similar to: request_oplock_break message in log files

Users are trying to cennect to their home dirs ... the request_oplock_break is failing: [1999/10/21 10:50:39, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(521) gpnte109i (137.94.128.183) connect to service s22350 as user s22350 (uid=22350, gid=34) (pid 27704) [1999/10/21 10:50:54, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1136) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 25867

Hi, I am trying to mirror a server every night using rsync. I have to backup multiple directories and multiple individual files. I also want to use ssh as transport. The problem is that I cannot get ssh to work without asking password for each step. I tried the public key thing but it doesnt work. Can some one give instructions for a layman like me. Also I want to know how to pass argument to

Hey, i build my first Linux Server in Oktober 2001. Everything works fine. At the end of Februar 2002 i got a problem. Please see the logfile. [2002/02/25 09:02:15, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1563) domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain NENN [2002/02/25 09:02:47, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(997) request_oplock_break: no response

Hello, I've been running samba 2.0.7 for a couple years now on a DEC alpha with Tru64 4.0D. I't pertty much a default smb.conf as far as oplocks & that sort of stuff. Anyway, the other day some users started having troubles with saving ms-word files. The smbd processes have always been running as root. But now the users with the problem own their smbd process. And they get

Hi all, I increased the log level, and found something very interesting out. I know now what causes a sbmd to go into infinite hibernation on Solaris. I do not know why, it is probably something Solaris specific, I thought that a "dont descend" would have resolved my problem, but it has not. details at the end. Scenerio: solaris 2.5.1 running samba 2.0.0 (happens w/ several if not

I saw a little discussion about this a few weeks ago but nothing concrete. We're running samba-1.9.18p8 under Solaris 2.6x86. I am periodically getting the following in the logfiles, usually _many_ at a time: 1998/11/03 14:42:00 request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 5411 on port 40884 for dev = 1980040, inode = 33c4d When I look up the PID (in this case

skeet@Bridgewater.EDU wrote: > > > Basically what it looks like to me is that an smbd process is spawning a > child which goes defunct for some reason I have yet to determine and the > smbd process hangs out there waiting for the child. Of course the child is > never going to answer being defunct, so the parent smbd process sticks > around and keeps its oplocks. > That

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54910 Bug #: 54910 Summary: Problems with nouveau and Gforce 2MX Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau

We have our user set up with quotas on RedHat Linux server(5.1). It works under the normal linux enviroment. BUT when we use SAMBA to get the user's home directory mapped to drive letter on a WINNTmachine (4 with SP 3) it doesn't maintain the quota. After using all the allocted space user can still copy files to that drive which is mapped for user's home directory. Does anybody else

I'm running samba 2.0.7 on Solaris 2.6. We've have terrific success for well over a year with samba until about a week ago I started receiving reports that users could not open MS Office docs saved on a samba share. The samba logs are full of information about oplocks like this: [2001/03/07 10:14:04, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1204) request_oplock_break: no response

For some strange reason, a samba setup which was previously working has suddenly stopped working, and I can't figure out why. The symptoms is that attempts to write some files onto a samba filesystem take a long time, and then error out with the error message (in Windows dialog box): "Cannot create or replace <filename>: The specified network resource or device is no longer

Dear All, We are in the process of evaluating Samba to provide SMB access to unix file storage for a few hundred PC's. One of our tests is to save a Word97 document - something that has caused various PCNFS clients problems in the past. While saving the document the client stopped and said something like connection lost, or seesion closed, and the drives mapped from the samba box

I hope someone can enlighten me on this. Situation: NT network, Samba PDC, about 20 NT 4.0 workstations. log(s).smbd are created per machine for easier analysis (as log.smbd.<NetBios Name>). Not often, but often enough to be of concern, are errors in request_oplock_break that seem to indicate that another smbd process that should be listening for break requests on a UDP socket

Has anyone tried using Windows 2000 Professional with Samba? I'm checking it out now, and when I try to connect to a share, I get an error message similiar to the one you get with Win98 and NT4 with SP3+ with encrypted passwords. Does anyone know the equivelant registry path to set plain text passwords? The NT4 path doesn't seem to exist:

Server is PII-350MHz/256 MB RAM, hardware mirrored high speed SCSI disks. Installed is SuSE 8.2 with Samba 2.2.8a RPM, XFS filesystems and LPRng as printservices. Server acts as PDC and WINS server. Clients are W2K SP2 (a few with SP3). There are +/- 100 clients. We see a server that is 100% busy and we see during a long time a very high CPU load (60- 95%) related to one W2K client. When

I've seen a couple mentions of trouble w/ large files in the list archives, but nothing that seems to resolve this problem... When trying to move or copy largish files (~ >1MB) with WinN using Samba 1.9.18p10 on a Sparc Solaris 2.5 system, things hang for a while and then a dialog box pops up saying "Cannot copy {filename}: The session was cancelled. I've tried setting

We're using CentOS samba for about 20 workstations, mostly XP, some 2000 and two win98. Samba shares a data directory with Word, Excel and Access documents/db's. Also Exact for Dos is running from this share (executable and data). The users experience a long delay every morning opening the first Word document (Word 97, Word 2000). This could take 10 minutes or so. If they close

First... Hi. Im new in the list and I want to say Hello Second. Apologies because my english writing is too bad. I haven't problem to read. But the verbs and syntaxis when I write is too bad. I will try to read the list without write. I write now because I have a big problem. In this right moment Im downloading the entire archive lists and I will try to ask less. I have a samba server and the

Hello, last friday I switched my users from an old server running 2.2.12 to a new one running 3.0.10 (that I've been testing myself and with smbtorture). After a while I had to switch back to the old server because some users were having serious problems. This is one of the logs (the others are very similar): [2005/03/04 12:25:05, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725)

Hello, i am running Samba 2.2.3a on a Red Hat Linux 7.3 box with kernel 2.4.18-10. I am experiencing some problems on a particular samba share, which is accessed by 10 Windows 98SE clients working on a COBOL production packet by mapping with a G: letters this samba folder. Well, some times a day it happens that this packed blocks because some files on that samba folder remains locked; i