similar to: map_domain_name_to_sid

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "map_domain_name_to_sid"

2001 Sep 26
3
Name mangling bug: was samba bug?
Hi James, this sounds familiar - I believe I looked at a wire trace, and windows is dropping the trailing dots BEFORE it sends the request over the wire. so samba never sees the name foo..., thus does not create it. Don -----Original Message----- From: James Nord [mailto:teilo@cdt.luth.se] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:34 AM To: James Nord Cc: samba@samba.org Subject: Name mangling bug:
2002 May 21
3
Controlling share create permissions
Is it possible to set default create permissions on certain directories within a share? ie. Create files in the share [something] /folder1/ as 744 but in /folder1/subfolder/ as 777. I thought of creating two shares and having the users manually go into the other share to save thier files, but confusion ensued. Thanks for any help! Ryan
1999 Nov 22
0
smbd does not run from inetd
Hello, I've a problem with Samba version 2.0.6, where smbd does not start from inetd. nmbd starts from inetd and "smbd -D" works fine as well. And I didn't have that problem with 2.0.4b. The following is an extraction of the smb.log, which shows an "read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Invalid argument" error. Regarding this problem, what is the difference
2005 Mar 04
0
Winbind Daemon dying
Samba 3.0.11 on SLES8 on z/VM The system will be running fine then every few days the Winbind daemon will stop. Below are the last lines of the log file. [2005/03/03 14:15:00, 0] sam/idmap_rid.c:rid_idmap_get_id_from_sid(475) rid_idmap_get_id_from_sid: no suitable range available for sid: S-1-5-32-545 [2005/03/03 14:15:00, 0] sam/idmap_rid.c:rid_idmap_get_id_from_sid(475)
2000 Aug 16
1
problem with starting a samba server
Hello Staff at Samba, I installed samba 2.0.7 on RedHat Linux 6.2 I tried the installation with the RedHat distribution, and the custom installation from source. The samba is successfully installed, but I can't seems to get smbd started. Everytime I try to do that, it quites right away. Following is the log for smbd. When I check the stauts of smbd and nmbd in SWAT, smbd is stopped and
2006 Jul 02
1
string_to_sid: Sid S-0-0 is not in a valid format.
I'm continuously getting this message - it fills all of my logs... How can I fix this, or stop winbind from logging to syslog? Thanks! Nolan Jul 1 21:10:09 mgprisvr winbindd[2395]: [2006/07/01 21:10:09, 0] lib/util_sid.c:string_to_sid(285) Jul 1 21:10:09 mgprisvr winbindd[2395]: string_to_sid: Sid S-0-0 is not in a valid format. Jul 1 21:10:10 mgprisvr winbindd[2395]: [2006/07/01
2006 Jul 07
2
winbind: string to sid error
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Looking at the winbind logs, I have found the following errors: Jul 7 08:00:01 desarrollo winbindd[1952]: [2006/07/07 08:00:01, 0] lib/util_sid.c:string_to_sid(285) Jul 7 08:00:01 desarrollo winbindd[1952]: [2006/07/07 08:00:01, 0] lib/util_sid.c:string_to_sid(285) Jul 7 08:00:01 desarrollo winbindd[1952]: string_to_sid: Sid S-0-0 is not in a
2006 Jul 06
0
Winbind Troubles... string_to_sid: Sid S-0-0 is not in a valid format.
Hello! I posted before, figured I'd try again and provide more information in the original post. I'm running samba-3.0.22-1.fc5, joined to a W2K3 domain. All features appear to work - I've been running it this way for a month. This message appears not to actually affect anything, and it occurs every 30 seconds or so. I'll be happy to post my configs, if necessary. This set
2009 Mar 16
0
Winbind log errors: string_to_sid...
I'm running Winbind 3.0.33 with FreeRadius for windows authentication. Has anyone found a solution to these error messages in the samba.log? [root@pr01 log]# tail samba.log [2009/03/12 09:28:33, 0] lib/util_sid.c:string_to_sid(242) string_to_sid: Sid S-0-0 is not in a valid format. [2009/03/12 09:33:33, 0] lib/util_sid.c:string_to_sid(242) string_to_sid: Sid S-0-0 is not in a valid
2006 Jul 17
1
3.0.23 and group behavior
Okay, first the admisssions: I'll admit that I haven't been following the development as closely as I probably should have. And I'll admit in this case I might not be using Samba in the most efficient way possible. Also, I'm not 100% sure if I'm encountering a bug or just a seriously stupid misconfiguration issue. And I'm still collecting data on exactly what happened.
