similar to: [PATCH] `smbclient -M' ignores `-p port'

Patch against samba 3.0.0 client/client.c Mainly for -L parameter options 1.) Add a configurable connection delay. The default is too long. Add items to long_options of poptOption for help message, however I just put something "i.e. CONNSETUP" to the last parameter of long_options. It seems for use of documentation ???? 2.) Remark the code that require list_servers must using port

I posted this problem as a question to this list a while ago and got no reply. I submitted it as a bug, but found that "samba-bugs@samba.org", no longer accepts bug reports, even though the web page says to send them to that address. Wondering if the option had been intentionally discontinuted without updating the man page, I made a quick check of the source and found that the "-p

Hello all This patch tries to remove a few bugs from smbmount. It would be nice to get some testing+feedback on this from others using smbmount and possibly get these things fixed for the next release of samba. It does the following: * Change lib/debug.c to allow changing your mind on being interactive. A second call to setup_logging should now replace the effects of a previous call. (hmm,

Jonathan wrote: | have upgraded SAMBA 2.04 to 2.06 and server versions 2.6 to 2.7 Solaris. | After reloading SAMBA I get an internal error in my logs and users an not | connect even though it shows up in the network. Below is the error in the | log ... That's a failure in --- BOOL attempt_netbios_session_request(struct cli_state *cli, char *srchost, char *desthost, struct in_addr *pdest_ip) {

A friend of mine is running Samba (samba-2.0.3-8) on a couple RedHat Linux 6.0 machines. He is sharing files bilaterally at work with a WinNT machine and at home with a Win9x machine. In both places, he is getting a large number of SMB error messages. I'm not sure whether these are from the smbfs (smbmount) or from the Windoze machines accessing the Linux drives, though I suspect the

It appears that "smbclient -p <portnumber>" doesn't work as advertised in Samba 2.x? On both Linux 6.2 and Solaris 2.6, independent of firewalls and the like, it works with old Samba (e.g. 1.9.18p10) , but not with new Samba (e.g. 2.0.7). The new version seems to *IGNORE* the port specification and attempt to connect to port 139. Here's the result when I try to send a

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 07:28:10PM +0200, Dominique Ramaekers wrote: > Hi, > > I'm experimenting with the migration function of virsh. I'm doing the > migrate with following commands: > > virsh migrate --life --persistent --copy-storage-all --verbose > --abort-on-error domain qemu+ssh://root@destination/system virsh > migrate-setmaxdowntime domain 20000 > >

Passing the -t option to rsync seems to cause -v to show each directory that is considered, while -v without -t doesn't. Is this a known bug or intended feature? Or is there a way to defeat this? I'd like -v to show the files transmitted, but not the directories that were considered. This command: rsync -urzCv ./ desthost:/path ...shows only the files transferred. While this

Hello, I use rsync v3.0.7 with "--delete-during", but it appears to act more like "--delete-before". I've checked the docs and list archives, but I am still discovering some of the subtleties of rsync, and I can't see where I'm going wrong. There's an example of my issue below... can anybody set me straight? =-) o We archive a small number of large files,

I recently upgraded to 18p8 from 16p11 and found that smbclient now needed a -W in order to connect properly to our domain (which was not the name supplied with the -DWORKGROUP= from the make). Turns out that clientutil.c always uses the value specified by the WORKGROUP macro and never calls lp_workgroup() to get the value specified in the smb.conf file, unless WORKGROUP is "".

Hello everyone,   any ideas on why a newly installed domain member (w2k8 domain) might seem to work fine in every test (wbinfo -g, wbinfo -t, getent group, wbinfo -n username, getent passwd user, share-access.., ) but only enumeration of users with wbinfo -u and getent passwd fail? wbinfo -u just returns without any output and getent passwd just shows the default centos7 users.   Even with

Hi, Basically, I want to preserve some of directories on destination side conditionally and hence, I choose to use --filter option mentioned in rsync man pages. I noticed that --filter option works as expected when I don't have --relative option used but in below case it doesn't work. rsync -avz --relative --delete --filter='H /mydir2' --exclude='- /preserve' mydir1/.

> I have the following in my smb.conf for NT servers (3.51 and 4.0): > > security = server > password server = %m > > This works fine for 1.9.17p3 and earlier, but doesn't work with 1.9.17p4, > 1.9.17p5, or 1.9.18alpha14. > > Here is the error I'm getting: > > NetwkstaUserLogon gave error 59 > password server BUD failed NetWkstaUserLogon > >

Hi all, i'm trying to make a linux box join a windows domain by calling "NET JOIN" from php/perl. The join works perfecly when used from the command line. I made a perl script that runs the actual command, set-uid it to root and ran it from php. Then i got this error: [2004/12/16 14:33:24, 0] libsmb/clientgen.c:cli_initialise(251) libsmb based programs must *NOT* be setuid root.

Hi, I have a situation where I want to delete some of my excluded patterns but still want to preserve some other. For example consider below source and destination directory hierarchy. Source Dest ---------- --------- /foo/bar/ /foo/bar/ | -> baz | -> baz | -> xyz | -> xyz | ->

Hi, I was in under impression that rsync 3.0.5/3.0.6 creates all the missing directories in the path but I think I am wrong. Could any one tell me is it possible to create all missing dirs in path at destination side if not exists. Currently, I have been getting below errors. rsync -avz /tmp/mytest/rsync-test/dir-test/parent-dir/ desthost:/tmp/mytest/rsync-test/dir-test/parent-dir/ sending

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8829 Summary: rsync -uav --delete --dry-run prints delete file list in reverse order Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Hi all, I'm stuck with a little dilemma and I thought someone could give me a little advice. Is there a way to use rsync with an ssh certificate? what I have: ---------------- First of all I am forced to use the root account with ssh which I know is a big no, no, but sometimes it can't be helped. Second, I need to use a certificate without a password as root which is even worst than

> I have just upgraded to Samba 2.0.6 and can no longer connect to Samba > shares on my FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE machine. When I attempt to connect, the > smb.log contains the following information: > > [2000/01/04 17:54:42, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(566) > resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name > NTWEB2.AIS.MSU.EDU<0x20> > [2000/01/04

I've seen error messages about this since we installed 1.9.18p10 of samba, so I went looking in the code for the context. Here (from password.c) is the context: /* * Attempt a session setup with a totally incorrect password. * If this succeeds with the guest bit *NOT* set then the password * server is broken and is not correctly setting the guest bit. We