Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Linux File systems Performance Tunning"
2009 Oct 10
2
[R-SIG-Mac] rnorm.halton
Hi all,
I need to transform classic 32bit Fortran code to 64bit Fortran code,
see the discussion [R-SIG-Mac] rnorm.halton. But I'm clearly a
beginner in Fortran...
Does someone already do this for his package?
From here, http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?coll=linux&db=bks&fname=/SGI_Developer/Porting_Guide/ch03.html
, I identify the following changes
2012 Jan 11
1
R error in make check
Hi,
After building R 2.14.1 on a Linux system (SUSE Linux Enterprise Server
11 (x86_64) ), I ran "make check" but it halted with the foll error:
Testing examples for package ?base?
Error: testing 'base' failed
Execution halted
I looked in <build dir>/test/Examples/base-Ex.Rout.fail and found the foll:
*******EXCERPT *****
...
> ### ------- Pickyness Flags :
2011 Jul 28
1
[RFC net-next PATCH 3/4] ethtool: Add new set commands
On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
>
>> From: Anirban Chakraborty [mailto:anirban.chakraborty at qlogic.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 12:04 PM
>> To: Rose, Gregory V
>> Cc: David Miller; netdev; Ben Hutchings; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
>> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH 3/4] ethtool: Add new set commands
>>
>>
>> On Jul 28,
2011 Jul 28
1
[RFC net-next PATCH 3/4] ethtool: Add new set commands
On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
>
>> From: Anirban Chakraborty [mailto:anirban.chakraborty at qlogic.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 12:04 PM
>> To: Rose, Gregory V
>> Cc: David Miller; netdev; Ben Hutchings; Kirsher, Jeffrey T
>> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next PATCH 3/4] ethtool: Add new set commands
>>
>>
>> On Jul 28,
2010 Dec 16
1
predict.lm with new regressor names
Hi all,
Suppose:
y<-rnorm(100)
x1<-rnorm(100)
lm.yx<-lm(y~x1)
To predict from a new data source, one can use:
# works as expected
dum<-data.frame(x1=rnorm(200))
predict(lm.yx, newdata=dum)
Suppose lm.yx has been run and we have the lm object. And we have a
dataframe that has columns that don't correspond by name to the
original regressors. I very! naively assumed that doing
2002 Sep 16
1
Multicasting routing in SUSE
hi all,
This is my first message to the group.My name is Anirban Chakraborti and I am with new mexico state university.
I have recently built a router using suse linux.I need to turn on IGMP and PIM to allow it do multicasting.How to do that? Secondly I also want to control the rate of the datatransfer from the router''s ethernet interface to the ppp interface.
Thanks for the
2005 Jul 14
1
a comparison of ext3, jfs, and xfs on hardware raid
I'm setting up a new file server and I just can't seem to get the
expected performance from ext3. Unfortunately I'm stuck with ext3 due
to my use of Lustre. So I'm hoping you dear readers will send me some
tips for increasing ext3 performance.
The system is using an Areca hardware raid controller with 5 7200RPM
SATA disks. The RAID controller has 128MB of cache and the disks
2010 Jul 21
1
lm: order of dropped columns
Hi all,
If presented with a singular design matrix, lm drops columns to make the
design matrix non-singular. What algorithm is used to select which (and how
many) column(s) to drop? Particularly, given a factor, how does lm choose
levels of the factor to discard?
Thanks for the help.
Best,
Anirban
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2013 Sep 12
15
large packet support in netfront driver and guest network throughput
Hi All,
I am sure this has been answered somewhere in the list in the past, but I can''t find it. I was wondering if the linux guest netfront driver has GRO support in it. tcpdump shows packets coming in with 1500 bytes, although the eth0 in dom0 and the vif corresponding to the linux guest in dom0 is showing that they receive large packet:
In dom0:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
2009 Dec 24
6
benchmark results
I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a
few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few
generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs.
All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them.
Here are the results, no graphs - sorry:
http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/
Reiserfs
2009 Dec 24
6
benchmark results
I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a
few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few
generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs.
All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them.
