similar to: call_nt_transact_ioctl should be implemented

Hello, we run samba 2.0.6 on Solaris2.6 and use it together with clearcase (version 3.2.1). Sometimes the checkout of files from a clearcase NT-client hangs and probably causes clearcase to destroy the viewstore. In the samba logfile of that client I found the following message: [2000/02/17 09:29:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2401) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not

I'm hoping this turns into another case of 'knowing it works makes it happen.' I am involved with a unix clearcase installation which now needs to work with nt. We have clearcase 3.2.1 running on both the unix and nt side. Because we have checkin/checkout triggers hooked to some unix-side stuff, we need the unix views to be accessible from nt. Does anyone have direct experience

Is there anyone out there successfully using Rational Clearcase with SAMBA? Was there any special changes you had to make to get it to work? We were told by Rational specifically not to use SAMBA and wanted to get the other side. TIA Paul Gilles Navigation Technologies -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms-tnef

Hi William, I got no positive reply since I made my posting. Only you and another guy, who made the same experience. No answer to the question, what functionality has "call_nt_transact_ioctl" and what effect on SAMBA has the missing of this procedure. Sorry, Michael William Soudan schrieb: > Hi Michael, > > I'm getting the same message in our samba logfiles as you

Hi, We have a large (8 CPUs, 32GB RAM) x86 Sun server running x8664 Debian Lenny, with Samba 2:3.2.5-4lenny6. It's a BDC and file server. I have noticed various entries in the log files that I'd like to understand better. Some machines are generating this: [2009/11/16 15:10:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2019) call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x9005c): Currently not implemented.

All, Since upgrading to 3.0.23d on several linux servers, I'm seeing the following error repeatedly in my logs: Jan 2 15:05:49 boothost smbd[27935]: [2007/01/02 15:05:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2332) Jan 2 15:05:49 boothost smbd[27935]: call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x90078): Currently not implemented. Aside from the obvious, what does this error mean? I've googled for

Hopefully some one can help me wit this. I run ubuntu 8.04 server 64 bit edition as a local file and print server. I use samba to act as an NT server for 6 XP pro clients running MS Access database. In my log files I consitanty have the following error which seems to occur when there is more that one user accessing the database: Feb 27 11:36:24 fileserver smbd[11192]: [2010/02/27 11:36:24,

Hi All, I'm experiencing some really funky Samba errors, and I'm hoping that some of you might have some ideas. This only happens sporadically, and when it does, I loose Samba connectivity for a while. Here are my Samba logs: Jun 2 13:29:01 nasone smbd[20289]: [2004/06/02 13:29:01, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2076) Jun 2 13:29:01 nasone smbd[20289]:

I'm seeing these errors every couple minutes from my Samba server (3.0.28... RHEL5 build). [2008/09/15 11:59:44, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2463) call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x9005c): Currently not implemented. I realize what 'currently not implemented' means, and since no users have complained, I assume the message is ignorable. I was wondering however, if anyone can

Hi everybody I'm actually facing some strange messages in smb logs: our samba server is running fine but I can see a lot of this message in the log : Apr 27 13:33:53 lnx-ds01 smbd[18773]: [2009/04/27 13:33:53, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2029) Apr 27 13:33:53 lnx-ds01 smbd[18773]: call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x90060): Currently not implemented. after sometime (one hour, one

Hello David, After some experiments and discussions I came to the following result concerning private NT-Box connecting to a LAN via ipchains and using all NETBIOS services (incl. domain-logon): Cross-subnet browsing with NETBIOS could only be done by a local master browser in the private net. I first thought of using Samba on the Linux router for that. But the Samba service would have to use

(refers to posting "Samba 3.0 + ADS, winbind problem" from August, 28th) Setup: client: SuSE8.2 professional (kernel 2.4.20-4GB) with openldap2 2.1.12 and heimdal kerberos 0.4e from the SuSE CDs and Samba 3.0.0RC3 compiled from source with flags "--with-ads --with-pam --with-acl-support". server: Windows 2003 Server as Active Directory Controller (configured as pure

Hello, I just upgraded from 2.05a to 2.0.7 on a RH 6.0 system, upgraded one of the workstations to win2k pro, and didn't change anything to my smb.conf.

Can a router between two subnets (call it A and B) be the local master browser of the one subnet (net A) in a NT domain, when the Domain Master Browser (as well as PDC and BDC) are located in the other subnet (B)? Will say, does the Domain Master Browser of a NT domain accept a Local Master Browser in the same subnet (as the router is accessed from B via the interface ethB)? The reason for my

gid=500) (pid 30102) [2000/11/30 10:44:37, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2516) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. uname -a: Linux ***** 2.2.14-5.0smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 21:01:40 EST 2000 i686 unknown smbd -V: Version 2.0.7 nmbd -V: Version 2.0.7 rpm -a -q | grep samba: samba-common-2.0.7-4 samba-client-2.0.7-4 samba-2.0.7-4 ls -l samba*: -rw-rw-r-- 4312642 Oct 18 11:54

gid=500) (pid 30102) [2000/11/30 10:44:37, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2516) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. uname -a: Linux ***** 2.2.14-5.0smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 21:01:40 EST 2000 i686 unknown smbd -V: Version 2.0.7 nmbd -V: Version 2.0.7 rpm -a -q | grep samba: samba-common-2.0.7-4 samba-client-2.0.7-4 samba-2.0.7-4 ls -l samba*: -rw-rw-r-- 4312642 Oct 18 11:54

I'am using Samba 3.0rc1 on a SuSE 8.2 system (heimdal kerberos). I managed to join a Active Directory REALM, but I have difficulties with user authentification. Something may be wrong with my winbind setup: e.g. I cannot connect from a Windows 2003 Server to a samba share without being prompted for account and password. Furtheron wbinfo -u returns "error looking up domain users", but

Hi! We're using Samba as PDC, and recently had a strange crash on the system (none of the NT-machines authenticated anymore). I re-created the user database and passwords on the server (TurboLinux 2.2.14-5, with Samba 2.0.6 & 2.1alpha for auth.) and also re-newed the profiles making 'em local on the NT-workstations. Sometimes when the NT-PC gets rebooted, I can't authenticate it

This message I found in my smb log file : [2000/01/31 08:56:47, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2387) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. corresponding code in nttrans.c : /****************************************************************** ********** Reply to IOCTL - not implemented - no plans. *******************************************************************

I already wrote some lines about vmware with hostonly mode networking in SAMBA digest 2339 (as far as samba is concerned). Bernhard > > Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 23:43:15 -0500 > From: Dennis Boylan <dennis@lan.com> > To: samba@samba.org > Subject: VMware and host-only with Samba. > Message-ID: <19991218234315.A4332@smp.lan.com> > Mime-Version: 1.0 >