similar to: Unsolicited oplock breaks

Dear All, We are seeing the following warning messages in event logs on PCs that are accessing a Samba server (Solaris 2.7, samba 2.0.6):- 03/03/04/2001,14:44:04,Rdr,Warning,None,3025,N/A,CIS-C033-04,A write-behind operation has failed to the remote server ilex. The data contains the amount requested to write and the amount actually written. What does this message actually mean? Does it

Dear All, we are experiencing severe problems with Samba 2.2.0 (with quota support) running on a dual processor (400MHz) Sun E450 running Solaris 2.7. This is used as a central file server for student diskspace, accessed by approx 1200 PCs running NT 4. Up until recently we experienced some, what we assume to be, loading issues with connections during the middle of the day being slow.

I've used oplocks = no for a long time now, because of the famous "oplock_break" error, but I decided to give 2.0.7 a try. I still get "oplock break" errors as before, but this time I got a new error too: [2000/05/02 10:04:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(976) oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file XXXXX/xxxxxx/mailbox.pst

Hello, I'm running a samba 3.0.14a server in production on a fedora core 3 (kernel 2.6.9-1.667smp) with a least 250 clients (XP Pro SP2) (up to 400 sometimes). A few days ago, a problem appeared with a soft that we are using for a long time. (Petit Robert, a french dictionnary). When someone launch the dictionnary, many clients are freezed when they try to access to the "start

I'm running Samba 2.0.4b on a E450 running Solaris 7 which acts as a diskspace server for students, normally everything runs quite smoothly with numbers of connections in the region of about 800/900. Then every now and again students will start seeing their connections being lost and others will not get a connection when they log in, looking at the system shows no obvious problems, except

I'm running Samba 2.0.4b on a E450 running Solaris 7 which acts as a diskspace server for students, normally everything runs quite smoothly with numbers of connections in the region of about 800/900. Then every now and again students will start seeing their connections being lost and others will not get a connection when they log in, looking at the system shows no obvious problems, except

When trying to delete or copy over certain files on my Samba server, Windows hangs for some time and then gives "access denied". I can delete these files directly from the server, so it's a Samba or Windows problem. There seems to be nothing special about these files, other than that Samba doesn't like touching them. Upon checking the Samba logs, I find this message or

We are trying to troubleshoot slow performance. A lot of my NT client log files show messages like this about oplock break issues. [2003/10/09 12:50:39, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(1008) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 2907 on port 61752 for dev = 40240002, inode = 29, file_id = 2 64 [2003/10/09 12:51:03, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(395) process_local_message:

We've been having some problems where connections are being lost to our 2.0.4b Samba machine, the specifics of which are in a different post. To add to the problems we find there is a problem with particularly Word and also some other programs, with the file in memory getting corrupted when the connection is lost. If a user loads a Word document from there Samba share and then the

I'm trying to set up a way that our users can send an XMPP message to Asterisk (unsolicited) to request information, such as voicemail status or the like. No matter what I set for the dialplan, I'm only seeing Asterisk execute the s,1 priority in the context defined in xmpp.conf for incoming messages, and then the "call" hangs up without executing further instructions. Anything

hi, i am getting unsolicited NOTIFY messages from Asterisk after the subscription. Is this type of NOTIFY messages is supported in any of the RFCs..? Because, the SIP stack with 3265 compliance, does not support any such NOTIFY messages and discarding those. I need the justification for this kind of NOTIFY messages sent by Asterisk. I need your valuable inputs... Thanks in Advance, Subashini

Giulio Orsero wrote: > I've used > oplocks = no > for a long time now, because of the famous "oplock_break" error, but I > decided to give 2.0.7 a try. > [ snip ..] > > - the server is linux 2.2.14/samba2.0.7; it's not the server where I > used to made oplock_break tests. It's another one on another lan. It's > used almost exclusively to store

Dear All, I'm running SAMBA 2.0.5a on a Sun 450 running Solaris 7. In the past I've had an occasional problem with processes running amok and causing the server to grind to a halt, which I've put down to network glitches as they seemed to coincide with problems on the network. But today I've had 3 instances where the number of smbd processes has just steadily increased until

I've just come across a problem that had me baffled for a bit. We supply students with diskspace via a Solaris machine running Samba (2.0.6). Yesterday, I got a report that a couple of students could not access their diskspace, although at login time the drive was getting mapped. The problem was that if they tried to view the contents of the directory (explorer or dir) the process would

I have a level 10 debug of the smbd/oplock process_local_message problem but can still not figure out what causes the unknown UDP message command code. I checked the source but could only see that this is an invalid opcode command. Anyone a clue what is happening here ? Might wrong opcode commands crash samba ? Peter [2003/09/04 11:50:12, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch

The second instance of Quickbooks shows a "file may be corrupt" message. 56310 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR EXCLUSIVE+BATCH /MY_REALLY_LONG_PATH/My File.QBW Thu Mar 3 19:42:20 2005 56310 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR EXCLUSIVE+BATCH / MY_REALLY_LONG_PATH/My File.QBI Thu Mar 3 19:42:20 2005 It works on Windows - just copied the same file to a network mapped windows

We've just set up a number of linux servers to access our AD server (Windows server 2008) and now have to set up a Solaris server. I've downloaded, compiled and install Samba (3.4.2), configured kerberos and am now trying to get it to join the AD. I get the following error: samba-3.4.2/source3# net ads join -U username Enter username's password: [2009/10/13 13:10:42, 0]

Dear all, I have set up one unprivileged Domain-1 with help of FedoraQuickStart and some help from you. Now I want to install some other OS to Domain-2. How can I install a different OS (say Redhat 7.3) onto a unprivileged domain? Do I have to copy all files from an existed installation to an image file? Thanks, Koala _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Are any plans for an API that would allow ZFS commands including snapshot/rollback integrated with customer''s application? Thanks, Cherry

hi. for domain migration, this is an obvious procedure in order to announce the relocation of the guest being bridged on a different host. i''ve been grepping around the xen build tree to see whether and where this is covered. haven''t found anything yet. is this covered by linux kernel bridging already, or is it just missing [read: left as a scripting exercise to