similar to: BUG IN SWAT !!

Hi all... Has anyone got SWAT administration working from other userid's other than root? I've got a rh6.2 box running Samba 2.0.7. I have myself (wkim) in the "domain admin users" and the "admin users". Both the smb.conf file and the swat binarary are owned by root:swat. I'm a part of group "swat". (I'm also a part of group "root" just to

At 15:58 00-04-17, you wrote: >Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 14:45:07 +0200 >From: werner maes <werner.maes@cc.kuleuven.ac.be> >To: samba@samba.org >Subject: SMBD-error: important?? >Message-ID: <38FB0753.B00F2E49@cc.kuleuven.ac.be> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Hello, > >When I

Hello, I would like to clone a Windows XP workstation that's part of a Samba domain using Norton Ghost. In Ghost you need to create an account in the domain to be able to add your domain to the list of supported domains by the Norton Ghost console. When I try to add such an account, I get this error message: Unable to add DOMAIN to the list of supported domains, The procedure number is

hello I tried to compile samba on Redhat AS5U5 but it fails with this message: Install: cannot stat `source3/bin/umount.cifs': No such file or directory. Any solution? kind regards werner maes

hello I've been reading the thread (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=113286376900001&r=1&w=2) and I have the same limitation with WINS in a PDC/BDC. That's why I have the following (experimental) setup: PDC ==> wins support = yes, passdb backend: master ldap BDC ==> wins support = yes, passdb backend: slave ldap I configured some of my XP clients to use both WINS servers

Hello, Im using Samba and LDAP together and if I use the scriptPath attribute for a user defined in LDAP, it seems that variable substitions no longer work like they did when you're using the global logon script parameter in smb.conf. example: scriptPath = scripts\%m.bat ==> %m.bat is NOT substituted to machinename.bat Because the "logon scripts" directive of smb.conf will

Hello, Can anyone give me arguments that could convince someone to choose for Samba for file and print sharing instead of setting up a NT-server? Performance ? Stability ? Benchmarks ? Tests that someone has done? Things like: "It's free" or "You don't need a powerful machine" are irrelevant to our administrators. I'm looking for answers on questions like:

hello when I try to compile samba-3.4.x on RHEL4 with the samba.spec in the packaging folder I always get this error: Compiling ../lib/talloc/talloc.c ../lib/talloc/talloc.c:50:21: replace.h: No such file or directory ../lib/talloc/talloc.c: In function `_talloc_realloc': ../lib/talloc/talloc.c:987: error: `bool' undeclared (first use in this function) ../lib/talloc/talloc.c:987: error:

hello Although https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6721 has status RESOLVED, I still get an error when trying to compile samba-3.4.2 on RHEL5. The following command failed: gcc -O2 -g -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -c ../lib/replace/getpass.c -o ../lib/replace/getpass.o make: *** [../lib/replace/snprintf.o] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make: ***

add to each share writeable = yes or read-only = no This Helps! Rauno -----Original Message----- From: werner maes [mailto:werner.maes@cc.kuleuven.ac.be] Sent: 11. mai 2004. a. 16:19 To: samba@samba.org Subject: [Samba] BUG: Vfs audit module & samba 3.0.4 ==> share unaccessible Hello Maybe there's a bug in samba-3.0.4. The following configuration does NO longer work. It did

Hello, I need an answer to the following problem: I have a Samba server with domain logons enabled and with encrypt passwords=no. So I don't use the smbpasswd file, only the Unix password files. When I try to logon with a Win95 client (client for Microsoft Networks, logging on to a domain), people with mixed-case passwords cannot logon to the Samba logon server. Those with a password in

hello I'm having the following problem: On a share I have a user with read-only access to word files. Another user has read-write access to these files. When the user with read-only access opens a word file and then the user with read-write access to these files opens the file, the read-write user has only read-only access. If the read-write user opens the word file first, then he has

This (see below) is what I found in the Samba Introduction Document. Can anyone tell me where I can find the Ziff-Davis benchmark tests? Thanks a lot, Werner Maes KULeuven "The Present Samba 2.0 was released in January 1999. One of the most significant and cool features of the 2.0 release was improved speed. Ziff-Davis Publishing used their Netbench software to benchmark Samba 2.0 on

this is my output when I try to compile samba-3.5.2 using the spec file provided in the samba packages: Linking bin/smbclient /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libreadline.so: undefined reference to `PC' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libreadline.so: undefined reference to `tgetflag' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libreadline.so: undefined

Hello, Concerning the upcoming 2.2.3 release of Samba with LDAP support. Question 1: Is it possible that you define multiple ldap servers in the option "ldap server ="? In the event that one LDAP server is down, the next LDAP server defined can take over. If not, no authentication is possible if the LDAP server is not available? Question 2: Is there any fallback possible to a

Hello, I tried to configure a share with samba-3.0.0RC1 but after specifying the share name and after I clicked "create", nothing happens. Only the header "share parameters" is shown. I've searched the list archives and a certain Chee Wai Yeung reported exactly the same problem with samba3.0.0beta1 on 09/06/2003 Will this bug be fixed before the final release? Werner

Hello, I have defined 20.000 users on a Samba-server. The samba-server takes care of domain logons. When several users try to authenticate at THE SAME time the server can't follow: only the first users can succesfully logon. When they don't logon simultaneously there's no problem. For example: 20 users log on at exactly the same time. This situation occurs in our pc-rooms when

Hello, When I open a text file on a Samba fileserver using LDAP for authentication, Samba always makes these LDAP calls (see below). The user has been authenticated so why does Samba still makes these LDAP connections? Any ideas? /var/log/ldap.log when opening a text file. ldap-hh slapd[22940]: conn=3922 op=19 SRCH base="o=kuleuven,c=be" scope=2 filter="(uid=m2000944)"

Hello, Is it possible to add some static entries to the WINS database? We would like to add a few (logon-)server entries to it, when wins starts up. Why? We have several Samba servers who act as logon server on different subnets for different domains. Each logon server also acts as a local WINS server. It doesn't seem possible, not even with the options 'remote announce' or

hello the passdb backend no longer accepts multiple backends in a chaining configuration since samba 3.0.23a . question: will the following confi still work? passdb backend = ldapsam://ldapserver1 ldapsam://ldapserver2 ? the idea is to use 2 ldap servers werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm