similar to: files' last modification time in samba-2.0.6

On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 18:42 +0100, Olly Betts wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 03:26:00PM +0200, R. Mattes wrote: > > is there any way to retrieve the last modification time from > > a Xapian::Database object? > > Not via the API. For disk based databases, it's the latest modification > time of any "base" file in the database directory. That's true for

Hello, I'm using Samba 2.0.6 on a newly installed SMP machine with SuSE Linux 6.2. Apparantly this Samba version does not allow any network clients to change the file modification times on remote files, as this is done by several directory synchronization tools (I personally use "filesync" to synchronize between my notebook and the server). On another Linux machine (Samba 2.0.5a on

Hi all, The call to: library(rJava) Results in the following warning massage: Warning message: In inDL(x, as.logical(local), as.logical(now), ...) : DLL attempted to change FPU control word from 8001f to 9001f After some searching I found the following explanation: > R expects all calls to DLLs (including the initializing call) to leave the > FPU control word unchanged. Many run-time

I have had the same problem: Shared files, not owned by the user in question, were being deleted and re-written upon saving the file. Because Excel only gives user (not group) permission, it will muck up access for other users in the group. In my case, I was not enforcing anything (when the problem occurred) and my .conf only had the bare minimum of information, I also used method 3, but put a

Whenever you use --times (included in --archive) rsync will fix incorrect time stamps. The only thing --size-only is doing is keeping the incorrect data instead of replacing it. The purpose of these options is to "fix" a copy done in a way that did not preserve timestamps but the data is known to have not changed. These options allow rsync to correct the incorrect timestamps without

Hi all, I am using rsync to synchronize across two different filesystems (one is an sshfs mount, while the other one is an xfs). I am synchronizing from the xfs to the sshfs one. The xfs filesystem has a sub-second resolution for modification timestamps, while the sshfs one has a 1-second resolution. My synchronization are always rather slow. When investigating why, I realized that rsync is

Hello Everyone! Perhaps some of you have some advice for dealing with this problem? I've done quite a bit of googling on this one, but I can't find anything useful. Ever since I started using Samba as PDC, I have had this problem: when users merely open MS-Excel files on samba shares, the file's Last-Modification date is incremented to the current time. I have seen similar

>From the online document of ZFS On-Disk Specification, I found there is a field named "dd_parent_obj" in dsl_dir_phys_t. will this field be modified or kept unchanged during snapshot COW? For example, consider a ZFS filesytem mounted on /myzfs, which contains 2 subdirs(A and B). If we do the following steps: 1) create a snapshot named /myzfs at now. 2) rename /myzfs/A to

Hello all, we are experiencing problems with samba 2.0.6 and the MKS touch command. during our builds, we touch files and directories so that our make dependencies work correctly. Unfortunately, it seems that MKS' touch.exe doesn't actually change the time stamp of a file or directory. The command returns without an error, but the timestamp does not change. The same problem exists

I am using a Samba 3.0.21a share to centrally access my source code from multiple Windows workstations. Everything works as expected (in Samba), but there is a slight (but annoying) problem with the modification timestamp of the files on the Samba share. While I have verified that both server and workstation are synchronized to the same time (using NTP), it seems that there is a few milliseconds

How exactly does rsync determine that the copy has the incorrect timestamp and not the source file? Does it assume that the copy must be incorrect or are there other criteria that have to be considered? Quoting Kevin Korb via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org>: > Whenever you use --times (included in --archive) rsync will fix > incorrect time stamps. The only thing --size-only is

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8818 Summary: Add --out-format escape for file modification time as UNIX timestamp (seconds since epoch) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

I often get warnings like the following when running R CMD check [...] * checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK * checking tests ... make: *** Warning: File `Makevars' has modification time in the future (2001-11-13 12:54:37.381546042 > 2001-11-13 12:54:37.314975985) [...] I am ready to believe that this is not a bug (i.e., that the timing on my various machines and file

When I copy an old file to a share the motification time is not changed. Ok, the file has not been modified but since it is new to this share I like to change it's time to the copy time! There MUST be an option to do this!But I haven't found it yet :( Can anyone help? -- Torsten

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Tal Lubko <tallubko at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Gene > > > It took me some time to check all the things you've asked. > Hope you still remember the case... > > 1) Compiling SYSLINUX with -j1 didn't help. > > The first error message I get is about missing header file. > I'll try to play a little bit with it to make it

Hi all, I'm new to the list, so please be patient with me. Samba 2.0.7 is running on a compaq alpha server es40 with tru64 4.D. We got a problem with powerpoint files on a samba share. As soon as I open a powerpoint file on a samba share the modification time of the file changes, even if I'm not changing anything whithin the file. This only happens if I open *.ppt files which where

Hello list, is there any way to retrieve the last modification time from a Xapian::Database object? TIA Ralf Mattes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL:

Hello, For a portal I'm working on, I need to know if changing the unicodePwd attr with LDAP also updates pwdLastSet (so the account doesn't get locked). It seems the answer is yes, but the value I get from pwdLastSet is somewhat weird: pwdLastSet: 130753269490000000 That is Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:31:34 GMT Why? Is that epoch or something else? Is there anything else I need to update when

On 06/05/15 15:59, ?? wrote: > Thanks Rowland. That makes sense :-) > > BTW, Is the following code enough to change the password with python-ldap? > > con.sasl_interactive_bind_s("", sasl_auth) > mod_attrs = [ > (ldap.MOD_REPLACE, 'unicodePwd', new_password), > (ldap.MOD_REPLACE, 'unicodePwd', new_password) > ] >

More testing, and your other validations are correct. Installed 3.0.11pre2 on a clean box, with our production configurations. The following was verified to function correctly with Excel (open file, close file, copy file, move file): [test] path = /data/test comment = Stuff writable = yes browseable = no valid users = @"DOMAIN\RFPAdmins" write list =