similar to: Getent problem in samba 2.2

Hi! I am facing a very strainge problem. I am not able to do getent passwd and getent group from nt domain. Wbinfo -u and -g options are working fine. But getent is not returning domain users and groups.I tried smbclient -L hostname option also its giving me errror ERRsrv badpw. I don't know how to solve this problem. Please Please help me to solve this problem. smb.conf , enum user and group

This seems to be an excessive amount of cross posting. I'm trimming down the CC list. On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, ncc22, Gecis (CAP, GECIS) wrote: > Problems (Bugs) Faced with Samba 2.2.2 with winbind > > 1. We have installed the samba 2.2.2 with winbind option in Red Hat > Linux Kernal Version 2.4.2-2 on i686. We joined samba server to domain > with smbpasswd option successfully.

You can test if winbind is able to resolve user IDs internally with "wbinfo -u". This uses the samba tool "wbinfo" to connect directly to the running winbind daemon and list all the Windows domain users. If that fails, then you have problems with the winbind daemon itself. The authentication between winbind and the PDC can be tested with "wbinfo -t", which is usually

Hi, I have RH6.2 with kernel 2.4.1smp, create file 2GB on the ext2fs not problem, but copy datafile>2GB over smb not function:( , where is mistake ? thank you jirka

Thank you Andrew, you pointed me in the right direction. Part of what I m doing to try to get Netatalk to authenticate through Winbind was the following: 4) to install Winbind files: cp nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so /lib # this is the major one - solaris nss is different to linux. ln -s libnss_winbind.so nss_winbind.so.1 cp nsswitch/pam_winbind.so /lib/security Once I deleted /lib/libnss_winbind.so

I've recompiled samba 2.2.3a and still any time I do a ls -l in a directory where there are files from a PC I get the error : ld.so.1: ls: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/lib/nss_winbind.so.1: symbol socket: referenced symbol not found If I shut off winbind or take winbind out for my /etc/nsswitch.conf file, I can get a directory listing and it lists the users ID that winbind assigned to

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:33 AM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 10:27 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:51 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On 06/14/2015 08:02 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com>

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:51 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 08:02 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On 06/14/2015 07:36 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com>

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 07:36 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> On 06/14/2015 06:47 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: >>> >>> I actually opened the Virtual Disk Image (.vdi) on >>>>

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:06 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/14/2015 06:47 PM, Animesh Pandey wrote: > >> I actually opened the Virtual Disk Image (.vdi) on http://www.vmxray.com/ >> . >> I could see that despite my disk being of 100GB only ~65GB was being >> shown. >> All the stuff related ot the local user was not visible at

I actually opened the Virtual Disk Image (.vdi) on http://www.vmxray.com/. I could see that despite my disk being of 100GB only ~65GB was being shown. All the stuff related ot the local user was not visible at all. After I restarted my VM, the OS gets stuck here ( http://i.stack.imgur.com/KVYxV.png). Even after trying the single user login it was stuck there. But the emergency mode worked alright.

I'm not really an overload resolution expert, so I could be wrong. Anyway, please file a bug report (http://llvm.org/bugs/), and our overload resolution experts will take a look. :) -Eli On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at gmail.com>wrote: > Actually it should have not thrown error at all. it works fine with gcc. > And the part of code which you

Hi, Structures are passed by pointer, so the return value is not actually in eax. That code gets transformed into something like: void sum(A1 *out, const A1 one, const A1 two) { out->x = one.x + two.x out->y = one.y + two.y } So actually the function ends up returning void and operating on a hidden parameter, so %eax is dead at the end of the function and should not be being relied

Actually it should have not thrown error at all. it works fine with gcc. And the part of code which you mentioned is not getting hit at all. Maybe some difference in parsing is there. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Mayur Pandey <mayurthebond at gmail.com>wrote: > >> for the following

Hi, I have submitted a draft proposal on the GSoC website but I also wanted to share my draft proposal through Dropbox to get your feedback quickly through it. Please review it and let me know your feedbacks as soon as possible. I haven't written much about automated testing as I haven't written any test yet ( I will learn writing automated tests before April end ). Link to my

Problem seems not only with operator overloading, It occurs with struct value returning also. gdb while debugging expects the return value in eax, gcc does returns in eax, But Clang returns in edx(it can be checked in gdb by printing the contents of edx). Code(sample code) struct A1 { int x; int y; }; A1 sum(const A1 one, const A1 two) { A1 plus = {0,0}; plus.x = one.x + two.x; plus.y

This ancient bug was tracked to the acepack library, line 556 in line src/avas.f The troublesome line is: if (x(n).gt.x(1)) go to 30 Since the input arguments are empty, referencing x(1) and x(n) cause a Segmentation fault, and cause R to crash. Acepack author and maintainer Rob Tibshirani <tibs at utstat.toronto.edu> has been contacted with this information. This is not a

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

Hi Mayur, > On 24 Nov 2014, at 07:00, MAYUR PANDEY <mayur.p at samsung.com> wrote: > In the assembly generated with O0, we are getting the "blx" instruction whereas with O1 we get "bx" (in 3.4.2 we used to get "blx" for both O0 and O1). > > Is this because of this patch: [llvm] r214959 - ARM: do not generate BLX instructions on Cortex-M CPUs

Hi, I am working on Centos6.6 on a VirtualBox on Windows Host. Today I started to have booting issues in the OS. It won't get past the loading screen. I checked and found that the files related to the user "cloudera" on the system were not accessible. Only the files related to root were accessible. This is why I was am not able to do a single user login but an emergency login was