similar to: Mac OS X + Samba + NT = Snag

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Mac OS X + Samba + NT = Snag"

1998 Jun 25
0
Final touches to SAMBA: help please
I am running a sparc 20 with Solaris 2.5.1. I am trying to attach 95 an NT4 machines to it. I got the compiled Samba off the net somewhere and did a pkgadd. It installed fine. I have read the man pages and the FAQ, and run the tests on the UNIX side and all are fine. FYI, these are: smbclient -L nmblookup -B (on server and client) nmblookup -d 2 '*' nmbclient '\\av\tmp' (av is
2000 Jun 26
0
samba 207 on solaris - idiot newbie questions
Hello all. I've decided to try using samba on our Solaris systems to give users who are stuck with PCs on their desks access to our gis data. I obtained a compiled binary package of version 2.0.7 from one of the samba.org sites, and have installed SAMBAroot, SAMBAusr, SAMBAman, and SAMBAdoc. All apparently worked just fine. I've made a couple of changes to the smb.conf file, changing
1999 Dec 06
1
nmbd won't run
I am having a hard time getting samba 2.0.4b running on a Sparc20 running Solaris 2.5.1. I have swat and smbd running, but not nmbd. I have tried all the stuff in diagnostics.txt and have searched the archives but am still stuck. I have tried to gather some useful info, in the hopes that some on this list will be able to figure this out. Thanks in advance. Here are the results of some of the
2005 Jan 17
1
Unable to view samba shares
Hi list. I'm new to this list, so please bear with me. I've got samba 2.2.8a on Solaris 9 (SPARC). I've run all the tests. testparm runs fine. Other tests: # nmblookup -B stage __SAMBA__ querying __SAMBA__ on 192.168.18.25 192.168.18.25 __SAMBA__<00> # # nmblookup -B 192.168.1.9 '*' querying * on 192.168.1.9 192.168.1.9 *<00> # # nmblookup -d 2 '*'
2005 Jul 23
2
CentOS 4 snag with htaccess
I'm hitting a snag with htaccess. Have created .htaccess and .htpasswd files, set up apache directory options just like always... the exact same setup works fine on CentOS 3, but I can't seem to get it to authenticate on CentOS 4? Am I just being blind stupid (as in not seeing something 'exactly the same') or is there something different I'm missing? I have selinux running
2004 Nov 10
0
nmblookup failing
Hi, I can't get "net view \\<servername>" to work from my Windows test client. It fails with "The network path was not found". I followed some of the online debugging guides and have found that a couple of the test nmblookups on the server are failing. The server is named 'fileserver1' and its IP address is 155.2.196.251 for the purpose of this email.
2010 Nov 17
2
Snag installing CentOS in a VirtualBox VM
I spent most of the evening trying to boot a new install of CentOS in a VirtualBox VM. The VM recognizes the install DVD, runs it, asks for me to boot it and I type in <return> (or any number of other combinations, all of which fail in exactly the same way) and it continues to run up to the point shown in the attached screenshot. I've tried numerous different combinations of device
2013 Mar 21
0
[LLVMdev] Hit a snag while attempting to write a backend - any advice?
Hi Lee, > let isReturn = 1, isTerminator = 1, isBarrier = 1 in > { > def RET : BitscuitInst<(outs),(ins),"JMP\tR6",[(Bitscuit_return)]>; > > def JMP : BitscuitInst<(outs), (ins jmptarget:$dst),"JMP\t$dst",[(br > bb:$dst)]>; > } Ah! It looks like the isReturn is to blame then. LLVM is presumably going through adding an implicit use of any
2013 Mar 21
0
[LLVMdev] Hit a snag while attempting to write a backend - any advice?
