similar to: Problem executing file from a samba-share via DOS-client

Does SYSLINUX have any idea which DOS driveletter would be assigned to the disk it is booting from? At www.veder.com someone is trying to build a USB flash drive. However, FreeDOS does not seem to boot correctly from it (bootsector trouble maybe, or kernel itself is confusing drives), thus we're thinking of using Syslinux + Memdisk + bootimage, but somehow we want to be able to also access the

On Samba 3.0.24, on Solaris 10, I can set ACLs from the command line using setfacl and view them using getfacl. When I look at the security for the mounted share on Windows, I only see the owner, group and world permissions. I can modify those permissions, at least for world. What I can't do is add another user or group to the ACL. I get the error "Unable to save permission changes

Hi, Could you tell me if I'm wrong ? I've understood that Wine can run a dos EXE program under a linux/unix environment : I launch Wine with proper arguments and with the program name, and the magic happens... Thus, if my program does some file input/ouput, will it also work ? Will I be able to access the outputted file via my old bash ? In fact, I would like to call an EXE DOS program

MEMDISK included in the freshly released Syslinux v3.10 is unfortunately broken. v3.09 works properly. Scenario: Isolinux --> MEMDISK --> FDBOOT.IMG (FreeDOS 360KB diskette image). Then try to access drive B: , which normally is your first diskette drive with driveletter A:. However, in this case MEMDISK occupies A:, and real diskdrive becomes B: Bug: when accessing B:, you're asked

On 13/08/19 16:33, Adalbert Laz?r wrote: > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 10:47:34 +0200, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> wrote: >> On 09/08/19 18:00, Adalbert Laz?r wrote: >>> If the EPT violation was caused by an execute restriction imposed by the >>> introspection tool, gpa_available will point to the instruction pointer, >>> not the to the read/write

On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 08:41:04 +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 08:01:45PM +0200, Adalbert Laz?r wrote: > > Thanks for the patch, Adalbert! Please add a Signed-off-by tag so your > patch can be merged (see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > Chapter 11 for details on the Developer's Certificate of Origin). > >

On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 08:41:04 +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 08:01:45PM +0200, Adalbert Laz?r wrote: > > Thanks for the patch, Adalbert! Please add a Signed-off-by tag so your > patch can be merged (see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > Chapter 11 for details on the Developer's Certificate of Origin). > >

Feature Requests item #2811, was opened at 2005-11-10 15:17 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414&aid=2811&group_id=85 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: graham foster (fosterg2) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Add UNC support to file / dir Initial Comment: I''d like to see win32

On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 07:00:24PM +0300, Adalbert Laz?r wrote: > This patch might be obsolete thanks to single-stepping. sooo should it be skipped from this large patchset to easy review? > > Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git

On 09/08/19 18:00, Adalbert Laz?r wrote: > It should complete the commit fd34a9518173 ("kvm: x86: consult the page tracking from kvm_mmu_get_page() and __direct_map()") > > Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c

On 09/08/19 18:00, Adalbert Laz?r wrote: > If the EPT violation was caused by an execute restriction imposed by the > introspection tool, gpa_available will point to the instruction pointer, > not the to the read/write location that has to be used to emulate the > current instruction. > > This optimization should be disabled only when the VM is introspected, > not just

HALLO, HOW IT IS POSSIBLE TO ACCESS FROM A DOS-BOOTDISK (VER.7.0) RUNNING ON A WINDOWS95-MACHINE TO A SAMBA-SERVER (WITHOUT STARTING WINDOWS). IF WIN95 IS RUNNING THE CONNECTION WITH THE SAMBA- NETWORK SERVER IS OK. (MS-NETWARE CLIENT AND TCP/IP) WHICH PARTS OF DRIVER, MANAGER, CLIENTS, PROTOCOLS ARE TO INSTALL ON THE MACHINE AN ON THE BOOTDISK? THANKS, PETER Mail: p_w@aon.at

I have the following problem when I execute a DOS batch file on a Samba 3.0.0 Server on a Linux Fedora operating system: The Samba Server shares a directory with the following attributes: [disk_g] path = /disk_g writeable = yes valid users = winuser create mask = 0777 The workstation (a Windows 98 computer) has mapped disk_g with the G: drive

On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 08:01:45PM +0200, Adalbert Laz?r wrote: Thanks for the patch, Adalbert! Please add a Signed-off-by tag so your patch can be merged (see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst Chapter 11 for details on the Developer's Certificate of Origin). > static int virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt) > { > + const struct virtio_transport

On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 11:10:41AM +0200, Adalbert Laz?r wrote: > On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 08:41:04 +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 08:01:45PM +0200, Adalbert Laz?r wrote: > > The pkt argument is the received packet that we must reply to. > > The reply packet is allocated just before line 680 and must be free > >

Issue: unix fifo (named pipe) does not appear in share, attempts to read the pipe result in "Access Denied" >From an XP laptop, I can open and access my samba share normally. I can read all files and subdirectories in the share, but a fifo I need to read does not appear at all. I have made the fifo mode 777 (world readable, writeable, executeable) and tried other things like

From: Mircea C?rjaliu <mcirjaliu at bitdefender.com> This change is needed because the introspection tool can write-protect guest page tables or exec-protect heap/stack pages. Signed-off-by: Mircea C?rjaliu <mcirjaliu at bitdefender.com> Co-developed-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com> ---

Hello Experts, I have a severe Problem with my current samba installations. Here in my Home-Office networt I have a dual-CPU machine with Debian Sarge, hosting some samba 3.0 shares and as well being a host for 4 vmware-sessions (Vmware Workstation v4.52, with 3xServer2003 and 1xXPpro). As well I have a separate raid5-server with samba 3.0 in the exakt same configuration (of course all parameters

Feature Requests item #2811, was opened at 2005-11-10 08:17 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414&aid=2811&group_id=85 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: graham foster (fosterg2) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Add UNC support to file / dir Initial Comment: I''d like to see win32

Problems With wireless keyboard and form Dell and a Dell domensioen 5150 computer I have obtained a DVD UBCD on it and also a Linux distributions. By booting this DVD the main menu is displayed but the wireless usb board does not react. I made A working USB stick with a working UBCD (with working usb keyboard) with instuctions given in under mentioned forum about this matter. QUESTIONS: 1.