similar to: Salvage or undelete files of damaged ext2/ext3 file systems

Having just spent a day trying to recover a deleted ext3 file for a friend, I'm wondering about this way of maintining undelete information in ext3, like is done for ext2: The last step in the deletion process would be to put back the (previously zeroed) block pointers. Since it gets logged to the journal, I _think_ that this should be safe. The worst that would happen is that, if the plug

Hi Folks, Thanks to several people's suggestions and clarifications, I think I have implemented a function which computes the conditional mean and covariance matrix of a subset of the dimensions of an MV-normal variable, given the values on the other dimensions (these conditioning value can be presented as a matrix, to deal with several cases at once). The code is below, for anyone who would

I often get the message: EXT2-fs warning (device hda6): ext2_fill_super: mounting ext3 filesystem as ext2 I have googled for a reason and a way to solve this - but not found something I could use. Maybe somebody here konws what to do? best regards keld

Dear R'sians, Would really appreciate if you could suggest a more efficient way to order the columns of a dataset. The column names of the dataset contain indices separated by a period. Following are examples of my code and the dataset. oC <- function(tg=x2) { lth <- length(grep("T",names(tg))) thix <-

What would it look like without this extension? If we modeled it as if all the register values were already on the stack (an extension of the current way where the singular value is modeled as being already on the stack, if I understand it correctly?)? If it's decided that the best approach is to introduce something like DW_OP_LLVM_register - might be worth migrating to that first (basically

Greetings, The following question has come up in an off-list discussion. Is it possible to construct a regular expression 'rex' out of two given regular expressions 'rex1' and 'rex2', such that a character string X matches 'rex' if and only if X matches 'rex1' AND X does not match 'rex2'? The desired end result can be achieved by logically combining

Hello, We have run and stopped by chance command "fsck -y" on one of our raid disks (with ext3 file system). After that we have found that SOME files disappeared (they are not seen in the directories where they have been before). The data are extremely important and contain a lot of programs, scripts for some data analysis and very hard to recover by hands. I have run ''fsck

Hi I have a problem with lm and predict I have us [1] 2789.53 3128.43 3255.03 3536.68 3933.18 4220.25 4462.83 4739.48 [9] 5103.75 5484.35 5803.08 5995.93 6337.75 6657.40 7072.23 7397.65 [17] 7816.83 8304.33 8746.98 9268.43 9816.98 10127.95 10469.60 10960.75 [25] 11685.93 12433.93 13194.70 13843.83 us.p [1] 227.62 229.92 232.13 234.25 236.31 238.42 240.59 242.75 244.97

Currently, the debug intrinsic functions each have 3 arguments: an SSA value representing either the address or Value of a local variable, a DILocalVariable, and a complex expression. If the SSA value is an Instruction, and that Instruction is at some point deleted, we attempt to salvage the SSA value by recreating the instruction within the complex expression. If the instruction cannot be

Hi I have written a small introduction to newbies in Danish on ssh and friends. Now some people are questioning my advice and I think they have a point. I am advocating people to use DSA-keys and a config file with this: Protocol 2 ForwardAgent yes ForwardX11 yes Compression yes CompressionLevel 9 and running ssh-agent and ssh-add, and then loggin in without giving keys. One

Hey all.. I had a bad IDE controller that hosed my EXT3 filesystems. A resulting fsck damaged pat of the filesystem and the root inode is gone (on my main drive AND the backup drive). I immediately DD'd the main drive over to an identical drive that I have been working on. But every time.. a fsck destroys all the data (moves everything to lost+found) and nothing that I've found

I have a damaged Ext3 filesystem which fsck has not been able to recover. If I try to mount it, I get a message like this in dmesg: EXT3-fs error (device sda1): ext3_free_blocks_sb: bit already cleared for block 2370866 If I try fsck on it, I get a series of messages like this: Inode bitmap for group 0 is not in group. (block 0) Relocate<y>? Up to group 95. Some say

>As the person who has advocated for DW_OP_LLVM_arg(N) before, my main motivation was to resolve the ambiguity of constant DIExpressions: As a worst-case example: > >dbg.value(%undef, !DILocalVariable(x), DIExpression(DW_OP_constu, 42)) > >Is this undefined, or constant 42? > >But if we make dbg.value fully variadic with all parameters pushed to the stack ahead of time, we can

Somehow my workstations lost their connection to the domain recently. I can rejoin them, but when I leave the domain and rejoin the previous user profiles are lost. Well, the data is still on the system, but all pre-rejoin domain profiles are listed as "account unknown" in the profile manager. I know I can probably use the Files and Settings Transfer Wizard on the XP machines as long

Greetings, I have "inherited" a cDNA macroarray dataset that is structured as follows. Three different stressors were tested. For each stressor, there are two treatments (control and stressed). For each treatment, two biological replicates exist, and these are paired (i.e., there is a stressed array for colony A and a control array from this same colony). For one of these samples,

For years, I could install, and sometimes run, legacy private map software under Wine. But in order to connect it with my GPSs, I had to keep a separate hard drive with XP, and do that there. Then came a brief time when I could also actually make my Garmin GPSs talk with the software under Wine. I transferred all my data to it, and gleefully wiped XP off my machine. Then the connecting

While rototilling packet.c, I did some looking at cipher_encrypt in cipher.c. It ends up that for SSH_CIPHER_NONE in cipher_encrypt, it uses memcpy. However, it also appears that dest and src can be equal in cipher_encrypt. On most sane libc implementations, memcpy == memmove. However, ANSI C makes no such guarantee, and some implementations out there are bound to try to optimize memcpy

Hi! I had problem yesterday with e2fsck. It reported a bad superblock. I then tried to use one of the other superblocks. To no avail. Then later I remembered that I had switched the fs type to xfs. Maybe e2fsck could recognize other common fs types, and report this instead? best regards keld

Hi I would like to sum a number of time series, some of them having NA's Standard action is here that if I sum a value with a NA, then the result is NA. I would like it to just keep the value. I then try to: a = NA; if (a == NA) { a = 0} just to try it out, but it says Error in if (a == NA) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed What is wrong, and can I do it smarter? I looked at

> That makes sense, and I think for "direct" values in your definition it is true that all direct values are r-values. > Why do we need DW_OP_LLVM_direct when we already have DW_OP_LLVM_stack_value? Can you give an example of something that is definitely not a stack value, but direct? The difference in definition is the intention: DW_OP_LLVM_direct means "we'd like this