Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Ugh, Does Interfaces not work?"
2003 Sep 16
0
two potentially troubling posts to full-disclosure
I haven't seen anything about this here and thought I should pass it along.
christopher neitzert <chris at neitzert.com> made two postings to the
full-disclosure list earlier today. They stated, in part:
*****
Does anyone know of or have source related to a new, and unpublished ssh
exploit? An ISP I work with has filtered all SSH connections due to
several root level incidents
2002 Mar 01
2
rsync: dumping core, breaking pipes, not understanding modules - why?
I'm running rsync 2.5.2_1 on two machines - a production server (athlon
1500+, 512mb, 160gb raid array, running FreeBSD 4.4-release) and a machine
I'd like to use as a backup system (a p2/350, 192mb, 90gb, running FreeBSD
4.5-release.) I've got rsync running as a daemon on the production server,
and I'd like to use rsync to back up the key directories on that machine to
the
2003 Sep 26
2
Set context based on CID...
I was wondering if someone might be able to offer a suggestion to me
about how I might go about dropping a caller into a context specific to
their CID. For example, I would like to be able to dial Asterisk from a
specific number (a mobile phone) and have it drop me into a context
other then the one that normal callers receive that has more options
tailored to things I might want to do. I assume
2006 Apr 08
1
text_field behaviour with validations
Hi,
The text_field method sets the class of the field to "invalid" when the object
you specified is invalid (when using validations). This is to facilitate
working with validations.
Is there anything else it does? In a certain non-standard situation I''m forced
to use text_field_tag, instead of text_field. This means I have to take care
of the validations myself as well.
2003 Jun 09
7
Quickbooks revisited
I did testing on generating this report from a 130 MB Quickbooks file.
Locally, 15 seconds. Samba Server, 1:35. Shared off of my win98
Workstation, 2+ mins. I do not understand the reason it is SOO slow. I
know it is a fairly large file. The only explanation I can come up with is
the way QuickBooks is accessing the files. Maybe jumping all around the
file, requiring many operations on the
2003 Nov 07
0
RE: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #1808 - 13 msgs archives gsm of asterisk ???
Hello.
The procedure so that it works you can find in:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Convert+WAV+audio+files+for+use+in+Asteris
k
a the files .wav
chmod 755 file.wav
sox file.wav -r 8000 file.gsm resample -ql
chmod 755 file.gsm
in extensions.conf
xxxx=> xxx,x,playback(file)
Ing Javier Rios
Ing de Proyectos
04167285748
212 2637246 /2637187
-----Original Message-----
From:
1998 Nov 21
0
HELP with browsing and popups (Cont: Get popups)
I've got plenty of messages about "message command". Please don't talk me about
"message command". I have "message command" in my smb.conf. It seems to be
another problem: I can browse all groups in local network but anyone can't
find me in "Network neighboorhood" in Widows 9x.
I can receive popups only from boxes with samba (Linux boxes) and
2000 Apr 28
0
Problems setting up Samba (nmbd) as multi-subnet router
Hi,
i have a network with one machine acting as master router with
2x4-Port-Ethernet-Cards in it - running nmbd!
There are two Windows-Workgroups, WRK1 and WRK2 in each there are
Windows-Exchange-Servers EX1, EX2. In WRK2 the PDC is on EX2, in WRK1 there
is a standalone PDC, PDC1.
Every network is a full 255 IP-Network.
192.168.40.1 WRK1 EX1 (192.168.40.40) PDC1 (192.168.40.42)
192.168.41.1
1998 Aug 05
1
Samba Weird One
Hello all!
I have a strange one that I really need help with: I have samba p8 running
on SCO Unix openserver 5.0.4. The rest of our network is Windows 95/NT 4.0
with our domain called 'SABINMETAL'. One of the NT workstations (named HELM
with a user called steve) was working, but now it is doing the following:
if steve logs onto the SABINMETAL domain, he cannot get to the Unix server
2005 Dec 05
1
Two samba's not playing together
Hi,
I just tried to migrate my NT-PDC to samba-3.0.20b. Everything worked
fine except for a problem with my old file-server running samba-2.2.5
with winbind.
