance from a MythTV tutorial, but I don't really
know much about file systems and am suspecting JFS to be causing my
problems. I run samba, apache and MythTV on this machine, and there is
essentially only one problem as far
2005 Feb 04
4
Problems with dovecot using Maildir on JFS.
Howdy,
I have dovecot installed on CentOS (rhel3 clone), and I'm using Dag's
dovecot package.
I have postfix setup to deliver to Maildir, in /home.
The /home volume was formatted with JFS.
In this setup, both Outlook and Thunderbird would not show any new mail
unless they were completely shutdown and restarted.
I have moved /home to an ext3 formatted and all is well.
Anyone have
2017 Apr 11
4
kmod-jfs on Centos 6
Thank you, installed it and it worked fine. Now I am looking for the same for CentOS 7... It did not look like you have that in your repository?
On 3/13/2017 1:09 PM, Nux! wrote:
> yum -y install http://mirrors.coreix.net/elrepo/elrepo/el6/x86_64/RPMS/kmod-jfs-0.0-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm
>
> (that's for 64bit, adjust the url accordingly for 32bit)
>
> it won't hose your
2002 Oct 16
2
to compare journalised file systems with Linux.
Lo,
Actualy i'm looking for documents about journalised file system, in
order to be able to compare them self. I need accurate information if i
want to make a good study.
Thoses informations have to permit me to get answer about table like this :
Features \ fs | xfs | ext3 | jfs | reiserfs |
-------------------------------------------------
chattr | ? | Y | ? | ?
2020 Sep 27
1
JFS for CentOS 7
On 09/25/2020 05:42 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:51 AM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote:
>> On 09/15/2020 08:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote:
>>>> I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the
2004 Mar 31
2
tests to see how ext3 reiserfs 3.6 and jfs survive disk errors.
I made some tests to see how ext3 reiserfs 3.6 and jfs survive disk
errors.
The test is simple:
format a partition, copy the kernel source, unmount and and do ?dd
if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdd bs=512 count=100000 seek=30000? to simulate a
disk surface damage and then run fsck.
seek=30000 ? this must be the second half of journal in reiserfs and
ext3, for jfs I don't know
Result:
jfs:
----
total
2017 Apr 18
1
kmod-jfs on Centos 6
H wrote:
> A couple of days ago I submitted a request to ElRepo and kmod-jfs is now
> available for CentOS 7 as well.
>
> On 04/12/2017 12:58 AM, H wrote:
>> Thank you, installed it and it worked fine. Now I am looking for the
>> same for CentOS 7... It did not look like you have that in your
>> repository?
>>
I don't know about this - at home, I'm