2019 Sep 13
0
Is the smbldap-tools package no longer maintained?
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 03:39:44PM +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 13/09/2019 15:34, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > > Mandi! Rowland penny via samba > > In chel di` si favelave... > > > > > > https://github.com/fumiyas/smbldap-tools > > > Even that points to gna.org: > > Ok, but GNA is closed, now, and this has commits (seems
2007 Jan 25
1
domain/unix groups and valid users parameter
Hi, I want to switch from 'security = server' to 'security = ADS'. Kerberos is working and I can login to the server. With Samba 3.0.22 I was able to restrict access to shares with the 'valid users' directive. ve is local unix group. valid users = +ve And force the group ownership with the 'force group' directive. force group = +ve [foo] comment = foo
2017 May 17
0
per user procmail filtering and dovecot-lda
Quoting James Nord <teilo at teilo.net>: > Hi all, > > I recently migrated my system (postfix/Dovecot)from mbox to Maildir. > > Almost everything is working (phone and thunderbird show all my mail > and folders with mail) > > However I am stuck on my .procmailrc rules > > ? :0 w > ? * ^List-ID:.*jenkinsci-dev.googlegroups.com > ? | $DELIVER -m
2017 May 17
5
per user procmail filtering and dovecot-lda
Hi all, I recently migrated my system (postfix/Dovecot)from mbox to Maildir. Almost everything is working (phone and thunderbird show all my mail and folders with mail) However I am stuck on my .procmailrc rules # cat /etc/procmailrc SENDMAIL=/usr/sbin/sendmail SENDMAILFLAGS=-oi LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail.log ORGMAIL=${HOME}/Maildir/ DEFAULT=${ORGMAIL}
2010 Sep 29
4
Problem when "valid users" is used
Hi, When I use "valid users" in smb.conf to limit access on my share, I have this message with smbclient : [global] workgroup = MYDOM domain master = no local master = no security = user passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://x.x.x.x:389 ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=company,dc=com ldap suffix = dc=company,dc=com ldap user
2008 Feb 27
0
XP clients won't login to samba domain
Hi, I have a small network with several Windows XP clients and an Ubuntu server (7.10) running Samba (3.0.26) as a Domain Controller but can't get the clients to login to the domain. Here's my smb.conf: [global] name resolve order = wins lmhosts host bcast idmap gid = 10000-20000 passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n
2010 Jul 12
1
Using +<group> in "valid users" is not working
Hello to all, I have recently upgraded to SAMBA 3.4.2 on Solaris 10, and reconfigured it to use domain authentication (security = domain). We slapped guest authentication on most shares, with an explicit "valid users = ...." on a small number of sensitive shares. Due to the number of users we were looking at, we set up two UNIX groups "payroll" and "payoff" and
2006 Jan 17
2
Sid S-0-0 is not in a valid format
Hi all, I'm trying to get winbind going on a different PC to the one I've already got working, but I can't figure out why winbind won't work on this other PC. It mostly works (wbinfo works, net ads testjoin reports OK) but "getent passwd" doesn't return anything. The winbind log reports this: [2006/01/17 15:27:15, 1] nsswitch/winbindd.c:main(976) winbindd
2005 Nov 28
1
Winbind.log - invalid trustdom response?
I am recieving this error in the logs after upgrading the samba packages on a SuSE 9.3 box to Samba-3.0.21rc1. How can I resolve this? [2005/11/28 08:46:01, 0] lib/util_sid.c:string_to_sid(285) string_to_sid: Sid S-0-0 is not in a valid format. [2005/11/28 08:46:01, 0] nsswitch/winbindd_util.c:trustdom_recv(259) Got invalid trustdom response -- Jason Gerfen "Oh I have seen alot of
2006 Jan 26
1
Share Admin
I've got a share that I'm trying to get so I can set permissions through the normal windows way (right click on folder/file->properties->security). The share definition is: [test] comment = Test share on magellan path = /var/test browseable = yes writable = yes hide unreadable = yes admin users = @"Domain Admins" The server is a member server in