similar to: kbs-CentOS-testing rsyslog unsigned, yum won't update it on 5.1

Well, there's so few going right now that I'm showing 38 days to get the DVD. My normal dnld from a mirror travels appx. 600Mb/sec. I'll wait until most of the U.S. goes home before I give up and use the normal download though. Here's hoping... -- Bill

Ran yum update this A.M. Got this. Is it a problem for rpmforge, CentOS or just me? Maybe not a problem at all? /etc/ld.so.conf.d files are "box stock", so there were no clues there. TIA for any insight. =================================================== Running Transaction Updating : cups-libs [ 1/10] /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/liblzo.so.1 is

Recently (and for ages, I'm sure) folks have suffered partition destruction and had to try and recover. In the recent thread, the victim eventually had to resort to Google and fond some package that I can not remember now. Well, I was perusing my YumInfo.lst.05, for general info, and I discovered this (potential) little gem. Thought I would pass it on and make it "more googleable"

On 12 March 2008, "William L. Maltby" <CentOS4Bill at triad.rr.com> wrote: > Message: 95 > Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:56:42 -0400 > From: "William L. Maltby" <CentOS4Bill at triad.rr.com> > Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 5 Evolution Update errors. > To: CentOS General List <centos at centos.org> > Message-ID: <1205323003.5338.6.camel at

Folks, Evo update on my 4.x worked just fine. 5.0 generated a bunch of parsing errors preceded and followed by a couple of I/O errors that appear related to an unavailable URL. I first figured corruption on my node, so I yum erased evo, its - connector and -webcal units. The data-server removal looked as if it might remove half my Gnome desktop, so I left it in place. Then I did a selective

Anybody have tricks to write the i386 ISO image to DVD? I've tried DVD+-RW, DVD+R, DVD-RW, DVD-R in both Windows 7 (two different writers) and rebooted into CentOS 6 (x86_64) and tried cdrecord (now called wodim). On wodim I've tried overburn, reducing speeds, etc. All give the same results: the same number of bytes are written - indicating the disc is full (according to my calculations)

Alle, Has anyone gotten Zimbra to work on an installation of CentOS4.3, x86_64 architecture? I have tried to install the RHEL4 3.1.4 32-bit version with the following error: Found zimbra-core Error: attempting to install i386 packages on a x86_64 OS. Exiting... Shouldn't this work with 32-bit compat? I've also tried to install RHEL4_64 4.0.0.RC1 but post installation fails when

Johnny, Thought I'd try these out for you. Looks like a prerequisite is missing? yum --enablerepo=c5-testing install java-1.6.0-openjdk\* <snip the usual gobbledygook> 330 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package

I need to start running a dual head on one of my machines. Eventual target is CentOS 5.x. Decided to test first on my 4.6 setup (eventually it will achieve 5.x). Both machines are fully up to date. The test machine is 4.6, 2 radeon video cards. Searched the web, CentOS site, even bugzilla. This bugzilla entry from a 4.2 system), http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1875 had only a WFM response.

I sometimes receive e-mails I post to this list, like I did the bug I reported about X problems, but other times not, like my first post about that before I reported the bug. That one appeared in gmane, but Evolution never picked it up. And today I've not seen either of my posts but I know it got there because I did see a reply to my post about the flash plugin and it had a snippet of my post

Hello: The box is dual boot (Win XP & CentOS 5). A Dell Dimension 4300 Celeron. There was an intermittent problem with this last year and last Thanksgiving, I wiped the HD and installed Win XP and CentOS 5 clean. My daughter asked me to install KStars which is in the kdeedu RPM on the Fedora Core 6 Install DVD. I did that, without any problems, on my box and on my wife's box. On the

Looks like Firefox may be getting another update soon, if my problem is not atypical. Prior to the latest, had NP for *months*. Anyone else seeing any problems? BTW, running the recent Java console from sun that was detailed in another thread a week or two back with Firefox. Had NP prior to the latest update, if that offers any useful info. Would like to test the openjdk for us if it's

On 2015-04-04, Bill Maltby (C4B) <centos4bill at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 11:12 +0100, Nux! wrote: >> 100% with Digimer here. <snip> > >> All this energy should be put into contributing towards to the >> project, testing, helping out community. > > Well, I used to agree. But when a bug report filed in December goes > untouched entering

I decided I would like to try GnuCash on my 5.x desktop system. I did an available list and got this gnucash.i386 2.2.4-1.el5.kb kbs-CentOS-Testi gnucash-docs.noarch 2.2.0-2.el5.kb kbs-CentOS-Testi Did a yum --enablerepo=kbs-CentOS-Testing install gnucash\* That produced Package gnucash-docs-2.2.0-2.el5.kb.noarch.rpm is not signed I figured I had forgot to

>Message: 23 >Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:11:59 -0400 >From: Dan Halbert <halbert at everyzing.com> >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Newbie ADSL configuration, ppp0 can't activate & > config not found >To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> >Message-ID: <469830EF.3080601 at everyzing.com> mailing-lists at computer2.com wrote: <snip>

I had the electricity go out the other day. When my Centos 4.3 workstation came up, I said yes when it got to the prompt "Unclean shutdown, force filesystem check?" prompt. It ground away for awhile and then said something about a bad superblock. Yikes! I thought, that's a bad sign. After a reboot, I got nothing but a grub> prompt. I tried booting into rescue mode using the

On Aug 16, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) <centos4bill at gmail.com> wrote: > My preliminary conclusion is there's something in java and/or > libreoffice that begins causing load on the X server once activity > begins. The full effects of the java applet in FF could not be > determined during the attempt to duplicate due to the lack of a data > feed Saturday and

On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 17:00 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) > <centos4bill at gmail.com> wrote: > > I sometimes receive e-mails I post to this list, like I did the bug I > > reported about X problems, but other times not, like my first post about > > that before I reported the bug. That one appeared in gmane, but >

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) <centos4bill at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Or, just make the question interesting enough that someone will reply to it.... >> > > Does a crash report and bug filing qualify? The silence on that one has > deafened me! :-)) > Only if someone else has seen the same symptoms. I've got one box that hangs every

On 2015-01-23, Bill Maltby (C4B) <centos4bill at gmail.com> wrote: > > Actually, my rant was much more about it interrupting me, without being > asked, to do some updates that I didn't yet request *and* being > persistent about it over time in *my* (not Freedesktop.org's) work > space. Perhaps if you'd specified that in your original post there would have been a