similar to: Thanks

Hello all. I'm having some trouble with a big RAID disk formatted with ext3 under RHEL3. The size of the partition is 1.5 Tb and the sector size is 32Mb. The partition was intended to store very large files (1 or 2 Gb each one) but the reality is that there are also a lot of TXT files (less than 1Kb). As every TXT is taking 32Mb and there are a lot I'm loosing around 300 Gb of space. I

Hola, new to the list and maybe having problems with english I ask for a friendly and a not too difficult answer. Using Windows 7 Pro, D-link DNS-323 NAS-Storage rSync: actual Version (just downloaded) Here is the stange behavier: I use rsync.exe -a -v --progress --delete --ignore-errors --force /cygdrive/N/ /cygdrive/ "//SPEICHER/Volume_1/Backup/10-er/D$/" So I want to backup the

Hello Martin, > how a number of samples with no defined size is translated into 8, 16, or 32 bit values in my buffer Although I do not know in detail about the actual implementation of libvorbis, most of the decoders should internally produce single-precision (32bit) floating point values, or 32bit integers as the result of PCM decoding. They are downcast to PCM samples with 8bit, 16bit, or

I can't seem to get rsync to restart where it left off when I am syncing a large file (> 5GB). Below is some info on what I have been doing. If someone has the energy to barrel through my comments that would be great. Out of curiosity is there an alternative to rsync for large files? I believe I looked all over the web for answers and I found "partial" answers and just

I'm about to deploy a new directory since I had only one Windows Server 2019 DC and its storage died out (specifically, a block/page where part of ntdis.dit happened to be stored because I was able to rescue everything else. amazing) Anyways, this time around I definitely need to have a backup DC. I planned to have Windows be the primary DC and samba be the backup. I wanted to know what

Greetings ... Been lurking on the list for some time, hoping that at some point, I might be able to add to the collective (Yes, way to much StarTrek in the background! ) ... I have learn quite a bit by just lurking, but now I think I might have something to add ... I'm not sure the exact protocol or procedure for this and it's late in the evening and would like get this out, before I

I've Managed to over write my MBR and offcourse all my partions are gone (stupid me). i kept a backup of my MBR but silly me it's on the same disk that died. i have a rescue disk is there any way i can read from /dev/hda and go through the whole disk (RAW DATA) searching for "mbr backup file" and then read it. I am using EXT3 with slackware 8.1/RH 7.2 I am sorry my spelling is

On 9/16/13 9:44 AM, Nicolas Michel wrote: > Thanks for you help. I also tried adding some other informations as you suggest: > I can also take into account: > - "Reserved block count: XXXXXXX" from tune2fs that gives me the > number of blocks reserved for root > - Reserved GDT blocks: XXX > > But I didn't thought about the FS journal. How can I gather

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [Please CC me on answers, I'm not subscribed] Hi everyone, I have got a hard disk which was damaged by a fall and would like to recover a few files from that. (There is a backup for most of the data, but a handful of recent files are missing. These are important enough to spend some time on them, but not for paying a professional data recovery

On 9/16/13 5:16 AM, Nicolas Michel wrote: > Hello guys, > > I have some difficulties to understand what really are the numbers > behing "df" and tune2fs. You'll find the output of tune2fs and df > below, on which my maths are based. > > Here are my maths: > > A tune2fs on an ext3 FS tell me the FS size is 3284992 block large. It > also tell me that

Hi all, i'm new in the list so i'm sorry if this i'm posting is off-topic or it was already answered before. I'm having this problem; i've got an ext3 8GB partition and it doesn't mount, the cause of this: a user (yes me!) running fsck.ext3 with the filesystem mounted, ups! (snif, forgive me!!, totally newbie and mad) errors while booting: EXT3_fs error (device hda4):

Hi you don't need a Windows-DC it's much better and easier if you set up both DCs with the same OS. 4.19 comes with FL 2016 (if you need it). The GPOs work absolutely the same as with a windows DC. You can use RSAT to do it. Stefan Am 19.01.24 um 22:07 schrieb Mikel P?rez via samba: > I'm about to deploy a new directory since I had only one Windows > Server 2019 DC and its

Hello, i posted a question about a possible ext3fs bug a few month ago. I see this kernel-msg in the messages: Oct 8 18:30:00 o5s kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,10)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 Oct 8 18:35:00 o5s kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,10)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 Oct 8 18:40:00 o5s kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,10)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 they repead

In fact the thing I really want to achieve is to be able to find the values and the algorithm that enable me to reproduce the percentage given by df (and to understand deeply what it means). Why do I need it? Because I'm trying to write some script to do capacity planning and space problem forecast. Currently I don't really know which values I should use to do it. (I could use the

Hello guys, I have some difficulties to understand what really are the numbers behing "df" and tune2fs. You'll find the output of tune2fs and df below, on which my maths are based. Here are my maths: A tune2fs on an ext3 FS tell me the FS size is 3284992 block large. It also tell me that the size of one block is 4096 (bytes if I'm not wrong?). So my maths tell me that the disk

Hi, I have a 20GB partition on a hard disk that just developed bad blocks. Fortunately, I had backups for the most important data on it, but I'd like to recover some files that were too large to backup. When running 'e2fsck /dev/hdc3', I get the following message: e2fsck 1.27 (8-Mar-2002) Group descriptors look bad... trying backup blocks... e2fsck: Invalid argument while checking

I was playing around with btrfs, and did a mkfs.btrfs on one of my partition. Mistakes, it was my data partition (ext3 based). I have not yet mounted the device, but the mkfs.btrfs continued to completion. Is it possible to salvage my ext3 filesystem? Anyway to reverse the effect of mkfs.btrfs? Thank you for your help/answer. -- Regards, Peter Teoh

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi, a good friend of mine had some trouble with his fs yesterday. i have some details now and wonder if you have some thoughts on it, even it may turn out not to be an ext3 issue at all. sorry, the post is a bit too long: the ext3 fs was running for several months now on a RAID controller. due to a user error, the RAID controller decided to rebuild

I have a damaged Ext3 filesystem which fsck has not been able to recover. If I try to mount it, I get a message like this in dmesg: EXT3-fs error (device sda1): ext3_free_blocks_sb: bit already cleared for block 2370866 If I try fsck on it, I get a series of messages like this: Inode bitmap for group 0 is not in group. (block 0) Relocate<y>? Up to group 95. Some say

I have backup problem of redhat 7.2 with ext3 file system. I'm using dump for backup. The problem is one of the filesystem (/proj) Incremantal backup is not happening. The command used is dump -u1a -f /dev/st0 /dev/md0 Daily its taking the entire file system backup eventhough i tried incremental. This is happening only for /proj and proj1 is working fine. Filesystem Size