Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Share"
2000 Aug 31
0
Out of Office Response: samba digest, Vol 1 #18 - 10 msgs
William E. Dent will be away from Wednesday August 30, 2000 to Tuesday
September 5, 2000. Mail is being forwarded to wedent@home.com.
Original Message Text follows:
----------------------------------------------------------
Send samba mailing list submissions to
samba@lists.samba.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
2000 Mar 09
1
FW: : Re: Multiple smbd processes generated
Dear Dave,
Doesn't this only work if you're using samba as a domain
controller and the client says "net use h: /home"
I've not got it to redirect "//server1/username" to "//server2/username"
when the NIS map says "user server2:/path/&"
Though if it could be done I'd be VERY keen.
Tim
"David Collier-Brown"
2000 Jul 27
0
Samba Domains & Password authenication
Chris Hines wrote:
> I would like to use samba as an NT domain controller for NT 4 & Windows 9X
> and posibly windows 2000. I have configured samba 2.0.7 and samba NTG as
> domain controllers and they seem to work.
>
> We wish our users to use a single password accross UNIX & windows which
> are copied from a central NIS map managed by the University. Some time in
>
2000 Jan 14
0
I: Samba & cadds5
I've been suggested to get some logs and give a brief description of the
problem I'm encountering with Cadds5 / Samba 2.0.6 and offer them to you ,
via http or ftp , to try to find a solution
I 've collected the logs , can I send them with a description of the problem
Thanks
Stefano Colombo ( scolombo@cdmtc.it )
System / Network Engineer
CDM Tecnoconsulting SPA
v. M.L.King 38/2
2000 Jun 18
0
SUMMARY: Strange Samba/NT compatibility issue
Hello All,
Thanks to David Collier-Brown who pointed me to the oplocks setting,
what was needed was the following:-
oplocks = off
Regards,
Leo
-----Original Message-----
From: David Collier-Brown [mailto:David.Collier-Brown@canada.sun.com]
Sent: Thursday, 15 June 2000 22:54
To: Leo Kliger
Subject: re: Strange Samba/NT compatibility issue
You just got caught by cleint-side caching.
If you
2000 Jul 28
0
SAMBA digest 2608
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:25:44 -0400
> From: David Collier-Brown <David.Collier-Brown@canada.sun.com>
> To: Luc Lalonde <llalonde@gre.ulaval.ca>, samba@samba.org
> Subject: Re: conditional logon scripts
> Message-ID: <39802A48.CD84F4C6@canada.sun.com>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding:
2000 Mar 16
0
smb gives many collissions
David Collier-Brown wrote:
> I wonder if Daniel S. Riley hit the nail on the head...
> > For high-rate TCP transfers, back to back packets with interface cards
> > that are close to the minimum interpacket gap, you actually expect 50%
> > collisions from the TCP acks colliding with data packets. This limits
> > the transfer rate to about 700 - 800 KB/sec; with
2000 Aug 16
0
problems after upgrade to HP 11.X
[Redirected to samba@samba.org --dave]
Dawn Wilson-Oliver wrote:
> We have Samba 1.9X installed on an HP box and all was working fine
> until last week we upgraded to HP11.0..and now our win95 machine can
> no longer access the HP box..getting error messages stating that no
> authorized ..does anyone know of any issues with samba 1.9 and HP
> 11.x ..
Did anything change on the NT
2000 Feb 28
1
read_socket_data: recv failure
John Wilkes wrote:
> I can't get samba to work reliably. Win98 machines can map a network
> drive via Samba, but writing large files to the Linux box fails. I get
> error messages that all are some variation on this
...
> [2000/02/20 22:38:31, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(560)
> write_socket(6,39) wrote 39
> [2000/02/20 22:38:31, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(468)
2000 Mar 13
2
Samba vs Sun automounter
A moderately-frequently asked question is "why do automounted
directories in shares disappear?"
The old answers were:
1) they timed out and auto-un-mounted, and
2) you shouldn't re-export NFS-imported stuff anyway.