Hi Lee, > Massive thanks, I've been staring at this problem for so long I was beginning to go a little stir crazy. No worries. I know how annoying it can be trying to fix these problems. "isBarrier" is the one that usually got me. > Out of interest is there a good explanation of the various isterminator etc flags anywhere? The best I know of is
2007 Mar 28
2
windows clients can't see workgroup at all
I'm trying to troubleshoot a new samba setup on a tiny network, and I'm clearly missing something. I'm running Samba 3.0.22 on Ubuntu Linux. When I first set it up, it seemed to go so smoothly. I changed all the workstations to the same workgroup (RABNETWORK) and they could see each other and the server, but they couldn't open anything on the server. I don't really understand
2003 Jan 02
1
apparent w2ksp3 problem
Believe me, I have tried everytbing I can think of to solve this problem. I will work my tail off to resolve this but I am fresh out of ideas. Any suggestions would be GREATLY appreciated. Here are the details... problem: server can see machines/shares on clients but clients cannot see machines/shares on server workgroup/domain: golgerth no router server: rpms: kernel 2.4.18.19.8.0
2006 Feb 10
1
Question on AIX 5.2, Samba and NT domains
Environment: AIX 5.2 Samba 3.0.21b (compiled at this site with Visualage C/C++ 6.0) configure was run as: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba --with-pam --with-acl-support --with-aio-support --with-winbind Windows environment is a mix of Windows NT domain and Novell file servers. Does anybody know of a single document or set of documents that have a "cookbook"
2008 Jul 26
0
smbclient ( 3.0.31 ) can not connect to 3.2.0 server and vice versa
This is getting real tough to debug. titan : Solaris 8 running samba 3.0.31 aequitas : OpenSolaris running samba 3.2.0 I can do basics test just fine : # /usr/xpg4/bin/date -u;/opt/csw/bin/findsmb Sat Jul 12 22:50:51 GMT 2008 *=DMB +=LMB IP ADDR NETBIOS NAME WORKGROUP/OS/VERSION
2003 Feb 11
1
Samba running, but nobody can see shares
Samba not responding to broadcast calls from networked PCs. Short: My Redhat Linux 8.0 box is not replying to udp broadcasts, and I can't figure out why. Network: The offending Redhat 8.0 Linux Box (//DS) attempting to run Samba 2.2.7 Firewall Redhat 7.3 (//IW) successfully running Samba 2.2.4 Win98 (//MS) Win2k (//SL) <Not running at the time of these tests> Very long: I've
2005 Jan 04
0
FC2 to FC3 Upgrade help
Hi All, Due to a hard-disc crash, I have just upgraded from a working Samba setup running in FC2 to a non-functional Samba setup running in FC3. The Windows XP machine has not changed, but won't connect. Samba is fully up2date from the FC3 repositories. smb.conf [global] workgroup = MYGROUP server string = Samba Server hosts deny = ALL hosts allow = 192.168.1.0/24 127.
2013 Jul 03
0
samba 4 installation failing several troubleshooting steps
Troubleshooting steps fail. Trying to replace a standalone Netware server with a Samba4 server with AD. To isolate this test setup, changed server's static IP address and separated the wiring. Then went through the Troubleshooting portion of The Samba Checklist. Some tests pass. Some tests fail. I'm weak on Samba, DNS and AD. I appreciate your instructions on how to overcome the
2001 Jan 12
0
name resolution & samba problem
> Maybe there isn't a glibc version (although > it shouldn't be hard to port the Solaris version to >glibc). I will try to port nss_wins to glibc. I made some changes to smb.conf and follow the tests described in Samba diagnosis (www.samba.org/samba/docs/diagnosis.html) smb.conf [global] workgroup = NETMANAGER server string = Deltacom Samba Server printcap name =
2007 Nov 20
2
No longer able to browse windows share via Nautilus
I used to be able to browse the windows shares on the network through Nautilus. I can see them as computers, but when I click on them, it fails. (I'm on Ubuntu 6 LTS, AMD64) About 3 months ago, this failed. But, the windows boxes can all still access my shares on my Linux box. I was going through the trouble shooting, and found this out, but I'm not sure what to do next. I am
2008 Aug 07
1
smbclient failed --> NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME
I make all steps in the guide: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/install.html#id2546028 but command (exetuded in the same computer where is samba): smbclient //fc9/tester -Utester%test gives error: Domain=[DZTI] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.2.0-17.fc9] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME The user tester have been created by commands: useradd tester smbpasswd -a
1999 Jul 09
0
Multiple configuration problem
I'm having a perplexing problem with a multiple configuration setup. My setup was working fine until I changed the IP address of my server. Since then, Samba has been misbehaving. All other networking processes are working fine so I don't believe it to be a o/s issue on the system. The system is running Solaris 2.6 using Samba 2.0. My client and the server are on the same TCP/IP class, a