similar to: ext3-image doesn't mount anymore and reports errors

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "ext3-image doesn't mount anymore and reports errors"

2011 Jul 12
1
after mounting with -o degraded: ioctl: LOOP_CLR_FD: Device or resource busy
dd if=/dev/null of=img5 bs=1 seek=2G dd if=/dev/null of=img6 bs=1 seek=2G mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid1 img5 img6 losetup /dev/loop4 img5 losetup /dev/loop5 img6 btrfs device scan mount -t btrfs /dev/loop4 dir umount dir losetup -d /dev/loop5 mount -t btrfs -o degraded /dev/loop4 dir umount dir losetup -d /dev/loop4 ioctl: LOOP_CLR_FD: Device or resource busy mkfs.ext3 /dev/loop4 mke2fs 1.39
2005 Dec 21
1
/dev/loopX not released when domU terminates ?
Hello all, I have some DomU''s with root and swap images on files under Xen 3.0.0 Investigating some cases of boot failure of domUs, I stumbled upon the fact that when a domU is shutdown via xm shutdown, not all of its images are released from their /dev/loopX - devices. That is, for i in /dev/loop*; do losetup $i; done still shows output for that image. It seems to me that the
2019 Oct 31
3
[PATCH 1/2] loop: fix loop_info struct
Otherwise, stack can be corrupted resulting in incorrect runtime behaviour. For example, overriding argc from main(). References: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/1850184 Signed-off-by: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson at ubuntu.com> Signed-off-by: Adam Conrad <adconrad at ubuntu.com> Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox at ubuntu.com> ---
2009 Aug 05
2
Unable to start domU because losetup fails
Hi, I have Xen 3.3.1 dom0 on Debian with 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 kernel and I had to "xm destroy" my domU. Now when I try to start it again it fails like this: # xm list | grep n39 # # xm create -c /xen/conf/n39 Using config file "/xen/conf/n39". ROOT xen1:~> Error: Device 4 (vbd) could not be connected. losetup -r /dev/loop1 /xen/iso/amd64-netbsd-6.iso failed # losetup -a
2009 Feb 25
3
HVM Linux DomU doesn''t start
Hi all, we are running two servers with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Server with Xen 3.2 and two dual-core CPUs: processor : {0-3} vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 65 model name : Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2218 HE stepping : 3 cpu MHz : 2613.394 cache size : 1024 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 1 core id : 0 cpu cores : 1 fpu :
2010 Mar 14
0
[patches] klibc review unsorted patch queue
hello hpa, please review this unsorted patch queue, as I wasn't sure about them they didn't land yet in todays pull request. thanks max git clone git://git.debian.org/users/maks/klibc.git test Thomas B?chler (1): klcc: compile shared by default jeremy buisson (1): [klibc] sparc64: fix bad 32 bits socket syscalls maximilian attems (1): [klibc] add losetup utils the
2008 Dec 18
0
oplock behavior of samba 3.2.6 causes corruption of netscape mailbox files, mails seem to be received doubly or triply
Hi guys, we're running a samba server on a sles 9 with sp2. The server hosts the netscape mailbox files for our users in our terminal server environment. There were never problems with these files. After upgrading from samba 3.0.21 to 3.2.6 (sernet-built) the mailbox files of nearly all users got corrupt while working with netscape. We got the following symptoms. The users seem to receive
2019 Oct 31
0
[PATCH 2/2] loop: switch to linux/loop.h
linux/loop.h header is exported by linux, for userspace to consume. This would prevent issues with struct sizes incompatibilities. References: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/1850184 Signed-off-by: Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hudson at ubuntu.com> Signed-off-by: Adam Conrad <adconrad at ubuntu.com> Signed-off-by: Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox at ubuntu.com>
2019 Nov 05
0
[klibc:master] loop: switch to linux/loop.h
Commit-ID: 547b7cf241d4bcf518759d06cff694b9738c57b0 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=547b7cf241d4bcf518759d06cff694b9738c57b0 Author: Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox at ubuntu.com> AuthorDate: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:59:02 -0700 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 00:42:26 +0000 [klibc] loop: switch to
2011 Jan 22
32
Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!
