Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "Why does file's inode change?"
2006 Jun 20
1
viewing ext3 journal
Hi!
Is there a way to view ext3 filesystem's maintained journal (in a
human-readable-format)?
I ask, because i have had a server crash before and now i'm wondering
if i might take a look at last things that my server did straight
before crash. I guess clarifying log insertions might be lost before
buffers were flushed to disk.
Thx.
2008 Jun 17
4
maximum MDT inode count
For future filesystem compatibility, we are wondering if there are any
Lustre MDT filesystems in existence that have 2B or more total inodes?
This is fairly unlikely, because it would require an MDT filesystem
that is > 8TB in size (which isn''t even supported yet) and/or has been
formatted with specific options to increase the total number of inodes.
This can be checked with
2008 Jun 17
4
maximum MDT inode count
For future filesystem compatibility, we are wondering if there are any
Lustre MDT filesystems in existence that have 2B or more total inodes?
This is fairly unlikely, because it would require an MDT filesystem
that is > 8TB in size (which isn''t even supported yet) and/or has been
formatted with specific options to increase the total number of inodes.
This can be checked with
2005 Jun 14
1
bad inode number followed by ext3_abort and remount readonly
I have seen this happen a number of times:
Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sda5): ext3_get_inode_block: bad inode number: 9
Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 kernel: Aborting journal on device sda5.
Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sda5): ext3_get_inode_block: bad inode number: 9
Jun 13 13:58:16 n202 last message repeated 6 times
Jun 13 13:58:18 n202 kernel: ext3_abort
2001 Mar 22
1
get root inode failed
Erm, sheez having alot of problems :(
I have just been reading all the archives on the mailing list for the past few hours and
decided to try make the journal with:
tune2fs -j -J10 /dev/hdc1
[root@tkw /]# tune2fs -j -J10 /dev/hdc1
tune2fs 1.20-WIP, 17-Jan-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
Creating journal inode: done
[root@tkw /]# cat /etc/fstab
/dev/hdc1 /usr/local ext3
2004 Dec 09
1
resize2fs on LVM on MD raid on Fedora Core 3 - inode table conflicts in fsck
Hi.
I'm attempting to setup a box here to be a file-server for all my data.
I'm attempting to resize an ext3 partition to demonstrate this
capability to myself before fully committing to this system as the
primary data storage. I'm having some problems resizing an ext3
filesystem after I've resized the underlying logical volume. Following
the ext3 resize, fsck spits out lots
2003 Mar 20
2
[Patch] ext3_journal_stop inode access
Hi Andrew,
The patch below addresses the problem we were talking about earlier
where ext3_writepage ends up accessing the inode after the page lock has
been dropped (and hence at a point where it is possible for the inode to
have been reclaimed.) Tested minimally (it builds and boots.)
It makes ext3_journal_stop take an sb, not an inode, as its final
parameter. It also sets
2008 Jan 28
1
Questions on MDT inode size
Hi,
The documentation warns about using smaller inodes than 512 bytes on the
MDT. If I plan to use a stripecount of one (I have many small files), is
it possible to use an inode size of 256 bytes and still use in-inode EAs
for metadata ?
Thanks
/Jakob
2001 Dec 19
3
ext3 inode error 28
hello:
I have been reviewin my message slog and have found the following
message:
Dec 19 06:27:28 server02 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,7)) in
ext3_new_inode: error 28
What is error 28 and should I be worried about it?
Ray Turcotte
2003 Dec 04
4
ext3_get_inode_loc: bad inode number:
I've got an approximately 100GB ext3 FS which we recently sized down
from 300GB using e2fsadm (with the disc offline obviously). I noticed the
following in dmesg the other day:
EXT3-fs error (device lvm(58,8)): ext3_get_inode_loc: bad inode number:
14827639
EXT3-fs error (device lvm(58,8)): ext3_get_inode_loc: bad inode number:
14041793
EXT3-fs error (device lvm(58,8)): ext3_get_inode_loc:
2006 Oct 13
1
e2defrag - Unable to allocate buffer for inode priorities
Hi, first of all, apologies if this isn't the right mailing list but it was the best I could find. If you know a better mailing list, please tell me.
