similar to: kernel oplocks

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "kernel oplocks"

2001 Apr 07
1
samba on NetBSD - some patches
Hi, We (NetBSD) just received a bug report that smbclient's mput command usees find(1) with a non-standard option "-maxdepth". This was replaced with a simple call to ls(1). As I don't know how many of the patches from out Packages Collection were sent to you in the past, I'm simply sending you all our patches - please include any you like in future samba releases! BTW,
2004 Aug 30
3
cannot access files after update samba 3.0.5 -> 3.0.6 (Redhat 6.2)
Redhat 6.2 kernel 2.2.14-12 Samba 3.0.6 compiled with ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba --localstatedir=/var/log/samba --with-lockdir=/var/lock/samba --with-privatedir=/etc/rc-abas.d --with-configdir=/etc/rc-abas.d --enable-debug I can list directories and write files on a samba share but cannot read files. This happens with Windows XP client or smbclient. After downgrading to 3.0.5 samba
2004 Sep 10
5
autoheader failing?
With these versions: ii autoconf 2.54-2 automatic configure script builder ii automake1.6 1.6.3-2 A tool for generating GNU Standards-complian I am unable to build the autoconfiscations. autoheader gives: autoheader2.50: error: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS not found in configure.in What versions are you using? (btw, I do think it would be a very good idea to start using
2003 Jul 18
4
rh8.0 and xp home
I have two networked pcs. pc 1- RH8.0 which came with Samba-backend 1.0.8 and Samba 2.2.5 pc 2- XP Home I am able to access the shared folders from pc2 on pc1. However from pc2 I can not even see the ressources of pc1. In My Network Places/Entire Network/Microsoft Windows Network/"My Workgroup" I can see "pc1" but when I click on it I get an error message: \\"pc1"
2015 Mar 04
2
adaptive bandwidth
Thanks Dragos, I assume I will be setting those parameters during initialization of encoder right? Question is, if connection gets too lossy, how will opus adapt to it? Can it automatically shift bitrate down to minimize impact? Mark from IRC suggests that the app has to be aware of the losses and change it on the fly. Has anybody on the list tried this? Kelvin Chua On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:53
2001 Oct 24
1
Borken dirname on Solaris 2.5.1
Discovered this post an upgrade to 2.9.9p2, Solaris 2.5.1 dirname is busted for paths like "/usr", returning "" rather than "/". Index: acconfig.h =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/upstream/openssh/acconfig.h,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.3 diff -u -r1.1.1.3 acconfig.h --- acconfig.h 2001/10/23 15:18:33 1.1.1.3 +++
2014 Dec 16
1
Estimating bitrate during a real-time voip call
Hi Dragos, The issue is that not all packet loss maybe congestion related. Often, reducing bitrate seems to have no impact on improving packet loss. Thanks, Manpreet. On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Dragos Oancea <droancea at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hi > > You can start a VOIP call with 50 kbps bitrate and reduce the bitrate if > there is packet loss. You know if
2005 Feb 24
1
[PATCH] Drop SETGROUPS_NOOP
Hi, the SETGROUPS_NOOP define is used only for Cygwin. But it's also combined with the HAVE_SETGROUPS test in bsd-misc.c. So, since setgroups() exists and is functional in Cygwin, this is actually a noop in the more general sense. The below patch drops that entirely. Corinna Index: acconfig.h =================================================================== RCS file:
2015 Feb 05
2
VOIP: FEC and NARROWBAND
Hello, Is FEC supposed to work in NARROWBAND mode ?(with maxaveragebitrate=12000; maxplaybackrate=8000 ) ?I am having some confusing results, it appears that FEC is enabled in the encoder, but the decoder cannot find any packet with FEC. I am also wondering if this piece of code is correct (webrtc): /* The following is to parse the LBRR flags. */? if (opus_packet_parse(payload,
2002 Jul 04
1
[PATCH]: Remove HAVE_CYGWIN in favor of NO_IPPORT_RESERVED_CONCEPT
Hi, I've sent that patch once already but it seems more or less forgotten in the tumultuous days of the latest vulnerability. It adds a new define NO_IPPORT_RESERVED_CONCEPT which can be defined on platforms not supporting the concept of "privileged" ports only accessible by privileged users but which allow everyone to use these ports. This patch removes some Cygwin dependencies