A new answer (0) was just suggested by a Sun techie: add
a "browse" option to the automounter map entry, to make
them appear even when they're not
2000 Aug 24
1
Errors encountered : " remote server is unavailable"
[Moved to samba@samba.org --dave]>
> I'm currently using samba2.04 on HPUX 10.20 with client connections
> from Win NT and Win 2000. Intermittently, the NT/Win2000 clients cannot
> resolve the server name. They encountered the error "remote server is
> unavailable". However, if the clients were to connect using the IP address
> of the server, the connection
2000 Aug 09
1
Samba and IIS question
Denny Lee wrote:
> I have a question with using Samba and IIS on NT Server 4.0.
Could you ask it on samba@samba.org, please?
samba-technical is about internal implementations issues...
Of course, having said that, the authentication
errrors look as if the web server didn't have
permission to read the files Samba provided.
Do the Unix permissions on the files
include read for
2000 Apr 25
2
OFF TOPIC: Inquiry from a reporter re reverse engineering
You wrote:
> I am writing a news article about the rulings in the cphack and DVD cases
> and how they could impact reverse engineering in the United States.
> It appears that new interpretations of fair use provisions in copyright law
> could force reverse engineering offshore.
[We can discuss this in detail in private email, which you
may quote freely, but here's an overview
2000 Jan 19
0
Samba slow to Win98
Ian Leonard wrote:
> >> If I use smbmount and copy a 180k file, it transfers in about 0 seconds
> >> (including unmounting).
> >>
> >> If I use smbclient and 'put' the file, it takes 14 seconds. I have heard
> >> of an MTU problem but can't see any configuration options.
Ian then experimented with the buffer-size option of
smbclient, and
2000 Feb 11
2
What happened to mailing list archives?
Andrej Borsenkow wrote:
> Current aside, the February2000 was last modified on February, 2nd. Last
> message there is http://us1.samba.org/listproc/samba/February2000/0042.html
> The same is true for samba-technical, samba-cvs (did not check others)
> Or is it a problem of my proxy?
I don't think so, I see the same thing.
Samba web-folks, could you check this out, please?
2000 Mar 01
0
Smb restart
Craig Weatherhead wrote:
| I'm just curious if there is a way to have samba be able to restart
| a transfer of a file from the point that it left off?
It's doable "below" Samba using the Samba VFS, by
passing the start-point as part of a filename and
having the VFS (which you'd have to write!) return
the rest of the file.
Say you were transferring
2000 Mar 09
0
why is samba so slow with many files in one directory?
Jeremy Allison wrote:>
> Nope, I don't think so. Look at the kernel mailing lists for comments
> comments about ext2fs performance with 10,000+ files - it sucks.
> The developers consider this a broken application decision (ie. storing
> that many files in a directory for an application, rightly
> or wrongly). Try doing a regular ls of a directory with that many files,
>
2000 Apr 20
0
Samba and Solaris 2.6 and ACL
Andrew Wilson wrote:
| For us the Solaris ACL is being honoured by Samba but can result in
less
| permissions granted on destination files and directories than the
ACL
| stipulates, eg.
| ACL on a parent directory "test" is as follows:-
| mask:rwx
| However a file or a sub-directory created beneath "test" will be
granted
| less permissions for user tuser than desired, eg.
2000 Apr 20
0
Solaris upgrade (Samba panic)
Jonathan wrote:
| have upgraded SAMBA 2.04 to 2.06 and server versions 2.6 to 2.7
Solaris.
| After reloading SAMBA I get an internal error in my logs and users
an not
| connect even though it shows up in the network. Below is the error
in the
| log
...
That's a failure in
---
BOOL attempt_netbios_session_request(struct cli_state *cli, char
*srchost, char *desthost, struct in_addr *pdest_ip) {
2000 May 24
0
Performance help
Oh, you already replied...
Also you're on Solaris, so it's easier: you can email me truss
and sar files.
So, if I understand you correctly, the upgrade to Solaris 7 and
2.0.5a cut performance down noticeably. This is unexpected, as
a colleague who does big benchmarks always checks out Samba against
the old 1.9.18 version to make sure there hasn't been a reduction,
and 2.0.7, at