Hi, I wanted to create a new btrfs fs for my backups. When trying to mkfs.btrfs for that device, I''m getting "error checking /dev/loop2 mount status" With strace I see where the problem is: lstat("/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-par", 0x7fffa30b3cf0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) The problem is there is something missing
2011 Aug 14
3
cant mount degraded (it worked in kernel 2.6.38.8)
# uname -a Linux dhcppc1 3.0.1-xxxx-std-ipv6-64 #1 SMP Sun Aug 14 17:06:21 CEST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux mkdir test5 cd test5 dd if=/dev/null of=img5 bs=1 seek=2G dd if=/dev/null of=img6 bs=1 seek=2G losetup /dev/loop2 img5 losetup /dev/loop3 img6 mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid1 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop3 btrfs device scan btrfs filesystem show Label: none uuid:
2008 Jan 24
5
Can''t boot from ISO image...
Hi, I''ve been trying to boot from a RHEL4 install iso without much luck (the xen way). The Host is: RHEL 5.1 xen-3.0.3-41.el5 Here is my guest config: # -*- mode: python; -*- #============================================================================ # Python configuration setup for ''xm create''. # This script sets the parameters used when a domain is created using
2013 Oct 21
11
swapfile on btrfs, temporary solution for wiki
Hello list, i know what btrfs don''t support swap files. I read arch wiki and when i reading about systemd addon for auto create swapfile on btrfs, i invent the way, how create and using swap file, just see following sh code: swapfile=$(losetup -f) #free loop device truncate -s 8G /swap #create 8G sparse swap file losetup $swapfile /swap #mount file to loop mkswap $swapfile swapon
2003 Jun 13
1
jbd count incremented *even* if volume is mounted RO?
Continuing on with my earlier post . . . after looking through code of JBD, is the following perhaps the difference in why the md5 values differ; When a journalled filesystem that uses jbd is mounted the journal b_count is incremented by one? *EVEN* if the volume was mounted read only, this b_count is still increased by one? curious as ever! lt __________________________________ Do you
2008 Dec 26
7
Installing domU from ISO image file
I am trying to install CentOS from an ISO image file but the installer does not see a CD-ROM drive. The VNC viewer works but the CentOS installer indicates "Unable to find any devices of the type needed for this installation type." Then it prompts with "[Select driver] [Use a driver disk] [Back]". I have tried several variations of the "disk" paramater, all
2012 Nov 04
1
syslinux installation problem
Hey, guys. I have a problem when installing syslinux 4.06, and I'd be grateful if someone could tell me how to solve the problem. My task - to install the bootloader on the virtual machine image. The image contains the MBR and the only partition with the file system ext4. The file system contains all the files for the guest OS. To install bootloader into the image of the guest OS, I use the
2006 Aug 21
4
Making DOS/Win9x HD Image for memdisk
Hi list! I'm trying to make a hd image with can boot from memdisk over PXE. So this is what i did: - Created a new VM [VMware] -Installed DOS on a 100MB HD from a floppy -bootet Linux over PXE [DamnSmallLinux] -in terminal: dd if=/dev/hda of=dos.img This image [dos.img] isn't working! Memdisk loads the Image and boots the HD! The error message is something like this: I/O Device
2010 Aug 11
3
Failure when mounting Lustre
Hi, I get the following error when I try to mount lustre on the clients. Permanent disk data: Target: lustre-OSTffff Index: unassigned Lustre FS: lustre Mount type: ldiskfs Flags: 0x72 (OST needs_index first_time update ) Persistent mount opts: errors=remount-ro,extents,mballoc Parameters: mgsnode=164.107.119.231 at tcp sh: losetup: command not found mkfs.lustre: error 32512 on losetup:
2014 Jan 23
2
Advice/directions to users of Syslinux
Hi, Ady: > > > I would suggest not using the work "disk". me: > > I am unhappy with "disk" too. > > But that change would have a much wider scope in the text. Ady: > You can still use a different wording in a linked section. If "disk" > is not the best choice for the new section, then choose a better > term. Two problems: There are
2010 Nov 20
1
[PATCH 1/2] cat cleanup ugly ifdefery
no point in carrying those ifdefs along, just cleanup the code that seems either BSD specific or can't work on klibc. Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <max at stro.at> --- usr/utils/cat.c | 22 +--------------------- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/usr/utils/cat.c b/usr/utils/cat.c index 1108d2e..7465148 100644 --- a/usr/utils/cat.c +++