I can connect to and use shares on the new PDC and I can manage users
and groups. But when I try to connect to the file-server I'm refused access.
When I prepared this mail, I remarked that in smb.conf I somehow deleted
the
1998 Nov 23
0
SAMBA digest 1884
Please, remove my registration from your mailing-list.
For weeks I tried everything I could, but without any response!!
I followed all hints found under
http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc
Sincerely
Bernhard Himmel
himmel@warnow.e-technik1.uni-rostock.de
himmel@saphir.physik1.uni-rostock.de
himmel@physik1.uni-rostock.de
> Reply-to: samba@samba.org
> From:
2003 Apr 18
1
ACL Support? Where can I get it?
From what I've read on the list, there does not appear to be POSIX ACL
support for rsync at this time, is this true? There does however appear
to be a patch floating around out there, where can I find this patch.
TIA
-Justin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a
1998 Jun 02
0
samba interferes with NT server
I have an NT4 server as PDC for a domain: WG. Domain members (on 3
subnets) can either log into the domain, or at least access shares from
the network neighboorhood if they don't want to log on. When I boot a
samba server as a workgroup member (I don't log it into the domain)
everything runs fine for about 24 hours; domain or WG members can access
shares on any machine including the
2000 May 02
0
Win2k bringing down SMB
We have a small LAN here with NT4/98 clients. I reformated an NT machine and
poped win2k on it, but as soon as I try to access the network, it takes
over. It can access the samba server fine, but none of the 98/NT machines
can see anything.
Tried originally with 2.0.7-pre4, then i installed 2.0.7 final and
experianced the same problem. Win2k has but to touch the network
neighboorhood to wreck
2002 Feb 18
0
install pb
hello...
i have installed samba 2.2.3a on linux redhat 7.2
i have edited the smb.conf for acces to home directory /home/dv (dv is my
username).
i have added a line to /etc/hosts, this line contains the windows client Ip
address and netbios name
i can ping the windows computer by : ping winCompName
or ping 11.22.33.44 (its the ip)
i can ping the linux computer from the windows computer by :
1998 Jun 20
0
Samba Server Icon diseppearing (PR#7846)
bkruger@mindspring.com wrote:
> Allow me to explain.
>
> Example:
>
> Server NetBios name - SERVER
> Workgroup = OFFICE
>
> The server is working properly from a functional standpoint. If I drop to
> the Dos windows of Win95, and type "NET VIEW \\SERVER. I can use the NET
> command to remap drives, etc. Once remapped, I can see the remapped
> directory
2008 Mar 11
0
PCBSD & X11 ugh
So, I tried out PCBSD on a Dell "DHP" (what ever that is) (made feb '05).
it installs great
but when I run boot it, (FreeBSD comes up fine) teh X server goes into
an infinite loop somewhere.
168 root 1 0 0 148M 6976K rdnrel 0:57 93.85% Xorg
and the screen stays black.
the fan goes onto "tornado" mode and it just sits there.
attempting to send a
1999 Nov 05
1
"break" breaks _outer_ loop -- ugh!
It appears that "break" will break from the outermost enclosing loop not
the innermost loop. Is it a bug or language feature?
Tim
--
Timothy H. Keitt
National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
735 State Street, Suite 300, Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Phone: 805-892-2519, FAX: 805-892-2510
http://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/~keitt/
2002 Mar 04
1
WinXP. Ugh.
I'm sitting here tonight trying to get WinXP to map a printer on a Samba share.
First off, one thing I find disturbing is that XP seems to be aware of
Samba servers. When I open a window to one, it says on the window bar
"Samba 2.0.7 (nameofserver)" *shudder*.
Anywho.
I'm trying to map to a printer, and it seems to take forever and a week to
come up. I've managed to map
2002 Mar 05
0
WinXP. Ugh. + windows 2000 and higher with WINS
I can actually answer this one. Windows 2000 and higher NO LONGER USES
WINS. While 2000 server does still include a WINS server component,
2000 clients no longer (mostly) use them. They now use the active
directory DNS for all resolution instead of WINS. I'm a bit out of my
element, but I've had my WINS get hosed before, and I never knew until
somebody with win98 called and said they