similar to: Problem with permisions (to ONE share with MANY folders within).

hi, i'm running smaba 3.0.4 with share level user and domain logon. as a first test i've created a direcotry using windows explorer. now i try to assing a group to this dir. when i click OK i get a messeage that tells me, that i'm not permited to do this. samba log shows: ==> log.smbd <== [2004/08/27 16:39:17, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(619) pc48006

ssh supports an override for StrictModes which allows a user to use group-writable .ssh directories. Is there an easy way to make openssh do this (I didn't see options in the source)? Or is this worth adding? Rafi

Good evening! I have installed samba 4.3.0pre1-GIT-6bbfb09 on centos 6.6 like active directory and domain controller. It turns out that, the past wednesday I lost  the administrative permissions of theadministrator and domain admins users. When I try to make a change at Remote Server Administration tool over one domain user says this: " the access rights are insufficient to carry out this

On 10/27/2020 1:08 PM, Dan Egli via samba wrote: > >> What version of Samba ? >> >> Please post your smb.conf >> >> Rowland >> >> > Sorry, Samba? version 4.11.2-13 is running on CentOS? 8.? My smb.conf is > shown below, sans comments: > > > [global] > > ??????? workgroup = EgliFamily > ??????? server string = Samba Server Version

On 10/28/2020 2:49 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 28/10/2020 08:00, Dan Egli via samba wrote: >> It's been over 24 hours and no one has even touched this. I could really >> use a bit of help. Yes, it works when I create the files/dirs in samba >> because of the masks I set, but that's just a kludge. It shouldn't >> matter that the GROUP permissions

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Dan > Egli via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 28 oktober 2020 9:01 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] odd issue with permisions > > On 10/27/2020 1:08 PM, Dan Egli via samba wrote: > > > >> What version of Samba ? > >> > >>

Mandi! Dan Egli via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I posted the getfacl output a minute or two ago. I've had missed that. > Next idea? :) No one. But plain 'POSIX' access (eg, ssh) works? Eg if you try to redo the operation that does not work with samba using plain ssh access (with the same user), they works? -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66

On 28/10/2020 10:24, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hm, samba 4.11.2-13 is running on CentOS? 8. > Im not really into CentOS/RH im more Debian/Ubuntu.. > > But I suggest you try this. > > Remove [homes] ( or keep it but add a new one. ) > > Setup > [users] > Path = /home > browseable = yes > read only = no > > Test again against that

On 10/28/2020 4:14 AM, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > >> Next idea? :) > No one. But plain 'POSIX' access (eg, ssh) works? Eg if you try to redo > the operation that does not work with samba using plain ssh access > (with the same user), they works? > Yes, ssh works just fine.? Here's an example of it: [dan at jupiter2 ~]$ mkdir test3 [dan at jupiter2 ~]$ cd

On 10/28/2020 3:31 AM, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Dan Egli via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > >> Why on earth would samba even CARE about group permissions when user >> permissions are perfectly fine? Help me fix this? > Consider that, if POSIX ACL are enabled on this FS, the group > permission are considered as a 'mask' for all ACL, with

We are using SAMBA 3.6.6 on Centos 5 with the acl_tdb VFS module. Our share is backed by storage on a SAN devices that does not support ACLs or extended attributes ... so we're trying the acl_tdb module as a mechanism to support Windows ACLs. We have verified that samba has ACL support enabled, and ACL support works find if we export the share from the local EXT4 filesystem. When trying to

On 28/10/2020 08:00, Dan Egli via samba wrote: > It's been over 24 hours and no one has even touched this. I could really > use a bit of help. Yes, it works when I create the files/dirs in samba > because of the masks I set, but that's just a kludge. It shouldn't > matter that the GROUP permissions are if the USER permissions allow > access and the file is owned by the

Hm, samba 4.11.2-13 is running on CentOS? 8. Im not really into CentOS/RH im more Debian/Ubuntu.. But I suggest you try this. Remove [homes] ( or keep it but add a new one. ) Setup [users] Path = /home browseable = yes read only = no Test again against that new share, but not with smbclient alone, setup a cifs mount and test and/or use a windows client pc. Preffered W10 or

I'm really confused about something. It seems like on my samba server the user AND GROUP permissions must match for me to access any files in my home directory. Here's an example of what I mean: ($ = at unix shell, > = in smbclient) $ mkdir ~dan/test1 $ chmod 700 ~dan/test1 $ smbclient -U dan //localhost/dan > cd test1 > put test1.txt (failure, NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) > quit

hi... i can setup dovecot lda in postfix with sieve in testing enviroment using dovecot 1.2.10 and dovecot-1.2-sieve-0.0.15 but now i want to setup them in producction so i reproduce the steps to do them but i receive the following errors: log dovecot-deliver-errors.log: Jul 29 11:48:26 deliver(xxxx at xxxx): Error: userdb lookup: connect(/var/spool/postfix/private/auth-master) failed:

On 10/27/2020 12:50 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 27/10/2020 18:35, Dan Egli via samba wrote: >> I'm really confused about something. It seems like on my samba server >> the user AND GROUP permissions must match for me to access any files in >> my home directory. Here's an example of what I mean: ($ = at unix shell, >>> = in smbclient) >> $

http://www.blorp.com/~peter/zips/in_vorbis.zip another bunch of bugfixes and some new features (see tag editor advanced mode) -Peter -- 26 maja - Dzien Matki. Wygraj kwiaty dla swojej Mamy! Do rozdania 75 bukietow z dostawa i zyczeniami. [ http://zakupy.onet.pl/prezenty.asp?k=7 ] --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To

Hello lartc! I have strange problem setting load balancing over 4 interfaces. Something won''t accept more than 3 interfaces, While setting: ip route add default scope global \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc0 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc1 weight 1 \ nexthop via 0.0.0.0 dev pvc2 weight 1 It''s ok: ip r l default nexthop dev pvc0

Witam Sieve implementation in dovecot 1.2 have hard-coded limit for max redirect: SIEVE_DEFAULT_MAX_REDIRECTS 4. I have to rise this to much higher value, e.g. 64. Is there possibility to do this another way than recompiling source? Maybe adding an option to dovecot.conf in plugin section will be a good idea. -- Pozdrowienia Maciej Polewczynski Registered Linux user #117725 OGICOM Sp.

I have a need to have users SSH into a server where they are limited to a chroot jail (sandbox). Once they are there, they need to be able to execute 'ssh' and 'scp' to other systems. I've no problem setting up the basic chroot jail and providing basic functionality (ls, cat, less, etc). The part that is stopping me is setting it up so that that user can then 'ssh'