similar to: Samba on vxfs

Has anyone had any experience with ssh and DG/UX? I tried the ./configure and it could not determine the hosttype. After that problem was worked-arounded I get a LOT of warnings about declaring functions multiple times and then the compile fails with: packet.c: In function `packet_set_interactive': packet.c:803: `IPTOS_LOWDELAY' undeclared (first use this function) packet.c:803: (Each

Hi Folks.. We have started to convert our Veritas clustered systems over to ZFS root to take advantage of the extreme simplification of using Live Upgrade. Moving the data of these systems off VxVM and VxFS is not in scope for reasons to numerous to go into.. One thing my customers noticed immediately was a reduction in "free" memory as reported by ''top''. By way

Hi, sorry if I am brining up old news, but I couldn''t find a good answer searching the previous posts (My mom always says I am bad with finding things :) However I noticed a difference when creating a zfs filesystem compared with a vxfs filesystem in the available size. ie. ZFS zonedata/zfs [b]392G[/b] 120G 272G 31% /zfs VxFS /dev/vx/dsk/zonedg/zonevol

Hello Gurus, Greetings. I have been assigned some work on the development of a migration tool. The requirement is that it has to migrate the data on a UFS/VxFs filesystem to an ext2 filesystem. What are the technical apects I will have to look into to achieve the same? Is it possible to change the on-disk structure of the UFS/VxFs filesystem to an ext2 filesystem? The question may

We are looking at the alternatives to VXVM/VXFS. One of the feature which we liked in Veritas, apart from the obvious ones is the ability to call the disks by name and group them in to a disk group. Especially in SAN based environment where the disks may be shared by multiple machines, it is very easy to manage them by disk group names rather than cxtxdx numbers. Does zfs offer such

Hello experts, We have a large implementation of Symantec Netbackup 6.0 with disk staging. Today, the customer is using VxFS as file system inside Netbackup 6.0 DSSU (disk staging). The customer would like to know if it is best to use ZFS or VxFS as file system inside Netbackup disk staging in order to get the best performance possible. Could you provide some information regarding this

HI, The question is a ZFS performance question in reguards to SAN traffic. We are trying to benchmark ZFS vx VxFS file systems and I get the following performance results. Test Setup: Solaris 10: 11/06 Dual port Qlogic HBA with SFCSM (for ZFS) and DMP (of VxFS) Sun Fire v490 server LSI Raid 3994 on backend ZFS Record Size: 128KB (default) VxFS Block Size: 8KB(default) The only thing

To ensure that future releases of portable OpenSSH are as bug-free as possible, we need to recruit a team of testers. Each tester would be responsible for a particular OS platform and would be called upon to test snapshots before they are marked as official releases. The release would not go out until it had been given the OK by testers on each supported platform. A corollary of this is that

Hi - a question for all ye rsync guru's out there... I have a need to migrate some fairly large Oracle datafiles from a UFS filesystem to VxFS (VERITAS), however I am not being allowed nearly enough outage time to perform a standard file copy migration. The datafiles (of which there are about 4 are about 50GB each in size and on separate UFS filesystems. I am considering instigating a local

Sometime back it was mentioned in a presentation we had that there might be a tool to convert an existing VxFS file system to ZFS without the need to do a lot of manual copying of files, or downtime for an application, etc. Does anyone know whether this is correct and whether it will be available when ZFS is incorporated into a GA''d Solaris 10 update??? This message posted from

Hi, rsync was running against filesystems /disk5 and /disk7 to back them onto remote server (172.16.101.4) using the following script: if [ `ps -ef | grep -v grep | grep ::d5 | /usr/bin/wc -l` -eq 0 ] then rm -f /etc/rsync5.log echo " --- Disk5 --- starts `date`" > /etc/rsync5.log /usr/local/bin/rsync -a --recursive --compress /disk5/ 172.16.101.4::d5 >> /etc/rsync.log echo

Is it possible to use DTrace to display the number of arguments and their types for userland or kernel functions that are not explicitly instrumented or documented by their authors? We''re talking about functions provided by Veritas VxVM/VxFS and the like, and for example, we might want to try tracing I/Os from App => VxFS => VxVM => ssd driver to see where I/Os get aggregated or

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Damjan Perenic<damjan.perenic at guest.arnes.si> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Richard > Elling<richard.elling at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Aug 11, 2009, at 7:39 AM, Ed Spencer wrote: >> >>> I suspect that if we ''rsync'' one of these filesystems to a second >>> server/pool ?that we would

I''m an Oracle DBA, a dtrace noob, and I''m attempting to resolve an Oracle write performance problem on Solaris 10, Oracle 9iR2. The Oracle DBWR processes have poor write throughput writing to VxFS files. I suspect that the problem may be with POSIX readers/writer file locking. Ideally I''d like to identify, for a given DBWR process, readers/writer file lock contention

Hi. I''m managing a HDS storage system which is slightly larger than 100 TB and we have used approx. 3/4. We use vxfs. The storage system is attached to a solaris 9 on sparc via a fiberswitch. The storage is shared via nfs to our webservers. If I was to replace vxfs with zfs I could utilize raidz(2) instead of the built-in hardware raid-controller. Are there any jbod-only storage

> ZFS 11.0 on Solaris release 06/06, hangs systems when > trying to copy files from my VXFS 4.1 file system. > any ideas what this problem could be?. What kind of system is that? How much memory is installed? I''m able to hang an Ultra 60 with 256 MByte of main memory, simply by writing big files to a ZFS filesystem. The problem happens with both Solaris 10 6/2006 and Solaris

> -----Original Message----- > From: Ramadurai, Sangeetha (MED) > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:02 PM > To: 'samba@samba.org' > Cc: Ramadurai, Sangeetha (MED) > Subject: CIFS mount problem on Linux > > hi, > I have a SUN machine running samba server. The vxfs shares on this machine is shared thru samba server > SUN Machine -- SunOS 5.8

FYI... I've just posted a snapshot of the current SAMBA_2_2 source code (tagged release-2-2-6pre2). This includes all of the post 2.2.5 printing fixes as well as fixing some other bugs (such as VxFS quota support). Please test and report back your experience. There have been some updates to the Mandrake packaging thanks to Buchan. We are not building RPMS or *debs for this pre-release.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We're getting ready to start work with Oracle 9iRAC on Red Hat Advanced Server 2.1. One thing I'm curious about, that I haven't found an answer for in the docs, is how to handle partition resizing with OCFS. We have found on our Oracle 8i/Solaris systems that we have the need on occasion to expand partitions to make room for more

Hi Team, I have doubt on samba and nfs co-existence on a server. I have read couple of posts in the internet and found that nfs and samba doesn't understand file locking mechanisms of each other. Following is my requirement I have a vxfs filesystem /interfaces which is exported to 3 unix servers using nfs Now the customer, wants to export /interfaces/outbound to 4 windows servers using