similar to: arkeia

Hello, i posted a question about a possible ext3fs bug a few month ago. I see this kernel-msg in the messages: Oct 8 18:30:00 o5s kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,10)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 Oct 8 18:35:00 o5s kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,10)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 Oct 8 18:40:00 o5s kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,10)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28 they repead

Hi, I looked though documentation and also checked last 9 months of archives, but could not find the corresponding information. We are having an issue with incremental backup with arkeia. Arkeia checks if ctime/mtime of the file are changed, if so, it backs up. I realized that when I ran rsync from a cammnd line, it changed ctime, and preserved atime of the file in a destination as

It looks like I need to elaborate further to get a feedback. I checked the rsync source code and it is using utime() to restore atime file attribute. It is fine to change ctime for that transferred file in this case. What we are having problem is that when rsync gets kicked off and transfers one file to the destination, this action changes ctime of "all" files in the same

Hi, I'm looking for common practices for backing up user data to disk. My user data is all in /home. I'm also interested in what folks are doing for things backing up os and configs. Any pointers on setting up rsync, cpio, etc would be appreciated. Pointers to good how-to's especially welcome. Currently we're using Arkeia Network Backup (commercial product with which I am

>> If you're looking to share the tape drive so you ................ >You could probably do something clever with a magic >script in the Samba config, but it still wouldn't >work with native Windows backup utilities. (Are >there native Windows backup utilities that can >access a remote tape drive?) You could probably get >it to work with tar under Cygwin if

A non-root user is trying to change their password but cannot because of the message: BAD PASSWORD: it is based on a dictionary word They swear its not true. Anyways, I was just curious where (if anywhere) the config file lies for this functionality. Do you know? -mike

I need to downgrade a system from Centos x4.2 to v3.6 (x86) due to performance problems with Arkeia Network Backup and AIT-4 tape drives. The backup database is stored on a v4.2 created ext3 partition. When accessing this partition after the downgrade, Centos complains on boot that fsck.ext3: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) (/dev/sda5) *fsck: Get a newer version of e2fsck! [fail] If I

Hi. Samba 1.9.15p8 under IRIX 6.1 (yes I know, it's old stuff ...) The susers on Windows 9x/WindowsNT just put their strange file name or directory name (like /usr/people/mesure_?t? ) on the IRIX. However, from the IRIX side, it's impossible toaccess to such files/directory. What's more, my ARkeia backup client stalls on such a name and fouled up my backup database... NB: Oops: for

I am transferring some files from a RH7.0 machine to a RH7.2 machine as root with a cron job, using the following: rsync -avt /home homeserver::home rsync -avt /etc homeserver::etc Some of the files transfer OK, but I get: building file list ... done failed to set permissions on home : Operation not permitted home/brad/ home/ftp/bin/ home/ftp/etc/ home/ftp/pub/ home/rsyncuser/ failed to set

Peter Kjellstr?m wrote: > On Monday 23 January 2006 16:46, Plant, Dean wrote: >> I need to downgrade a system from Centos x4.2 to v3.6 (x86) due to >> performance problems with Arkeia Network Backup and AIT-4 tape >> drives. The backup database is stored on a v4.2 created ext3 >> partition. When accessing this partition after the downgrade, Centos >> complains on

We're going to replace an older Solaris7/Netbackup/TapeRobot server with a new Centos box using backup-to-disk-to-tape (probably using Arkeia). The specs are up in the air, but generally: - CentOS/RHEL friendly (3Ware SATA? SCSI?) - 2U/3U/4U-ish form factor - hotswap RAID5 - dual PS, hotswap a plus - USB2.0 port(s) (*) To give you an idea of where I'm starting to look, take a gander at

Sorry but things clear a bit now ;-) i ran out of inodes on the filesystem, which is used by the arkeia database. It would be nice if the kernel loggs this condition a bit more clearly ;-) So i guess this time this "bug" is not the same seen corrupting files a few month before. mfg -- Jens-Uwe Katolla katolla@otris.de otris software AG

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Jakub Kicinski <kubakici at wp.pl> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 21:33:01 -0800, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: >> >> 3 netdev model breaks this configuration starting with the creation >> >> and naming of the 2 devices to udev needing to be aware of master and >> >> slave virtio-net devices. >> > I don't

On Mar 17, 2011, at 7:29 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 17 March 2011 13:48, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: >> I think you are mistaken here. I maintain and support debug info for two front ends (llvm-gcc and clang). Go ahead and check svn archives for last one year and see how many times I had to update llvm-gcc FE. > > Hi Devang, > > First, I'm not

I just upgraded to kernel 2.4.14 and applied the ext3 patch ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414.gz. It appears (to me) that the patch breaks the loop block device module (loop.o). The problem is that the call to deactivate_page is unresolved. The routine used to be defined in swap.c. It looks like it no longer exists in 2.4.14. I'm not a kernel programmer so if I'm mistaken, sorry. I do get an

I am a total RoR virgin, and took my first steps this weekend into the Ruby world. A lot of sites I create need to be as SEO friendly as possible, particularly for google. Before I delve any further, can anyone tell me how friendly the dynamic URLs or if there is the usual rewrite mod for rugby? Thanks Mike -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On 04/02/15 00:51, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 04/01/2015 08:12 PM, Always Learning wrote: >> 1. What is the logically reason for this alleged "improvement" ? > > I never said it was an improvement. I just said that I didn't think it was > that big of a deal, and it boggles my mind that people are calling a change of > an ISO's file name 'unwise' and even

+++ Peter Zijlstra [14/07/17 18:10 +0200]: >On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 05:58:18PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: >> On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 17:50 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >> > Urgh, is for some mysterious reason the __bug_table section of modules >> > ending up in RO memory? >> > >> > I forever get lost in that link magic :/ >> >> +1

On 7/7/2013 21:25, Patrick Verner wrote: > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Shao Miller <sha0.miller at gmail.com > <mailto:sha0.miller at gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 7/6/2013 09:20, Patrick Verner wrote: > > Same CD. Any Linux distribution without the 5.X series boots on this > machine. We can use 4.06 and it boots just fine. It's not the >

On 7/7/2013 23:37, Patrick Verner wrote: > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Shao Miller <sha0.miller at gmail.com > <mailto:sha0.miller at gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 7/7/2013 21:25, Patrick Verner wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Shao Miller > <sha0.miller at gmail.com <mailto:sha0.miller at gmail.com> >