similar to: Samba and file locking

Hi there, Being a strong believer in "There is no such thing as a stupid question", here comes nothing... At the moment I am working my way through the "HTB Linux queuing discipline manual - user guide" and I have a question... I implement the tc commands using a simple bash script. But I have yet to find a way to adjust the settings. Whenever I do "tc filter del dev

Hi list, Up front: A bit sorry this post turned out a wee bit long I work as a system administrator for the Atlas College in the Netherlands. We are what is called a merger school consisting of 5 separate (more or less) locations and one central administration. The network is a class A network (10.0.0.0/8) in which all locations have there own subnet (i.e. 10.9.0.0/16 for the central

Hi, I am trying to convert the following NLMIXED code to NLME, but am running into problems concerning 'Singularity in backsolve'. As I am new to R/S-Plus, I thought I may be missing something in the NLME code. NLMIXED *********** proc nlmixed data=kidney.kidney; parms delta=0.03 gamma=1.1 b1=-0.003 b2=-1.2 b3=0.09 b4=0.35 b5=-1.43 varu=0.5; eta=b1*age+b2*sex+b3*gn+b4*an+b5*pkn+u;

Hi list... I work for a school in the netherlands with a 2mbit Internet uplink and about 3800 eager student who want to play games on the Internet using one of our 800 workstations. Problem was that those game playing students are concentrated in 2 of our 6 physical locations... and they consumed the bandwidth which the other location would like to use for educational purposes. The thing we did

Hi Guus, The first example was a manual connect, the second example was debug regards Robert >>> "Robert Horgan" <robert at nsasia.co.th> 13-Jun-18 10:21 AM >>> Hi, Are you sure? What happens if you manually telnet/socket 10.130.39.180 nsasia at web3:~$ telnet 10.130.39.180 655 Trying 10.130.39.180... Connected to 10.130.39.180. Escape

You know I think I've seen this once before. Got ID from db1 (10.130.39.180 port 655): 0 db1 17 Sending METAKEY to db1 It looks like it's communicating properly but there is a problem with your keys. Can you rename and regenerate your keys? On a project I'm working on when we transferred our keys to another client it put Carriage returns so there was a key mismatch. Try that and

Hi, Are you sure? What happens if you manually telnet/socket 10.130.39.180 nsasia at web3:~$ telnet 10.130.39.180 655 Trying 10.130.39.180... Connected to 10.130.39.180. Escape character is '^]'. 0 db1 17 Connection closed by foreign host. Stopping the service and running debug I get: nsasia at web3:~$ sudo tincd -n gainplus -d5 -D tincd 1.0.33 starting, debug level 5

Yes, I am sure but added another broader rule: nsasia at db1:~$ sudo ufw allow from any port 655 proto udp same result for debug example. regards Robert >>> Rafael Wolf <rfwolf at gmail.com> 13-Jun-18 5:32 PM >>> Telnet will only do tcp not udp which tinc works on. Are you sure udp 655 is open? On Wed, Jun 13, 2018, 3:51 AM Robert Horgan <robert

On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 17:13:02 +0200 Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:59:56 +0100 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:55:24 +0200 > > Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 12:51:33 +0100 > >

On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 16:26:36 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 17:13:02 +0200 > Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:59:56 +0100 > > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:55:24 +0200 >

Hi All, >>>>> Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel >>>>> parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning? >>>>> >>>>> I have currently set it by running 'ulimit -s 10240' but this does not >>>>> survive a reboot. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>

On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:55:24 +0200 Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 12:51:33 +0100 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > Failed to modify SPNs on CN=db1,CN=Computers,DC=mydom,DC=lan: > > > > > acl: spn validation failed for spn[TERMSRV/DB1.MYDOM] > > > >

On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:59:56 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:55:24 +0200 > Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 12:51:33 +0100 > > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Failed to modify SPNs on

Hi Rowland, On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:46:24 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Failed to modify SPNs on CN=db1,CN=Computers,DC=mydom,DC=lan: acl: > > spn validation failed for spn[TERMSRV/DB1.MYDOM] uac[0x1000] > > account[db1$] hostname[(null)] nbname[mydom] ntds[(null)] > > forest[mydom.lan] domain[mydom.lan] > > > > At

On 17/02/16 14:44, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/17/2016 08:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 02/17/2016 08:10 AM, Michael H wrote: >>>> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted, >>>> that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest. >>>> >>>> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as

On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 13:00:57 +0200 Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:46:24 +0100 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Failed to modify SPNs on CN=db1,CN=Computers,DC=mydom,DC=lan: acl: > > > spn validation failed for spn[TERMSRV/DB1.MYDOM] uac[0x1000]

On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 12:51:33 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Failed to modify SPNs on CN=db1,CN=Computers,DC=mydom,DC=lan: acl: > > > > spn validation failed for spn[TERMSRV/DB1.MYDOM] uac[0x1000] > > > > account[db1$] hostname[(null)] nbname[mydom] ntds[(null)] > > > > forest[mydom.lan] domain[mydom.lan]

# Just when I thought I had the basic stuff mastered.... # This has been quite perplexing, thanks for any help ## Here's the example: db1=data.frame( olditems=c('soup','','','','nuts'), prices=c(4.45, 3.25, 4.42, 2.25, 3.98)) db2=data.frame( newitems=c('stew','crackers','tofu','goatsmilk','peanuts'))

Hello, I've got some log entries like these on our DCs: Failed to modify SPNs on CN=db1,CN=Computers,DC=mydom,DC=lan: acl: spn validation failed for spn[TERMSRV/DB1.MYDOM] uac[0x1000] account[db1$] hostname[(null)] nbname[mydom] ntds[(null)] forest[mydom.lan] domain[mydom.lan] At first I thought it was about missing SPN entries, but adding these did not resolve the problem: # samba-tool

Hi, re-posting this with a more appropriate subject for my reply; > The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted, > that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest. > > Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as > Important .. so you should boot to that anyway: >