similar to: Segmentation fault in nmbd when working with Dave 2.5.2

> There is nothing stopping you connecting directly to your shares, or using a domain member as a fileserver I agree, but for most of users T talked with, via friendly name (NetBios) but not quite long (DNS) is more comfortable. > In my personal opinion, you are risking trouble by still using XP, yes I know that sometimes you have to, but I would suggest that you start > making plans to

As I know runnig of Nmbd at Acitve Directory mode is quite unofficial now (but possible) . I will not ask why it is not reccomded to run Nmbd within Samba4 started at AD mode. But if somebody can tell, you are wellcome. But when nmb code implementation is planned to AD part ? That is when nmb functionnality adding to Samba4 acting as AD is planned ? To bring possibiity to use full-forced

On 05/12/15 11:45, CpServiceSPb . wrote: >> There is nothing stopping you connecting directly to your shares, or using a domain member as a fileserver > I agree, but for most of users T talked with, via friendly name > (NetBios) but not quite long (DNS) is more comfortable. > >> In my personal opinion, you are risking trouble by still using XP, yes I know that sometimes you

Note: LMB = Local Master Browser DMB = Domain Master Browser Have Samba 2.2.7A running embedded in a variant of ucLinux. My interest was only to use Samba as a WINS server. I've set up the SMB.CONF with this config. for one test: wins support = yes local master = no domain master = yes preferred master = no os level = 0 I've set up the SMB.CONF with this config. for the other

If I have a client that wants to enumerate and access shares on a subnet, and that client knows the IP of the WINS server, is there any need for the client to use the "browsing" services of a DMB or LMB? What is the order of operations of the client? Here is what I imagine to be the case: 1. client asks LMB for a list of all available shares 2. LMB sends client the list of all known

R Experts, I would like to create a series of variables without having to assign a separate line of code for each new variable. My abbreviated dataframe (DF) contains two groups of linked variables (SP1:SP3) and (CAU1:CAU3). Within SP1:SP3 are character codes (full dataframe contains 26 unique codes and SP1:SP9, CAU1:CAU9). CAU1 represents the quantitative measurement of code x in variable

Hi, i'm reading: samba-3.0.20a/docs/htmldocs/Samba3-HOWTO/NetworkBrowsing.html#id2564441 ... The election process is /fought out, so to speak/ over every NetBIOS network interface. In the case of a Windows 9x/Me machine that has both TCP/IP and IPX installed and has NetBIOS enabled over both protocols, the election will be decided over both protocols. As often happens, if the Windows 9x/Me

Hello ! I have a problem of syncing browse lists between DMB and LMB. The topology of ours network is as follows: Linux Network comma(Linux, DMB, WINS) vol(Linux) door(Linux, LMB) | | | | | | | | | --------------(195.226.226.16/28)------ | | | | | | | --(local net

Dear All, Sorry if this is the wrong place for this question, or if I'm just being daft, but I can't get warnquota to send emails to the right address. When I put a test user (gollum) over quota, and run warnquota on a server (nfs2.lmb.internal), the email generated by warnquota appears in the maillog as "to=<gollum at nfs2.lmb.internal>," What I need is the email to

I am still trying to make samba work over a WAN with multiple workgroups although I am just about to throw in the towel. I had hoped to find a solution that would permit a Windows PC to browse a (MS) workgroup (ie retrieve the browse list from the workgroup master browser for a remote (MS) workgroup when that MB is NOT a samba server). Since WINS only provides the broadcast address of the remote

Been experimenting with Samba as a WINS server. Need a WINS server as I am using VPN tunneling. My goal was to set up a central WINS server and have all the computers talk to it for NetBIOS name resolution. In the end I was hoping to have only one Samba server. I have currently worked with: Samba 2.2.7B on a uclinux. Samba 3.0.10 on RedHat. Samba 3.0.10 on Slackware. Samba 3.0.10 on FreeBSD.

Specifying Browser Computers When you start a computer running Windows 2000, the browser service looks in the registry for the entry MaintainServerList to determine whether a computer will become a browser. MaintainServerList is found in the following registry subkey: \HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Browser\Parameters Table I.1 shows the values to which MaintainServerList

Can someone clarify this for me? The docs are not clear. It seems that an election is held when: * There is no LMB or the current LMB shuts down. * A machine joins the network with "preferred master = yes" and forces an election. Any other times when an election is held? What's also not clear is how OFTEN the election is held. The how-to makes a passing reference that "two

hello, i have problem with Local Master Browser (LMB) election on our network and i'd like to ask you for help. we have setup local network for wireless internet connection sharing. it uses 10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 range and computers use common workgroup (named Riadok). there is about 20 computers and 1 server (10.0.0.1) running samba. it works also like primary DNS server, proxy and

List, I'm trying to figure out how to get access to remote shares.... I have two RH 5.2 boxes running 2.04b separated by routers (pecan the VIRCIO lmb and shipe the COMMUNITY lmb)... I turned on remote browse sync to get the browselist from COMMUNITY onto VIRCIO. The COMMUNITY domain shows up on VIRCIO, but it is empty... I don't know, but I think that this could be security

I am trying to compare Vbert growth curves from several years of fish data. I am following the code provided by: http://www.ncfaculty.net/dogle/fishR/gnrlex/VonBertalanffy/VonBertalanffy.pdf. Specifically the section on VBGM Comparisons between groups. ? This code is pretty cut and dry. I am able to run it perfectly with the "fake" data that is provided. But when I run it with my own

PROBLEM: Cross-subnet browsing is not working. Browse lists on all machines contain only the machines on the local subnet. SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS: The Local Master Browser (LMB) running Windows XP (ZAYIN) never contacts the Domain Master Browser (DMB) running Samba (BETH) to initiate a synchronization of browse lists.

I realize this is most likely the most killed topic anyone on the net. Most of the information i've found don't directly answer this question. I have a Samba server set up as the DMB and LMB via smb.conf. I have set up nmbd to do WINS. I setup all my XP box clients to use my Samba server. I ran Ethereal on the server and can see the Samba server wins election for DMA and LMB. I can

We soon want to pass flags, e.g., to mark added System RAM resources. mergeable. Prepare for that. This patch is based on a similar patch by Oscar Salvador: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190625075227.15193-3-osalvador at suse.de Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu at kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko at suse.com> Cc: Dan Williams

Hi, I'm using Samba 3.0.21c with PDC and severals BDC in different subnets. I'm triing to use Wins servers on all the BDC servers and on the PDC. The problems occurs in the network browsing. I'm able to see all computers with the PDC on the different subnets but I just can see local servers in the network neighborhood on BDC When starting BDC i've got the "unable to find