similar to: Samba & IPv6???

Hi, is there any way to setup samba accounts (which then use a common share) but do not have a unix account? the scenario is, that I want to support a goup of users who have an "samba account" on my linux box and can use a certain part of the filesystem as file server. But I don't want to give them a unix account to ease user management and avoid, that they can use other services

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7368 Summary: Support --link-dest when receiving from a old version Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy:

Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Joerg Schilling > <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > > > >> > Do you like to discuss things or do you like to throw smoke grenades? > >> > >> The only thing I'd like to discuss is your reason for not adding a > >> dual

Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Joerg Schilling > <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > >>> > >> Yes, if you mean what is described here as 'the original 4-clause' > >> license, or BSD-old: > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses > > > > Do you like to

Hello, Firstly THANK YOU for the IPv6 NAT support merged in 6.5. It has been almost impossible to get IPv6 into a VM on a laptop that switches between wifi and wired (dock) connections, because you can not add a wifi interface to a bridge. I know NAT is against the IPv6 end-to-end xen but it makes this "just work" for the vast majority of people like me who need to ssh/curl/talk to

<m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Ah. I don't remember if I was using csh, or ksh, and didn't realize about > bash. I *think* I vaguely remember that sh seemed to be more capable than > I remembered. If you like to check what the Bourne Shell did support in the late 1980s, I recommend you to fetch recent Schily tools from:

Used steps on sysctl from?Centos7 FAQ (https://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS7)?and some gathered on internet # cat /etc/sysctl.d/90-disable_ipv6.conf? net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 net.ipv6.conf.default.disable_ipv6=1 net.ipv6.conf.eth0.disable_ipv6=1 net.ipv6.conf.eth1.disable_ipv6=1 net.ipv6.conf.all.use_tempaddr=0 net.ipv6.conf.all.autoconf=0 net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_ra=0

Hello Samba Community, I've couple of questions regarding IPv6 link-local address support with Samba4. Is Samba4 suppose to listen on IPv6 link-local address? With following lines in smb.conf, smbd listens on IPv4 and IPv6 global address but not on IPv6 link-local address assigned on eth0. bind interfaces only = yes interfaces = lo eth0 On the same Linux box, Samba-3.5 used

On 03/06/2015 10:55 AM, Barry Brimer wrote: > > >> IPV6INIT="no" >> >> But I am still getting a global IPv6 (and of course local scope). >> >> What else do I need to do to disable the listening for RA announcements >> >> and setting an IPv6 global address? I do not want to reboot the box. > There are other modules, most notably bonding

Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/27/2015 12:28 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > Up to now, nobody could explain me how a mixture of GPL and BSD can be legal as > > this would require (when following the GPL) to relicense the BSD code under GPL > > in order to make the whole be under GPL. > > The GPL doesn't require that you relicense

Hello all, Can anyone give me a hint on how to specify an IPv6 address in an rsync address literal - the colon character is already used to seperate the host name from the remote directory AFAICT... I get, e.g. rsync -Cavb 3ffe:502:420:120::2:/home/cam/dev/proj 3ffe: Unknown host rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code

Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Joerg Schilling > <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > > > >> > "as a whole" means generally BUT allowing for exceptions. > >> > >> OK, great. That clears it up then. > > > > Maybe this helps: > > >

Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Joerg Schilling > <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > > > I would be interested to understand why Heirloom seems to so well known and my > > portability attempts seem to be widely unknown. > > > > Not sure why it matters with a standalone

Hi, I am running package libvirt-0.9.11.6-1.fc17.x86_64 on a kernel-3.6.5-1.fc17.x86_64 Fedora 17. I have set up the host with an IPv6 address, and I made some successfull tests transferring in IPv6 mode to/from other hosts. I want to set up libvirt to get an IPv6 address for his local network interface, same for the guests. I want the guests to be able to communicate directly on the

I have just moved a host from a network that supports static IPv4 and IPv6. The IPv4 addr is set in ifcfg-eth0, and the IPv6 via RA (I set the MAC so I get an IPv6 addr that I like). I just moved the host to a network that supports static IPv4, but only dymanic IPv6, so at this time (until I get static IPv6), I need to disable the global IPv6 addressing. So in the ifcfg-eth0 file I set:

Hi Joachim, > Op 15 feb 2024 om 23:09 heeft Joachim Lindenberg via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > > ?Hi Rowland, > No, I don?t have so many devices yet. Rowland believes that one should not use IPv6 internally. Many disagree. > But I know some organizations that want to switch to IPv6 consistently and you can rephrase my question to whether

Hi, I looked at CVS and this mailing list and didn't find anything regarding IPv6 support. I found old patches from KAME and one IPv6-only implementation (http://www.bugfactory.org/~gav/ipv6/icecast-1.3.11-ipv6.diff.gz) only. Therefore I decided to do this work again and as good as possible. I integrated IPv6 into configure script which allows to use te same code both for IPv4 and IPv6

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > On 03/06/2015 11:00 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> >> >> On 03/06/2015 10:55 AM, Barry Brimer wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> IPV6INIT="no" >>>> >>>> But I am still getting a global IPv6 (and of course local scope).

After upgrading one of our servers from Fedora 7 to Fedora 9, from Samba 3.0 to 3.2.0-2.17.fc9 I noticed this strange phenomena: Windows 2003 and XP clients freeze when you type "\\server" in an explorer address bar where "server" is the name of the Samba 3.2 host. Windows 2000 clients don't freeze. 2003/XP clients don't freeze when you enter

Hello, I use Samba AD in Version 4.8.3 and would like to run it on IPv4 und IPv6 in order to be able to have Samba acting as IPv6 DNS Server. However since I have problem with sysprep domain join as soon as Samba advertises its own Domain Controller Hostname as IPv4 and IPv6 address, I would like to tell Samba to run on both protocols but only resolve to an IPv4 address. So in short: When I