similar to: Strange delay in syscall close() on a large ext3-filesystem

Sorry of I'm going over old ground ... We are in the process of putting in a Suse Linux OpenExchange Server (SLOX) which at present includes Samba 2.2.5*. We are also attempting to use this as a PDC for XP clients that we are going to be rolling out. Now, everything seems to be going down the pan, and it looks like the problem is that XP has dropped support for 'old style'

Hi, using samba 2.2.5-UL (on a SuSE-SLOX-System) we have to mangle long pathnames to short ones. We need this for some of our apps which generate batch-files (*.bat) for compilation. Normally this works correctly, exept for a directory named "Only_for_generation". This directory is mangled into "Only_~%0" (it' s NULL at the end). And this is the problem. In

Hi all, I have setup a Samba3 PDC and BDC with an LDAP backend to replace my current NT 4.0 infrastructure. This configuration is working fine. I also am testing integration of SuSE OpenExchange and would like to have it authenticate logons via the domain LDAP database. >From my preliminary testing i have found that OpenExchange attempts an LDAP search for some information regarding the cyrus

I am using SuSE 7.3 compiled ext3 support into the kernel and installed it. All my partitions load up as ext3 except / . I ran tune2fs several times, still doesn't take on the / drive. Most recent dumpe2fs -h show no features on that drive=, I keep going around in circles, removing .journal from / and running tune2fs but it never works for / What am I doing wrong? ( thanks in advance)

I have a network where we have a main site with a PDC, and two remote sites with BDCs. The backend is LDAP which is slaved to the remote sites, Samba is 2.2.8a, the main server is part of the Suse Linux OpeneXchange Server, the other two servers are Suse Standard Server 8. What I wanted to do was to have users at the various sites map one drive from their 'local' server. Behind the

greetings. i have been three days now trying to add ext3 to an existing suse-7.3 machine. i am using suse's own 2.4.13 kernel source. here is what i have done: following install, i ran tune2fs -j /dev/hda2 (also hda3 and hda4). .journal files were created on each partition, apparently uneventfully. wishing to avoid ai irreversable situation, i initially edited /etc/fstab thusly:

Hi, I am a new ext3 user and I am having problems similar to what many people are facing on this list. I have done everything as the emails suggest. I am using SuSE 7.3 with the the 2.4.10 kernel and ext3 compiled as a module. Because it is 2.4.10 kernel, I created all my journals from a rescue disk and everything seems to be working right for the non-root filesystems. My fstab has all my

Dear Daniel, Thank you for your email. According to your suggestion, I tried to use the shared memory filesystem for data exchange between the host machine and the container. The steps are as follows: 1) create an empty file in the host machine (/tmp1/file1). 2) run #chmod 777 /tmp1 and #chmod 777 /tmp1/file1. 3) expose /tmp1 to the container by configuring the container with the following XML

nfsmount doesnt work anymore for me. This patch fixes at least udp nfs mounts. tcp does still hang. client and server is 2.6. --- /dev/shm/bindresvport.c 2003-12-08 02:33:24.000000000 +0100 +++ klibc/inet/bindresvport.c 2004-01-06 21:05:02.283779072 +0100 @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int bindresvport(int sd, struct sockaddr if (sin == NULL) { sin = &me;

Hello! I'm the email admin for a reasonably large Exchange/NT system, trying to make a go of a Linux/SLOX replacement as an example of what can be done. Obviously, to do my job I need to run a fair bit of Windows software, and this is where Wine comes in. One of the real biggies is the NT Server Administration tools (the ones provided to run from a workstation) such as USRMGR.EXE and

Samba 2.2.8a on Suse 8 (part of SLOX system - no I can't upgrade until Suse upgrade the system) Windows XP Pro clients Are failed client logins on the XP clients logged anywhere ? How about non-domain member clients accessing shares ? I've been asked to provide a log of failed login attempts with a view to spotting break-in attempts (apparently auditors like that sort of thing). There

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 06:28:46AM +0000, WANG Cheng D wrote: > Dear all, > In my system, two containers need to exchange data as quick as possible > and the two containers are hosted by the same physical machine, I wonder > if socket is the only method for communication between containers? If you have an area of filesystem that is shared + writable to both containers, they could

On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 01:39:03PM +0000, WANG Cheng D wrote: > Dear Daniel, > Thank you for your email. > According to your suggestion, I tried to use the shared memory filesystem for data exchange between the host machine and the container. The steps are as follows: > > 1) create an empty file in the host machine (/tmp1/file1). > 2) run #chmod 777 /tmp1 and #chmod 777

Dear Daniel, As you know, following your suggestion, I can expose shared memory to two containers hosted by the same machine, thus the two containers can exchange data. Now I have a new problem: how does the containers avoid concurrent accesses to the shared memory? In a native system, this can be achieved by using semaphore. But I don't know how the two containers can see the same semaphore.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3527 Summary: rsync: tries to chdir() into a device Product: rsync Version: 2.6.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: philipp.marek@bmlv.gv.at

ACPI_VIDEO keeps causing problems with circular Kconfig dependencies, as it depends on a couple of other symbols, and it gets selected by drivers that may end up being depending on others. This is an attempt to simplify this by changing all drivers that currently 'select ACPI_VIDEO' to use 'depends on'. This by itself simplifies the dependency lists for the other drivers. We make

hi, am starting to play with XEN - the virtualisation project (http://xen.sf.net). i''ll give some background first of all and then the question - at the bottom - will make sense [when posting to lkml i often get questions asked that are answered by the background material i also provide... *sigh*] each virtual machine requires (typically) its own physical ram (a chunk of the

I decided to start using ext3. My kernel 2.4.15p9. I downloaded and build util-linux-2.11m and e2fsprogs 1.25. I compiled ext3 in the kernel. I started converting my filesystems and thing went ok for the first few. I then started getting the following on each additional filesystem. [root@joker /root]# tune2fs -j /dev/hdc4 tune2fs 1.25 (20-Sep-2001) Creating journal inode: done This filesystem

Wim, Thanks for your prompt response on this. The tpmC figures look very impressive, and tpmC is read intensive. I had already read note 236679.1 "Comparing Performance Between RAW IO vs OCFS vs EXT2/3" which I guess is the article to which you are referring; it made me suspect that the poor performance was due to the lack of an OS IO cache but I wasn't sure. The database is

Wim, Thanks for your prompt response on this. The tpmC figures look very impressive, and tpmC is read intensive. I had already read note 236679.1 "Comparing Performance Between RAW IO vs OCFS vs EXT2/3" which I guess is the article to which you are referring; it made me suspect that the poor performance was due to the lack of an OS IO cache but I wasn't sure. The database is