similar to: extremely slow "ls" on a cleared fatty ext3 directory on FC4/5

Hi, all, I'm a newbie to ext3 file system, but what a pity if ext3 could not shrink after containing files and subdirectories get deleted. If the ext3 directory could not shrink, then another natural question is: can the deleted directory entries be overwritten by new files/subdirs? The following is an example to detail my question: Suppose a directory named myDir hold 3 files a, b, c.

I was just playing with git 1.5.3.8 and btrfs 0.11, and I noticed something odd. If I prepare a very simple repository: $ mkdir foo $ cd foo $ git init Initialized empty Git repository in .git/ $ echo hi > blort $ git add . $ git commit -m create Created initial commit 4ae9415: create 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 blort and then

Since the d_off in the first dirent for "." (that originates from the 4th argument "offset" of filldir() for the 2nd dirent for "..") is wrongly assigned in btrfs_real_readdir(), telldir returns same offset for different locations. | # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb1 | # mount /dev/sdb1 fs0 | # cd fs0 | # touch file0 file1 | # ../test | telldir: 0 | readdir: d_off = 2,

LOL. This is a horrible subject line.? I've been trying to resolve a DDOS issue, and ignoring a lot of email.? Here I had been thinking this was a sex-spam, and I just got around to wondering why the spam system isn't working quite right and they kept coming in.? :P Not sure if this was suggested, but use SSD's.? With a ton of mail combined with Maildir random reads/writes,

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:50:29 -0600 Rick Romero <rick at havokmon.com> wrote: > LOL. > > This is a horrible subject line.? I've been trying to resolve a DDOS > issue, and ignoring a lot of email.? > > Here I had been thinking this was a sex-spam, and I just got around to > wondering why the spam system isn't working quite right and they kept > coming in.? :P

Quoting mancyborg at gmail.com: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:50:29 -0600 > Rick Romero <rick at havokmon.com> wrote: > >> LOL. >> >> This is a horrible subject line.? I've been trying to resolve a DDOS >> issue, and ignoring a lot of email.? >> >> Here I had been thinking this was a sex-spam, and I just got around to >> wondering why the

Hi, On 2015-11-10 01:44, mancyborg at gmail.com wrote: > Hello dear list, > I've recently discovered 'doveadm stats' and I'm trying to use > "doveadm stats dump user" and "doveadm stats dump session" > to understand the pop/imap users that put more stress on the hard > disks. > > My problem is that some users refuse to delete their emails

On 2015-11-11 03:44, mancyborg at gmail.com wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:50:50 +0100 > Christian Kivalo <ml+dovecot at valo.at> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 2015-11-10 01:44, mancyborg at gmail.com wrote: >> > Hello dear list, >> > I've recently discovered 'doveadm stats' and I'm trying to use >> > "doveadm stats

I think it has a lot to do with telldir on an NFS share returning a cookie that is supposed to be unique rather than an actual offset. Problem is, that cookie is stored as a 31bit hash which can then end up as a negative signed offset in Samba which is not handled correctly. The cookies are not necessarily consecutive as you move through a directory. On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 19:00, Jeremy Allison

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 08:01:40PM +0100, Conor Armstrong wrote: > I think it has a lot to do with telldir on an NFS share returning a cookie > that is supposed to be unique rather than an actual offset. Problem is, > that cookie is stored as a 31bit hash which can then end up as a negative > signed offset in Samba which is not handled correctly. The cookies are not >

I'm trying to get to the bottom of where the normal directory functions differ in results for block storage compared to NFS. I created a short c script to look at the offsets generated for the directory when block storage backed in comparison to NFS backed. block storage backed are always positive: File: 5050, Offset: 9213006461214587617 File: 6567, Offset: 9218690536865144001 File: 4033,

Forgot to CC: the list. ----- Forwarded message from Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ----- Cc: jra at samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Missing Files/Missing Folders from an NFS Share On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 08:06:28PM +0100, Conor Armstrong wrote: > Rowland & Jeremy - thanks for this! > I built a copy of the latest version from github 4.19 and same issue > arises. ? >

Hello dear list, I've recently discovered 'doveadm stats' and I'm trying to use "doveadm stats dump user" and "doveadm stats dump session" to understand the pop/imap users that put more stress on the hard disks. My problem is that some users refuse to delete their emails from the server, so they keep 20GB of maildir files on the server, the webmail (roundcube)

On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:50:50 +0100 Christian Kivalo <ml+dovecot at valo.at> wrote: > Hi, > > On 2015-11-10 01:44, mancyborg at gmail.com wrote: > > Hello dear list, > > I've recently discovered 'doveadm stats' and I'm trying to use > > "doveadm stats dump user" and "doveadm stats dump session" > > to understand the

On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:40:25AM +0100, Conor Armstrong wrote: > Ok, starting to make sense now.? In order to fix it.... > I note that the lower level calls are wrapped in dir.c - eg > dptr_SeekDir(...) wraps SeekDir(...) > this might allow for some code to use array indexes instead of NFS cookies > as noted by Chris Chilvers here for the 3.10 kernel: >

Alternately, we could possibly modify the dptr_TellDir function to set a flag somewhere if it ever returns a negative offset. Then any calls to dptr_SeekDir checks if the flag is set and does a slower approach of a RewindDir and then multiple ReadDir & TellDir calls until we get the matching offset. If flag is not set then go with the normal SeekDir call??? On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 at 00:40,

Ok, starting to make sense now. In order to fix it.... I note that the lower level calls are wrapped in dir.c - eg dptr_SeekDir(...) wraps SeekDir(...) this might allow for some code to use array indexes instead of NFS cookies as noted by Chris Chilvers here for the 3.10 kernel: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAAmbk-e-YQAPo6QyNB0aJyc9qzUShmEC+x5eTR7wqp1ABWADsg at mail.gmail.com/T/ > On the

Hi all, Does anyone run Asterisk on FC4? with Digium's TDM40B cards. any success stories? my Intel 865 M'd+ Intel 3.0GHz freezee during installation (FC4). Please any comments? Kumara

Is anyone running FC4 SMP domU''s? I don''t recall if I tested this before and today I noticed that I can only bring up FC4 domU''s as UP even though vcpus = 2. xm list and /proc/cpuinfo are in agreement :-) Regards, Ted _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Can someone point me to a step-by-step on samba w/FC4? Honestly, I'm only trying a basic share, no rocket science. I've already a samba server on RH9 with the same clients and users trying to access a share on FC4. Logs and testparm returns everything fine. Had SELINUX on and off. Cannot browse even home directories. Thanks, exasperated