Today I tried to defrag one of my filesystems. It's a 3.5T large filesystem that has 6 software-raids in the bottom and then merged together using lvm. I was running ext3 but removed the journal flag with
thor:~# tune2fs -O ^has_journal
2011 Aug 17
2
no dentry for non-root inode
hi!
One of our user removed a directory through samba and right after that
recreated it.
It looks like this now:
?????????? ? ? ? ? ? 20110817
Gluster version is 3.2.2-1ubuntu~ppa1~lucid1 on client (samba server)
and the same but Natty on the nodes. It was upgraded from 3.2.1.
What is this? If a client try to access it, it freezes up.
This is in log:
[2011-08-17
2005 Jul 25
2
[Fwd: e2fsck Segmentation Fault]
Hi,
Somehow I've managed to get e2fsck to seg fault.. The filesystem in
question started acting very strangely (e.g. filenames changing from
music to MuSiC etc) so I rebooted, and since when fsck has crashed every
time it has been run.
I'm not really sure what any of this means, so I didn't know what
debugging output to include, but below is the output of e2fsck.
(I would have
2006 Sep 26
3
EXT3-fs: invalid journal inode.
Hi Everyone,
I have a server which has a raid array on /dev/sdb. After a crash I
tried to mount the array and it failed with:
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb,
missing codepage or other error
dmesg reports:
EXT3-fs: invalid journal inode.
I tried to run e2fsck and it failed (The output can be seen below).
If anyone has any suggestions on how I can restore
2001 Nov 23
3
core dumped messages from tune2fs
I decided to start using ext3. My kernel 2.4.15p9.
I downloaded and build util-linux-2.11m
and e2fsprogs 1.25.
I compiled ext3 in the kernel.
I started converting my filesystems and thing went ok for the first few.
I then started getting the following on each additional filesystem.
[root@joker /root]# tune2fs -j /dev/hdc4
tune2fs 1.25 (20-Sep-2001)
Creating journal inode: done
This filesystem
2006 Oct 13
1
FW: e2defrag - Unable to allocate buffer for inode priorities
I have made some more research and found out the following ..
thor:~# df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
-[cut]-
/dev/mapper/vgraid-data
475987968 227652 475760316 1% /data
thor:~# strace e2defrag -r /dev/vgraid/data
-[cut]-
mmap2(NULL, 1903955968, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0)
= 0x46512000
(delay 15 seconds
2010 Apr 21
2
[PATCH] ocfs2: Update VFS inode's id info after reflink.
In reflink we update the id info in the disk but forget to update
the corresponding information in the VFS inode. So update them
accordingly in case we want to preserve the attributes.
Reported-by: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu at oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma at oracle.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
2007 Jun 05
1
Help on ext3 file system corruption issue
Hi All,
I m a novice developer of Linux applications. Recently I faced a file
system corruption. (I guess)
I have a Kernel 2.4.7-10 with ext3 file system in compact flash. The
system was up for 3 months and was running with average load conditions.
One fine day, it just started sending kernel messages on the serial
console. The message was like this.
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)):
2002 Jul 24
2
ext3 orphaned inode list
Hello,
last fsck says my /tmp and my /home files system has errors, here is the
log from fsck using the read-only option:
How to recover from this savely?
How to avoid this in future?
i am using kernel 2.4.18 with the acl-patches from acl.bestbits.at and the
patches for the fileutils and e2fsprogs.
If you need more informations please mail.
2006 Jan 30
1
df reports false size
On a customer's machine running SuSE 9.2, the size of the occupied space on
the harddisk is reported incorrectly by "df -h". After we noticed the
problem, I rebooted the machine and had it checked by "e2fsck" (check forced
with "tune2fs -C 40", we are not on location). Right after the reboot I
proceeded as follows, but I could not find any information about