Here are the results, no graphs - sorry:
http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/
Reiserfs
2016 Apr 11
2
Re: [Bug 1325687] network type="ethernet" not supported with LXC
Hi Team
I'm trying to launch LXC VM with libvirt 1.2.12 having commit
*22cff52a2b8e06c913b1f97767e5d3**90fb17fc3b *with below XML configuration..
<domain type="lxc">
<uuid>64c48da2-e318-4085-8b88-c980aab4de34</uuid>
<name>test</name>
<memory>524288</memory>
<vcpu>1</vcpu>
<os>
<type
2006 Mar 18
1
ext3 - max filesystem size
Hi all,
I am working with a pc cluster, running redhat el 4, on opteron cpus. we
have several bigger RAID systems locally attached to the fileservers;
now I would like to create a big striped filesystem with around 15TB.
ext3 unfortunatelly only supports filesystem size up to 8TB, do you have
an idea if / when this border will be increased ? I already found some
discussions on LKML about it ?
2007 Oct 24
1
Problem with file system
While I untar a large archive on xfs , ext3 (ver 1.3 and ver 1.4) file
systems , on ppc processor and kernel ver 2.6.21 , I get an error. Also
sometimes, on ext3 (1.3 and 1.4) the file system goes read-only while
untarring.
The same tar file when untarred on a i386 machine works properly.
ERROR:
--------------
tar: Skipping to next header
gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--crc error
tar:
2012 Jan 04
9
Stress test zfs
Hi all,
I''ve got a solaris 10 running 9/10 on a T3. It''s an oracle box with 128GB
memory RIght now oracle . I''ve been trying to load test the box with
bonnie++. I can seem to get 80 to 90 K writes, but can''t seem to get more
than a couple K for writes. Any suggestions? Or should I take this to a
bonnie++ mailing list? Any help is appreciated. I''m kinda
2016 Apr 11
2
Re: [Bug 1325687] network type="ethernet" not supported with LXC
Thanks Cole.
I need to use network type="ethernet" with LXC instead of Qemu.
I have reopened my bug.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/11/2016 09:24 AM, abhishek jain wrote:
> > Hi Team
> >
> > I'm trying to launch LXC VM with libvirt 1.2.12 having commit
> >
2004 Jan 17
2
a trojan is on your computer!
hi, I am from Norway and you'll don't believe me,
but a trojan horse in on your pc.
I've scanned the network-ports on the internet. (I know, that's illegal)
And I have found your pc. Your pc is open on the internet for everybody!
Because the smss.exe trojan is running on your system.
Check this, open the task manager and try to stop that!
You'll see, you can't stop this
2011 Nov 16
0
problem to tunning RandomForest, an unexpected result
Dear Researches,
I am using RF (in regression way) for analize several metrics extract from
image. I am tuning RF setting a loop using different range of mtry, tree
and nodesize using the lower value of MSE-OOB
mtry from 1 to 5
nodesize from1 to 10
tree from 1 to 500
using this paper as refery
Palmer, D. S., O'Boyle, N. M., Glen, R. C., & Mitchell, J. B. O. (2007).
Random Forest Models
2004 Oct 12
3
Performance Issues with GBit LAN
Hi.
I have 2 PC's connected with 1GBit NIC's. When I transfer a file from my File-Server(Redhat9.0, 256 SD-RAM, 300MHz PII, RTL8169 NIC, 2x Western Digital WD200JB RAID 0) to my Windows-PC(AMD Athlon XP 1800+, 1024 MB DDR-RAM, WINXP PRO, RTL8169 NIC, 2x Western Digital WD080JB RAID 0) with Samba, i get Speeds around 8-9MB/sec. I think this is too low for an GBit Network, so i tested the
2017 Mar 27
3
[Samba 4.5] Very slow LDAP Queries (almost unusable), performance tunning ?
On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 10:43 +0200, Gaetan SLONGO via samba wrote:
> Zarafa is not on the same server as Samba
>
> We only have 2 AD/DC Samba 4.5 (CentOS 7) and we put required indexes
> on LDAP .
>
> Arround 1000 mailboxes but not all are simultaneously in use (approx
> 1/3 in use).
> MTA is postfix (and is still connected to Samba AD, this one is not
> causing the