Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Bug in smbmount?"
1999 May 30
3
smbmount permissions
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
2001 Mar 07
2
smbmount - file permissions on RH7
Greetings in Christ our Saviour.
I am having an enormous amount of difficulties trying to do something that
should be quite easy. Obviously, I am missing something. I have read
everything I can find on this, and have tried everything I can think of and
more...
I am trying to mount a Win98 drive on my Redhat 7.0 box. The mounting is no
problem. However, when I log into my user account and try
1998 Aug 24
10
smbmount problem
Hello.
I hope that this is the proper place to ask this.
Here is my problem. I have several smbmounts under Red Hat Linux 5.1. They need to be accessed by
my apache web server. One of the mounts keeps getting disconnected, but this is not noticed by
Linux. So the Linux box thinks that the files under the smbmount are still accessable when they
aren't actually mounted. What would be the best
1999 Nov 17
3
file permissions and smbmount
I'm using Samba 2.0.6 on a Linux server.
When using smbmount or mount to mount a share from an NT server, how do I
set file permissions. An older smbmount allowed a -d and -f switch to set
the file permissions. The newest one does not support these. The man pages
for smbmount and smbmnt mention using syntax that does not work.
I finally have gotten the mount command to work, but now I
2001 Nov 16
2
smbmount and UNIX Permissions
Hi,
I have two Linux boxes and I want to be able to mount a share from one machine to another.
Even tho both are *nix m/c why are all files in the mounted directory marked with mode 777???
I dont want to use NFS, how can I get this to work?
thanksashwin
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \|/ ____ \|/
Home: 732-342-7323 @~/ ,. \~@
Lab: 732-445-6721
2002 Jun 10
3
smbwrapper or smbmount ?
Hi !
The O'Reilly "Using Samba" book, recommend not to include smbmount
support as it is for Linux only:
"This feature wasn't being maintained at the time the book was
written, so the Samba team made it an optional feature and provided
smbwrapper instead. The smbwrapper feature works on more Unix
platforms than smbmount, so you'll usually want to use
--with-smbwrapper
2002 Jun 11
1
smbmount and win2k permissions
> From there, you can use smbmount to mount SMB shares (from
> Windows systems or Samba servers) in your Linux filesystem.
smbmount works fine :
$ smbmount //DOMAIN_controler/sharedir /home/toto/smb -o
credentials=/home/win2k/DOMAIN/toto/.smbpw,uid='DOMAIN+toto',gid='DOMAIN+Domain
users',fmask=664,dmask=775
The user toto is a domain user authenticated from the Win2k server.
2006 Oct 09
1
smbmount: mount() syscall gone bad ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I have seen a weird problem in one of my clients. The reported that
when issuing a smbmount command (both client and server are CentOS 4.4),
it would take up to 30 second for the mount to complete.
To make a long history short, by using strace and the source, I noticed
smbmnt is first calling mount() using ascii options for *data. Then
that would
2004 Apr 21
2
help with smbmount and permissions
ok, on my windows machine, i see:
myname on 'computer01\home' (H:)
so i went to my linux box and did:
smbclient -L //computer01 -U myname
and i see Home listed as a sharename (why does windows show it as "home" but its really "Home" as reported by smbclient?).
well everything works fine if i mount it like this:
smbmount //computer01/Home /mnt/computer01/Home -o
2001 Apr 06
2
Samba-2.2.0alpha-3 and smbmount
Hi All,
When I use smbmount to attach a NT 4 Server's drive C:, I use
the following command:
smbmount //inet_server_1/C$ /mnt/server1 -o
username=xxxxxx,password=xxxxxx,fmask=700,dmask=700,nosuid,noexec
now, if I am su'd to root, and do a df -h I get:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 6.7G 2.5G 3.8G 39% /
//inet_server_1/C$ 7.8G 3.2G
1999 Mar 07
13
smbmount question
Hi,
I'm running Linux 2.2.2 w/ Samba 2.0.2, using the smbmount that comes with
Samba 2.0.2. I noticed that when I mount shares, smbmount sticks around,
almost like a daemon:
[root@jason /root]# smbmount //XXXX.gatech.edu/XXXX$ "XXXXXX" -U jkau
-c "mount /mnt/cnd" < /dev/null > /tmp/smbmount.out
[root@jason /root]# ps ax | grep smbmount
10678 ? S 0:00
2002 Jun 13
1
[mntent]: line x in /etc/fstab is bad
Hi !
