similar to: Repacking files on ext3?

On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 11:44 +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: > On 23/09/2019 20:41, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 11:25 +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba > > wrote: > > > hi all, > > > > > > I updated a small domain with 8k object to samba-4.11.0 and the > > > database > > > conversion from v1 to v2

On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 11:25 +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: > hi all, > > I updated a small domain with 8k object to samba-4.11.0 and the > database > conversion from v1 to v2 didn't take a noticeable time. > > On the other hand, in a larger domain with 67k object, where the > sudo ./bin/samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix > takes ~40 minutes, 2 hours

hi all, I updated a small domain with 8k object to samba-4.11.0 and the database conversion from v1 to v2 didn't take a noticeable time. On the other hand, in a larger domain with 67k object, where the sudo ./bin/samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix takes ~40 minutes, 2 hours and half were not enough to complete the conversion. Is it a couple of hours something expected if dbcheck takes so

On 23/09/2019 20:41, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 11:25 +0200, Francesco Malvezzi via samba wrote: >> hi all, >> >> I updated a small domain with 8k object to samba-4.11.0 and the >> database >> conversion from v1 to v2 didn't take a noticeable time. >> >> On the other hand, in a larger domain with 67k object, where the >>

For those who have wondered why NFS on EL5 is slower than on EL4 I provide these links for your edification. http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-15355 http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448130 Problem is kernel threads cannot create or assign an io context as there is no api in the kernel available to do so, so each is given a different context and there is an 8ms latency between

Hello everybody, reading about the speed improvements possible with (on boot) preloaded files (which should be continuous on disk) I searched for a ext3 defrag program. I found an ext2 defrag program (http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/system/filesystems/defrag-0.70.tar.gz, available in debian as defrag) which would have an optimal feature (moving files by a list) but refuses to work on ext3.

On Thu, 2018-08-02 at 15:53 +0200, Andrej Gessel via samba wrote: > Hello list, > > I try to repack(tdbtool repack) my "dc=domain,dc=com.ldb" file: > > tdb> info > Size of file/data: 3388084000/1050098055 > Header offset/logical size: 0/3388084000 > Number of records: 669737 > Incompatible hash: no > Active/supported feature flags: 0x00000000/0x00000001

Hello list, I try to repack(tdbtool repack) my "dc=domain,dc=com.ldb" file: tdb> info Size of file/data: 3388084000/1050098055 Header offset/logical size: 0/3388084000 Number of records: 669737 Incompatible hash: no Active/supported feature flags: 0x00000000/0x00000001 Robust mutexes locking: no Smallest/average/largest keys: 12/57/242 Smallest/average/largest data: 72/1510/1235987

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:18 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Chris Murphy wrote: >> DBAN is obsolete. NIST 800-88 for some time now says to use secure erase >> or enhanced security erase or crypto erase if supported. >> >> Other options do not erase data in remapped sectors. > > dban doesn't? What F/OSS does "secure erase"? And does it do

Two files in the different subvolumes may have the same inode id, so The rb-tree which is used to manage the defragment object must take it into account. This patch fix this problem. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/file.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c

Hi, i am experiencing strange boot failures after repacking the ISO image archlinux-2013.11.01-dual.iso without isohybrid and EFI: # mount -o loop archlinux-2013.11.01-dual.iso /mnt $ xorriso -as mkisofs \ -o arch_repacked.iso \ -c isolinux/boot.cat \ -b isolinux/isolinux.bin \ -no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table \ -V "ARCH_201311" \

Hi, first of all, apologies if this isn't the right mailing list but it was the best I could find. If you know a better mailing list, please tell me. Today I tried to defrag one of my filesystems. It's a 3.5T large filesystem that has 6 software-raids in the bottom and then merged together using lvm. I was running ext3 but removed the journal flag with thor:~# tune2fs -O ^has_journal

Kernel 3.1-rc8 btrfs-progs-0.19 mount options: noatime,autodefrag (space_cache is enabled) There are snapshots present on the filesystem. When I do a btrfs fi defrag on a file, the file becomes much more fragmented. The end result can be a file with 20k times more fragments than before. Initially I thought the extents were just smaller but were next to each other, so I checked with both

Hi Everyone, I'm new to * and I'm trying to setup a small configuration of SIP clients. Eventually when I get this working I plan on expanding with a Digium developers kit to add analog phones and PSTN access. My two end points are an Xten softphone and a Mitel 5055 SIP phone. Both peers seem to register with * but I cannot call to one another. When I dial the associated extension, the

Hey folks, Does anybody know if any of these are on the roadmap for ZFS, or have any idea how long it''s likely to be before we see them (we''re in no rush - late 2008 would be fine with us, but it would be nice to know they''re being worked on)? I''ve seen many people ask for the ability to expand a raid-z pool by adding devices. I''m wondering if it

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:12:58PM +0100, Olivier Hault wrote: > For a while, I wonder if it would be possible to defrag guest fs > from the host. I can see two flavors a) offline defrag, b) online > defrag of the guest fs > > I there already solutions of works in progress to support those > operations ? We don't support this right now. However it is certainly something we

Hi all, Fewer days ago a CentOS box server suffered a manual and unexpected reset (too large to explain: there are silly people in everywhere). The result was the system did not mount de root (/) partition and the boot process was stopped. I repair it easily: boot from LiveCD (Knoppix in my case), umount root partition and pass the e2fsck utility. Because of that I've used several fs tools

This commit fixes three issues on non-auto defrag path (defragfs.ocfs2 doesn't set OCFS2_MOVE_EXT_FL_AUTO_DEFRAG on range.me_flags): - For ocfs2_find_victim_alloc_group(), old code forgot enlarge bitmap range for global_bitmap case. Old code could generate negative vict_bit. - For ocfs2_probe_alloc_group(), old code forgot back off move_len when finding enough bitmap space. Old code has

Hi, On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 6:54 PM Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > FYI to everyone: If you have things that you would like to see done > before a merge of Flang, please reply with as many details as you have > time to provide (and if you have things that you would like to see done > soon, but you're comfortable with them happening after

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 03:30 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> I use btrfs on most of my volumes on my laptop, and I''ve always felt >> booting was very slow, but definitely sure is slow, is starting up >> Google Chrome: >> >> encrypted ext4: ~20s >> btrfs: ~2:11s