similar to: Am I trying the wrong things?

For a set of systems that can almost talk to each other, I suspect I have some really crazed underlying configuration glitches. I'm trying to add some samba servers (to make disks on my linux servers visible to people on Windows boxes) to a small home network; currently there is a Windows 3.11 box, two Windows 98 boxes, and an NT Workstation (not server) box, in addition to the two Linux

Hello. I have a problem that I hope you can help me with. I have 95,98 and NT machines and a Linux box with samba 2.2.5 (or what ever is shipped with redhat) that shares a printer to the windows machines. The problem is now: -the NT machines finds the printer! -the 98 machine finds something, but rejects all passwords (it runs encryot. passwd) -the 95 does not find anything at all. (runs encrypt

First, it fails because the destination directory doesn''t exist. Then it fails because it DOES exist. I really expected one of those to work. So, what am I confused about now? (Running 2008.11) # zpool import -R /backups/bup-ruin bup-ruin # zfs send -R "zp1 at bup-20090222-054457UTC" | zfs receive -dv bup-ruin/fsfs/zp1" cannot receive: specified fs (bup-ruin/fsfs/zp1)

I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a new Dell R301 server. I wanted to run Xen and have the full virtualization possibilities (this is our development support server, so it runs a few real services and is available for playing with things; putting the "playing with things" functions into virtual servers would protect the "few real services", and make it easier to clean up

If I type "xm console 6", say (when I have a virtual machine 6 running), what should I get? The documentation seems to indicate that I should get something that behaves like a telnet to a serial console. What I actually get is a connection that might show me a couple of lines of output that do look like they belonged on the console, but doesn't seem to accept any input (except that

I was recently evaluating much the same question but with out only a single pool and sizing my disks equally. I only need about 500GB of usable space and so I was considering the value of 4x 250GB SATA Drives versus 5x 160GB SATA drives. I had intended to use an AMS 5 disk in 3 5.25" bay hot-swap backplane. http://www.american-media.com/product/backplane/sata300/sata300.html I priced

If I can log in to the guest through the console, I can of course find out what IP DHCP has assigned it. If I configure a static IP I can of course connect to the system there (if it runs services, the firewall allows it, all the usual caveats). Does there happen to be any way to determine from dom0 what IPs are participating in the network and which guests they belong to? (I'm configuring

I am using AD DC. I already have a domain Samba3 + Openladp, I'm creating this new domain Samba4, but I want to import all users who have already registered in my base Openldap. If it was the same demesne I would use the migration tool, but it's a different domain. -- View this message in context:

Hi Charles, I'll try the blazer_ser and the nutdrv_qx with version 2.7.1 later. Below, the result of 'lsusb -vvv' requested: Bus 004 Device 002: ID 04b4:5500 Cypress Semiconductor Corp. HID->COM RS232 Adapter Device Descriptor: bLength 18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 1.00 bDeviceClass 0 (Defined at Interface level)

I?ve spend a few hours reading through the forums and wiki and honestly my head is spinning. I have been trying to study up on either buying or building a box that would allow me to add drives of varying sizes/speeds/brands (adding more later etc) and still be able to use the full space of drives (minus parity? [not sure if I got the terminology right]) with redundancy. I have found the ?all in

Using Centos 5.2 with Xen. I'm making a group of nodes behind an LVS load-director to perform computing services. Those nodes are only accessible from the LVS nodes (I'm using LVS NAT mode). Actually it's Xen virtual servers on the physical nodes behind the LVS boxes that I'm mostly concerned with. When you create a guest with virt-install, there's a vnc param and a vncport

My full backup script errorred out the last two times I ran it. I''ve got a full Bash trace of it, so I know exactly what was done. There are a moderate number of snapshots on the zp1 pool, and I''m intending to replicate the whole thing into the backup pool. After housekeeping, I take make a current snapshot on the data pool (zp1). Since this is a new full backup, I then

I''ve lucked into some big disks, so I''m thinking of biting the bullet (screaming loudly in the process) and superceding the SATA controllers on my motherboard with something that will work with hot-swap in Solaris. (did I mention before I''m still pissed about this?) I have enough to populate all 8 bays (meaning adding 4 disks to what I have now), so the 6 ports on the

What about the Asus M2N-SLI Deluxe motherboard? It has 7 SATA ports, supports ECC memory, socket AM2, generally looks very attractive for my home storage server. Except that it, and the nvidia nForce 570-SLI it''s built on, don''t seem to be on the HCL. I''m hoping that''s just "yet", not reported yet. Anybody run Solaris on it? Or at least on any

I built a fileserver on solaris 10u6 (10/08) intending to back it up to another server via zfs send | ssh othermachine ''zfs receive'' However, the new server is too new for 10u6 (10/08) and requires a later version of solaris . presently available is 10u8 (10/09) Is it crazy for me to try the send/receive with these two different versions of OSes? Is it possible the

I know i''m probably doing something REALLY stupid.....but for some reason i can''t get send/recv to work over ssh. I just built a new media server and i''d like to move a few filesystem from my old server to my new server but for some reason i keep getting strange errors... At first i''d see something like this: pfexec: can''t get real path of

I've got small numbers of connections moving through a load balancer configured in NAT mode. So I've got an iptables table called "nat", which has in it a line "-A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE" (lan connect is eth0, private lan inside the cluster is eth1). The load balancer is working; connections made to the virtual ip on that host do get routed to one of the

Hi everyone. I''m a Xen newbie and I''m trying to get oriented here in the xeniverse. (Can I say that here?) My eventual goal is to set up multiple virtual xen servers in a minimum number of physical "boxes". My only knowledge of Xen so far is my careful reading of the famous paper "Xen - the Art of Virtualization". So I went to the web and searched Xen

I've got a Centos guest and a Windows 2003 server guest running in Xen under Centos (5.2 in both cases), and they can get out to the network, and I can ping them from dom0. This is my first Xen install, and I haven't used Linux as a router before (I'm very familiar with it as a webserver and development platform) so I'm a bit weak on the bridging code and NAT / IP masquerading.

please subscribe to the list: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev On Feb 19, 2014, at 7:52 AM, Thiago Tiedtke dos Reis wrote: > If I try to access the port /dev/ttyUSB0 using minicon (minicom -D /dev/ttyUSB0) or cat ( cat /dev/ttyUSB0 ), the access to device is denied. even as root? > Then, I try these instructions [0], but nothing changes when I try to