I'm having trouble trying to mount a win2k share from my linux box
with the mount command.
My linux box is a RH 7.2 and samba version is 2.2.4.
It is part of the windows domain 'VALBONE' and the smb.conf option
"winbind use default domain" is set to yes.
So when the user slautier log into the machine, it does it without
specifying the domain name.
slautier is a member
2008 Feb 15
3
Wrong perms on new files/dirs using `mount -t cifs`
My original thread had the incorrect subject line. The original trouble / question remains open and unsolved.
Greetings-
I am working through coming up with a Linux client integration to Samba PDC's.
I mount several shares with this sort of syntax:
/bin/mount -t cifs -o credentials=/home/userid/.smbcredentials,uid=userid,gid=userid,dmask=0777,fmask=0666 //ldslnx01/data /mnt/ldslnx01/data/
2006 Mar 03
2
Fstab mounting error
Hi all,
I've googled on this but no luck so far.
I'm using FC4. This works flawlessly:
Mount -t smbfs //host/share /var/mount/hostname/sharename -o
username=username,password=password,domain=DOMAIN,fmask=0777,dmask=0777
However, it fails in fstab when I do:
//host/share /var/mount/hostname/sharename smbfs
username=username,password=password,domain=DOMAIN,fmask=0777,dmask=0777 0 0
2002 Jul 27
6
mode=777 does not work as fstab option
I need to mount a samba share as mode 777, so all users can
read/write/delete/create.
I have this as fstab entry
//host/public /mnt/home smbfs
auto,uid=user,umask=000,defaults,username=Perkins,password=
see, i've had to put uid=user just to get it owned by user user, so i could
edit files
i put mode=777, but it does nothing.
i want to let all users read/write/create/delete
2007 Mar 06
3
/etc/fstab and windows share problem
Hi,
I`ve got a problem with samba and /etc/fstab.
I have a second computer running Windows XP SP2 with Western Digital
MyBook USB2 external hard disk attached. The Disk is shared over windows
network with a label "My Book (J)".
I can manually mount this samba resource by typing "sudo mount -t smbfs
-o fmask=777,dmask=777,guest '//win/My Book (J)' /media/MyBook", but
2008 Feb 13
5
Wrong perms on new files/dirs using smbmount
Greetings-
I am working through coming up with a Linux client integration to Samba PDC's.
I mount several shares with this sort of syntax:
/bin/mount -t cifs -o credentials=/home/userid/.smbcredentials,uid=userid,gid=userid,dmask=0777,fmask=0666 //ldslnx01/data /mnt/ldslnx01/data/
However when I create new files/dirs on the Samba share from the Linux workstation, the perms are not 0666/0777
2002 Jul 17
1
w2k, adding printers and other questions.
RH 7.2, samba 2.2.5-1 installed via RPM. Using winbind. I'm trying to
see how much remote printer administration is possible from a w2k box,
and I'm having a few problems, several are probably related. HELP!
Few quick questions first, before the 2 big questions:
Not sure if it was necessary, but I put root = myNTlogin in smbusers
file. Is that completely wrong/pointless?
For the
2003 Sep 08
1
Problems deleting directories on smbmounted partitions
Hi,
I'm having some odd problems with samba in combination with fam. On my linux
system I have mounted some partitions that are shared by a Win2k machine on
my LAN. With any GUI filemanager using fam I can create files and
directories, but I can't delete directories, only files. If I try to delete a
directory, it just doesn't work. If I try to delete a directory containing
files,
2001 Dec 17
1
smbmount appears to subvert access permissions
Hi all,
(1) I wish to mount a SMB share onto my Linux filesystem. When I mount the share, it modifies the permissions on the "mounting directory" allowing other users to gain access to the share, masquerading as the mounting user. Lucky it doesn't give write access to anyone, but read access is bad enough.
Can anyone explain this behaviour? (Example transcript provided below)