similar to: Rapid transfers cause kernel panic

Hi All, I am working on a port of Samba to the uClinux/ColdFire system. This is a port of Linux running on the Motorola ColdFire processors. These processors have no MMU, so no virtual memory. It also means that there is no true fork() call, only a vfork() type primitive is supported. Other than this the fact that there is no MMU is pretty transparent applications, it looks like any other Linux

Sorry, forgot to change the subject on my first posting. I was reading a comment this morning about something Microsoft had published to the effect that there were vendors guaranteeing 99.9% uptime for NT. The guy who wrote the reply did the math for what that means, and the results are very interesting. Quote below: OK, now what does a 99.9% uptime guarantee mean? Well, it means that at

Hi all. We have been denying NFS access to our Linux et al users since they can of course set their uid to whatever they want. So we tell them to use smbfs. But when I just tried experimenting by mounting my own network share on my Linux box via smbfs, and created a few files, I loo on the serevr and the files are all owned by root?! This has got to be a configuration issue right? -- Mark E

We're using Samba, and it's working very well, however I'm interested in finding out what approaches would work for having some sort of redundancies in place in case the main server crashes. Is there anything in place for Samba in order to have some sort of backup in place in case the main server crashes. The reason is that the server is critical to the company's business, and

With the current talk on bonding, I have a few questions of my own. I'm setting up a KVM host with CentOS 6.3 x86_64 on which I'd like to attach the VMs to a bonded interface. My target setup is one where two GigE NICs are bonded and then the KVM bridge interface is attached to the bonded interface. Initially I tried to use the balance-alb mode (mode6), but had little luck (receiving

OK. Different mailing lists are set up differently. This list is unusual because your answers only go to the person who replied to you. So if you want the other people on the listserv to see your answer, you should make sure that Speex-dev at xiph.org<mailto:Speex-dev at xiph.org> is added to the TO: field of your outgoing message. Hopefully someone else will also attempt to answer your

I am just starting with R and have the following problem: given a matrix of ones and zeroes, say mdim=4 m<-matrix(round(runif(mdim^mdim)),mdim,mdim) how to construct the matrix of those rows of m, whose elements sum to 2. Contrary to the random matrix above, the actual matrix always has at least one such row. Serguei Kaniovski

Hi, Just thought I'd share some test results of mine in case anyone is interested. Basically the tests are siumulating what our product does with files - although the tests do it a lot quicker (not as many files though). The test is to create 1 million files (each containing the text of the file number) spread over a number of directories. The files are then removed in the same manner as

I am observing the following behaviour with samba-2.2.12 (Yes, I know, it's old) and MS-Access XP on a Win2K box: The client opens a .mdb file and gets a level2 oplock. Then it opens the .mdb file again and loses the oplock (at least I assume it does: The server sends an SMBlockingX request to the client and waits for another SMBlockingX request from the client before sending the Reply to

Hi all, how can I divide two tables of the same dimension so that all names are preserved, ie do not become NA? I have "tab1" and "tab2", each having names in the first column. I want "tab3" with the same names and values "tab1/tab2". Thanks, Serguei

Hello, I would like to fill the rows of a Latex tabular environment with output from R, as in \begin{table} \caption{Table caption.} \label{tab:events} \begin{tabular}{c r r r r r} \hline <<echo=false,results=tex>>= fill.my.table.rows() @ \end{tabular} \end{table} Sweave produces the output inside \begin{Schunk} and \end{Schunk} commands, which latex doesn't

What is this??????????????????????????????????????? > -----Original Message----- > From: samba@samba.org [mailto:samba@samba.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 3:06 AM > To: Bernhard Bruscha > Subject: SAMBA digest 2259 > > > SAMBA Digest 2259 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include:

Hello, I just signed up to this mailing-list (note: my first mailing list at all), because I'm having some problems related to speex. Let me just introduce you to what I'm doing. I am writing a short (really short) paper about VoIP techniques, especially audio codecs for speech. I pointed out basic technologies behind audio codecs; vector quantization, lpc, long-term prediction and some

Hi all, starting from a vector "v[1:n]" I would like to compute the coefficients of the polynomial (1+x^v[1])*(1+x^v[2])*...*(1+x^v[n]). The following code works but is extremely slow for a large "n" due to, I believe, the polynomial being factorized. I wanted to try the package "polynom" command "unclass" but I could not figure out how to input a

Hi all, 1. How to construct a date from three variables year, month, and day, where all three are integers? 2. I have a dataframe by date and sector. I would like to add-up all entries for all variable with identical date and sector, replacing the original entries, i.e. emulate the STATA command "collapse (sum) var1 var2 var3, by(date sector)". Thank you, Serguei Kaniovski

Hi.. i have an expression of the form: model1<-nls(y~beta1*(x1+(k1*x2)+(k1*k1*x3)+(k2*x4)+(k2*k1*x5)+(k2*k2*x6)+(k3*x7)+(k3*k4*x8)+(k3*k2*x9)+(k3*k3*x10)+ (k4*x11)+(k4*k1*x12)+(k4*k2*x13)+(k4*k3*x14)+(k4*k4*x15)+(k5*x16)+(k5*k1*x17)+(k5*k2*x18)+(k5*k3*x19)+

Hi This patch fixes code generation bug - 586-class CPUs don't support the nopl instruction and some 686-class CPUs don't support it too. I created bug 17792 for that. BTW. I think you should also optimize padding on these CPUs - instead of a stream of 0x90 nops, you should generate variants of "lea (%esi), %esi" instruction like gcc. This patch disables generation of

Please include a testcase with the patch. gas uses " nopl 0x0(%eax)" for k6_2. Are you sure it is a gas bug? On 3 November 2013 13:50, Mikulas Patocka <mikulas at artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> wrote: > Hi > > This patch fixes code generation bug - 586-class CPUs don't support the > nopl instruction and some 686-class CPUs don't support it too. > > I

On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > Please include a testcase with the patch. I'm sending testcase here. Compile it with "clang -O2 -march=k6-2 -c loop.c" > gas uses " nopl 0x0(%eax)" for k6_2. Are you sure it is a gas bug? Yes, it is gas bug. I should report it to binutils maintainers. Mikulas > On 3 November 2013 13:50, Mikulas Patocka >

Hi, I am trying to assemble below instruction with latest LLVM code, but fail. Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug? $ echo "vaddps zmm7 {k6}, zmm2, zmm4, {rd-sae}"|./Release+Asserts/bin/llvm-mc -assemble -triple=x86_64 -mcpu=knl -show-encoding -x86-asm-syntax=intel .text <stdin>:1:31: error: unknown token in expression vaddps zmm7 {k6}, zmm2, zmm4, {rd-sae}