similar to: Data corruption with samba 2.2.1a (resolved)

I've been using Samba 2.0.7-4 (Redhat RPM) successfully on a Linux machine to share files with a few Win2K clients. Just recently I compiled and installed Samba 2.2.1a. It seemed to work fine for a while, but occasionally one of the Windows machines would save a corrupted file to the server... This mainly happened with a Windows 3D rendering program I use, which periodically saves 1MB image

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92959 Bug ID: 92959 Summary: [NV1F celcius GeForce4 MX] Rendering artifacts, screen corruption, system reset. Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 (IA32) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90145 Bug ID: 90145 Summary: [NV94] Corruption on very long (vertical) pages in Firefox Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49142 Bug #: 49142 Summary: [NV4A] OpengGL content corruption when width >= 2048 Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Daniel J Blueman <daniel at quora.org> wrote: > On 9 February 2014 02:57, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Daniel J Blueman <daniel at quora.org> wrote: >>> Interestingly, there was graphical failure booting 3.6.11, even >>> nvidia-current fails to initialise, but these

On 9 February 2014 02:57, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Daniel J Blueman <daniel at quora.org> wrote: >> Interestingly, there was graphical failure booting 3.6.11, even >> nvidia-current fails to initialise, but these two issues could be due >> to running the Xorg stack in Ubuntu 14.04 pre-release. Using >>

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:21:35PM +0200, A L wrote: > On 2020-04-27 18:45, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:27:17AM +0200, A L via samba wrote: > > > On 2020-04-26 19:46, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:51:42AM +0200, A L via samba wrote: > > > > > * Connected from a Windows 10 computer

Just to clarify as i'm planning to put gluster in production (after fixing some issue, but for this I need community help): corruption happens only in this cases: - volume with shard enabled AND - rebalance operation In any other cases, corruption should not happen (or at least is not known to happen) So, what If I have to replace a failed brick/disks ? Will this trigger a rebalance and

The patch titled Subject: ocfs2: fix data corruption after failed write has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is ocfs2-fix-data-corruption-after-failed-write.patch This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/ocfs2-fix-data-corruption-after-failed-write.patch This patch will later

This code in vhost_scsi_make_tpg() is confusing because we limit "tpgt" to UINT_MAX but the data type of "tpg->tport_tpgt" and that is a u16. I looked at the context and it turns out that in vhost_scsi_set_endpoint(), "tpg->tport_tpgt" is used as an offset into the vs_tpg[] array which has VHOST_SCSI_MAX_TARGET (256) elements so anything higher than 255 then it

This code in vhost_scsi_make_tpg() is confusing because we limit "tpgt" to UINT_MAX but the data type of "tpg->tport_tpgt" and that is a u16. I looked at the context and it turns out that in vhost_scsi_set_endpoint(), "tpg->tport_tpgt" is used as an offset into the vs_tpg[] array which has VHOST_SCSI_MAX_TARGET (256) elements so anything higher than 255 then it

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:27:17AM +0200, A L via samba wrote: > > On 2020-04-26 19:46, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:51:42AM +0200, A L via samba wrote: > > > * Connected from a Windows 10 computer over 1G ethernet. * Copy data > > > using Windows Explorer and FastCopy(1) from the Samba share to a > > > local disk. * Verify

> corruption happens only in this cases: > > - volume with shard enabled > AND > - rebalance operation > I believe so > So, what If I have to replace a failed brick/disks ? Will this trigger > a rebalance and then corruption? > > rebalance, is only needed when you have to expend a volume, ie by > adding more bricks ? That's correct, replacing a brick

Anybody know if the fix for the incorrect kernel behaviour that leads to data corruption will be available for RHEL4/5 kernels?

We used rsync 2.6.3 on a couple of Solaris 8 machines to update an Oracle database from one machine to another. Here is the procedure I used: The source database was up and running so this operation was similar to doing a hot backup. I queried the source database for a list of tablespace names, and for each tablespace, I queried the list of datafiles. I put the tablespace in hot backup mode,

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76605 Priority: medium Bug ID: 76605 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Screen corruption and crashes in bastion on NVS-140M (G86) Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: matthias at blankertz.org

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled ocfs2: fix data corruption after failed write to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: ocfs2-fix-data-corruption-after-failed-write.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory. If

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled ocfs2: fix data corruption after failed write to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: ocfs2-fix-data-corruption-after-failed-write.patch and it can be found in the queue-5.4 subdirectory. If

https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/release-notes/3.12.6/ The major issue in 3.12.6 is not present in 3.12.7. Bugzilla ID listed in link. On May 29, 2018 8:50:56 PM EDT, Dan Lavu <dan at redhat.com> wrote: >What shard corruption bug? bugzilla url? I'm running into some odd >behavior >in my lab with shards and RHEV/KVM data, trying to figure out if it's >related. >

Hi! Today I encountered data corruption on two zfs pools due to a RAM failure in my OI box running on a dell T710. My rpool now looks like this (after reboot): pool: rpool state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption. Applications may be affected. action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the entire