similar to: proliferation of SAMBA links in W2K

Hi, i'm having a serious problem with the following logon-script. It works under W2k, but not under W98, although W98 tells it is running startup-script .. First my smb.conf (only interesting parts) : ---snipp--- [global] server string = Samba-PDC %v on %h workgroup = WORKGROUP encrypt passwords = yes netbios name = 486dx66 domain master = Yes

Hi there, I have the following problem and I hope somebody might help me. First of all: I am using WinXP SP3 (english and/or german) with R in Version 2.10.0. Now I am trying to install some packages but unfortunately I am getting a weird error. No matter which package I am trying to install - I nearly get the same error. It looks like this:

Ok here is something I couldn't see on the description page. We need to convert to 8 bit audio right? I'm assuming narrow band is 8 KHz 8 bit. Wide band is 16 KHz 8 bit. UW band is 32 KHz 8 bit audio? George -----Original Message----- From: Tom Grandgent [mailto:tgrand@canvaslink.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 11:42 AM To: Bertie Coopersmith; George Ou Cc: speex-dev@xiph.org

Please consider using 16-bit 16kHz (wideband) instead. It's a huge increase in audio quality and the bitrate is still very low, especially if you take advantage of Speex features such as VBR. 8kHz seems totally inappropriate to me for desktop streaming audio, let alone 8-bit samples. Or perhaps your recording equipment is an original Sound Blaster from 1989? (Even that could record at

This is a really good point, and definitely a recurring theme on this mailing list. :) I wonder, what are some better options for handling this issue, other than to keep saying "just use 8/16/32kHz"? - Extend Speex to support other sample rates (seems unlikely..?) - Integrate a resampling algorithm into libspeex - Maintain a list of recommended resampling libraries that work well

Hi Neil / Thorsten, The full test result is attached. Thanks and Regards, Anil ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- root at genericarmv8:~/anilss/AArch64/mksh_44-1/mksh# ./mksh test.sh -p $PWD/mksh Testing mksh for conformance: # $MirOS: src/bin/mksh/check.t,v 1.599 2013/02/24 14:22:41 tg Exp $

I have this: class foo::foobar ($version) { } which is called like this: class facility::sanjose inherits facility::common { class { foo::foobar: version => "1.3.13" } } puppet complains with this on the client: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: Error 400 on SERVER: Could not find parent resource type ''facility::sanjose'' of type hostclass in

On 8/25/20 3:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >>> -      keys[optind] = strndup (argv[optind], n); >>> -      if (keys[optind] == NULL) { >>> -        perror ("strndup"); >>> +      CLEANUP_FREE char *key = strndup (argv[optind], n); >>> +      const char *safekey = nbdkit_string_intern (key); >>> +      if (safekey == NULL) >>>

On Jun 21, 2011, at 10:39 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > The register allocators will check interference using atoms instead of aliases. That will be faster since every register has fewer atoms than aliases. It also scales well when adding support for register sequence constraints since new super-registers don't add any atoms. > > In the greedy and basic allocators, it means that

On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > In the past, I've seen some pushback on the list against adding more register classes. You can see it in the code as well, TargetLowering::getRegClassForInlineAsmConstraint() returns a vector of registers instead of a real register class. > > What is the reason we don't like adding register classes? Is it still a valid

hi, I've written a start of an c32-module to do basic substition: add subst.c32 this is a start of a generic substition module --- commit 9a1f41a7e6599fe6a162197cd9ddc6610185e780 tree cfb799a0be9844926afe44e21b2eb96630666c44 parent 89478bdbfa7167bc1b627a478d042c99e46f06b7 author Maurice Massar <massar at unix-ag.uni-kl.de> Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:13:39 +0200 committer Maurice Massar

In the past, I've seen some pushback on the list against adding more register classes. You can see it in the code as well, TargetLowering::getRegClassForInlineAsmConstraint() returns a vector of registers instead of a real register class. What is the reason we don't like adding register classes? Is it still a valid reason? The new register allocators, fast and greedy, don't care at

The following three functions are designed to make manipulation of dataframes easier. I won't write detailed docs just now, but if you follow the example below, you should get the general picture. Comments are welcome, esp. re. naming conventions. Note that these functions are definitely not portable to S because they rely on R's scoping rules. Not that difficult to fix, though: The nm

On Jun 22, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: > On Jun 21, 2011, at 10:39 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: >> The register allocators will check interference using atoms instead of aliases. That will be faster since every register has fewer atoms than aliases. It also scales well when adding support for register sequence constraints since new super-registers don't add any atoms.

On Jun 21, 2011, at 10:20 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > >> >> On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: >> >>> In the past, I've seen some pushback on the list against adding more register classes. You can see it in the code as well,

On Jun 21, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: > We should make it clear that the performance problem is with register aliases, not classes. Yes, those are orthogonal issues. > Register aliasing is a serious problem with the current implementation. The postRA scheduler is *cubic* in the size of the alias list. You dramatically improved compile time with this simple fix: > >

On Jun 21, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > >> In the past, I've seen some pushback on the list against adding more register classes. You can see it in the code as well, TargetLowering::getRegClassForInlineAsmConstraint() returns a vector of registers instead of a real register class. >> >> What

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!-- #msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding:

It has been observed that binaries contents are depending on the order of linked objects. This order is caused by GNU make's wildcard function and the position of sources on filesystem. This change tries to prevent this kind of randomness. Also consider building using -j1 flag to make it even more reproductible. Change-Id: Ie8eee7f336e6f1fa2863c4150d967afd15519f1d Bug:

Would this work? The problem is, I do not have roaming profiles in use(As it is not practical for us, as users tend to use the same computers). I want only users with IP from 192.168.1.x to load the databases. The loaddatabases.cmd file in question would contain rem Grab IP address and dump to a file ipconfig >"%userprofile%\ipconfig.txt" echo Checking for your location