similar to: [BUG?] probable underflow on file date on ext2/3 filesystems

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3534 Bug ID: 3534 Summary: probable underflow calculating display width of file name Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: scp

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 14 June 2001 13:05, Rick Sivernell babbled: > Doug > > Educate me please. What is the diff between ext2 & 3. I am using reiserfs > now and do like it. But I do like to have the stuff going, if I can. Be warned, I know nothing about reiserfs other than what I've read. short version: ext3 is a further development of

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 14 June 2001 15:58, Stephen C. Tweedie babbled: > ext3 can do both metadata-only and full data journaling. You can > enable data journaling for the entire filesystem or on a per-file > basis (ext3 uses that functionality internally to journal writes to > the quota files to keep them consistent, for example.) I learn

Al writes: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > If this is the case, then all of the other zero initializations can be > > removed as well. I figured that if most of the fields were being > > zeroed, then ones _not_ being zeroed would lead to this problem. > > Other zero initializations in inode->u certainly can be > removed, but whether it's

Got this bug report for Ubuntu's klibc: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/37528 > In the fstype tool there is a problem if the lower 16 bit of number of > free inodes in a ext3 filesystem happens to match minix filesystem > magic. > > This will cause the system not to boot since ubuntu will attempt to > mount the filesystem as a minix filesystem. I

I have ext2 compiled in the kernel (so i can mount the initrd image), all other filesystems are modules. The initrd image contains aic7xxx, jbd, and ext3 modules. /etc/mtab reports the filesystem mounted ext3 /proc/mounts reports it mounted ext2 /proc/filesystems lists ext3 If I umount other partitions that are ext3 the module becomes 'unused'. The filesystem was created

XFS is the best filesystem. David Weinehall wrote: >On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:33:13PM -0700, Dax Kelson wrote: > > >>On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 09:34, Peter Nelson wrote: >> >> >>>Hans Reiser wrote: >>> >>>I'm confused as to why performing a benchmark out of cache as opposed to >>>on disk would hurt performance? >>>

Can anyone comment on whether or not it is possible to successfully disable the journal of an ext3 root file system prior to reboot? My application is to try and make sure there is no journal prior to installing and rebooting into a system which does not support ext3. I know that as long as the root is cleanly remounted r/o with no journal updates pending, this will be compatible. I'm

Unfortunately it is a bit more complex, and the truth is less complementary to us than what you write. Reiser4's CPU usage has come down a lot, but it still consumes more CPU than V3. It should consume less, and Zam is currently working on making writes more CPU efficient. As soon as I get funding from somewhere and can stop worrying about money, I will do a complete code review, and

Hi, Newbie question here. I've read some about how you can't power down a disk under ext3 because of the journaling writes. I also know I can mount my ext3 partitions as ext2. What about mounting the partitions as ext2 while mobile on batteries? The hard disk would spin down when it wasn't in use (if noflush, etc. has been configured). But what about data integrity when

This patch adds support for swap detection to fstype (to be applied on top of the previous luks patch). The patch is now against klibc's git tree instead of klibc-1.2. Signed-off-by: David H?rdeman <david@2gen.com> -- fstype.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ swap_fs.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) --------------

Richard Hobbs wrote: > > Trouble is... i've been googling this as well, just now, and loads of > people say XFS has the better performance, but loads of other people say > ReiserFS has the better performance. It starts to become a religious argument at some point. > We have battery backed up RAID controllers too, in this new system, and > the systems are UPSd, so on that

Hi there, I installed my mandrake linux 8.1 with reiserfs. I would like to use wine without my windows partition. Now I see the following text in the wine man-page: --- format: Filesystem=<fstype> default: "win95" Used to specify the type of the file system Wine should emulate on a given directory structure/underlying file system. Supported types are "msdos" (or

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 06:00:06PM -0500, Leonard Basuino wrote: > Hope someone can point me in the right direction. I don't know if what I > am trying to do should work or not. > > I have 2 disk images. One is a VM with an ext2 boot filesystem and ext4 > filesystems with the OS loaded. I am amble to guestmount this with no > issue and am able to see the files that are on

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 09:41:52AM -0500, Leonard Basuino wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:37:55PM -0500, Leonard Basuino wrote: > > > I get the following debug info: > > > > > > mount -o /dev/sda1 / > > > [ <time> ] EXT4-fs (sda1): mounting ext2

In data martedì 17 febbraio 2015 13:37:55, Leonard Basuino ha scritto: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 06:00:06PM -0500, Leonard Basuino wrote: > > > Hope someone can point me in the right direction. I don't know if what I > > > am trying to do should work or not. > >

Hi Nouveau developers, We've posted a short document about disabling display underflow reporting on GK104, which is needed due to an incorrect setting in some production GK104 VBIOSes: ftp://download.nvidia.com/open-gpu-doc/gk104-disable-underflow-reporting/1/gk104-disable-underflow-reporting.txt Thanks, - Andy

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:37:55PM -0500, Leonard Basuino wrote: > I get the following debug info: > > mount -o /dev/sda1 / > [ <time> ] EXT4-fs (sda1): mounting ext2 file system using the ext4 > subsystem > [ <time> ] EXT4-fs (sda1): bad geometry: block count 104388 exceeds size of > device (103408 blocks) > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on

fisher.test() gives a very small p-value, which is underflow on my machine. However, the log of it should not be underflow. I'm wondering if there is a way get log() of a small p-value. An approximation is acceptable in this case. Thank you! > fisher.test(rbind(c(10000,100000),c(100000,10000000)))$p.value [1] 0

Dear all, I'm a bit concerned about underflow problems. Such problems typically occur when two almost equal numbers are subtracted. I was wondering if R has any mechanisms for warning users about potential problems, or if any policy has been developed? To check, I just did: > 1.0000000000000001 - 1 [1] 0 > 1.000000000000001 - 1 [1] 1.110223e-15 > 1.00000000000001 - 1 [1]