2002 Jun 24
1
remove --with-rsh
is this ok (complete, correct)? Index: INSTALL =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvs/openssh/INSTALL,v retrieving revision 1.53 diff -u -r1.53 INSTALL --- INSTALL 13 May 2002 05:22:21 -0000 1.53 +++ INSTALL 24 Jun 2002 00:50:20 -0000 @@ -105,11 +105,6 @@ There are a few other options to the configure script: ---with-rsh=PATH allows you to
2023 May 23
1
vhost stable branch
On Tue, 2023-05-23 at 04:18 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 07:16:58AM +0000, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am looking for the stable branch for vdpa fixes in the vhost tree [1]. > > There > > are 3 branches that seem identical: linux-next, test and vhost. linux-next > > seems > > to be -next branch. Which one would
2023 Aug 01
1
[PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Fix crash on shutdown for when no ndev exists
On Tue, 2023-08-01 at 11:59 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 5:08?PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 07:15:31AM +0000, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > > On Thu, 2023-07-27 at 12:28 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 04:02:16PM +0000, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > >
2002 Jun 25
2
Linux 2.2 + borken mmap() round 1
The following is just a simple 'if ANON|SHARE is broken, disable compression'. We don't have time for fancy stuff until we have time for long term testing. I have one friend of mine testing this. Can I get a few other people to test. This is against --current, but maybe work against 3.3p1. Unsure. BTW.. those on NeXT platform (if you have autoreconf) should also test this. this
2004 Jun 30
1
Patch for call queues?
I'm looking for the patch that enables suppotr for the following lines in queue.conf: announce-holdtime = yes queue-youarenext = "queue-youarenext" queue-thereare = "queue-thereare" queue-callswaiting = "queue-callswaiting" queue-holdtime = "queue-holdtime" queue-minutes = "queue-minutes" queue-thankyou = "queue-thankyou" It
2023 May 23
2
vhost stable branch
Hi, I am looking for the stable branch for vdpa fixes in the vhost tree [1]. There are 3 branches that seem identical: linux-next, test and vhost. linux-next seems to be -next branch. Which one would be the stable branch? [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git Thanks, Dragos
2023 Aug 01
1
[PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Fix crash on shutdown for when no ndev exists
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 5:08?PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 07:15:31AM +0000, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-07-27 at 12:28 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 04:02:16PM +0000, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2023-07-26 at 15:26 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >
2023 May 04
2
[PATCH] virtio-vdpa: Fix unchecked call to NULL set_vq_affinity
On 2023-05-04 a.m.9:50, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > The referenced patch calls set_vq_affinity without checking if the op is > valid. This patch adds the check. > > Fixes: 3dad56823b53 ("virtio-vdpa: Support interrupt affinity spreading mechanism") > Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman <gal at nvidia.com>
2023 May 04
2
[PATCH] virtio-vdpa: Fix unchecked call to NULL set_vq_affinity
The referenced patch calls set_vq_affinity without checking if the op is valid. This patch adds the check. Fixes: 3dad56823b53 ("virtio-vdpa: Support interrupt affinity spreading mechanism") Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman <gal at nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea at nvidia.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1
2023 Jul 31
1
[PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Fix crash on shutdown for when no ndev exists
On Thu, 2023-07-27 at 12:28 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 04:02:16PM +0000, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-07-26 at 15:26 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:07:38PM +0300, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > > > The ndev was accessed on shutdown without a check if it actually exists. > > > > This