similar to: Win98 slowdown lockup problems (Resolved)

----- Forwarded message from Paulo da Silva <psdasilva@esoterica.pt> ----- From: Paulo da Silva <psdasilva@esoterica.pt> Subject: rsync: Request for a feature Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 17:09:11 +0100 To: mbp@samba.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040317 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=3.2 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=ham version=2.63 Hi. 1st.

Hello, I tried to activate SSL on LMTP service, to secure connections between Postfix and Dovecot on my LAN, but Dovecot is not negociating a TLS session with Postfix. If I enforce TLS for LMTP at Postfix's side, communication between Postfix and Dovecot is not working. I put ssl = yes ssl_cert = </dovecot/ssl/ssl-LMTP.pem ssl_key = </dovecot/ssl/ssl-LMTP.key in section protocol

After a several-month hiatus, I've returned to working on my main LLVM project. However, after checking out the latest LLVM head I'm encountering a new problem. When I attempt to load my custom plugin pass into opt, I'm getting this error message: dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: __ZN4llvm2cl3optIbLb0ENS0_6parserIbEEE4doneEv Referenced from:

Hi Talin, > After a several-month hiatus, I've returned to working on my main LLVM project. > However, after checking out the latest LLVM head I'm encountering a new problem. > When I attempt to load my custom plugin pass into opt, I'm getting this error > message: > > dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: >

This is issue never made it to this list, so i am posting it late, since I now have access to post to this list. -Chris FreeBSD Real-Quick(TM) NewsLetter. Things Happening in FreeBSD. Volume #2 Issue #2 February 1999 Release Information: FreeBSD 3.1 is available from Walnut Creek CDROM FreeBSD 4.0 is now the Development Version with no release scheduled. FreeBSD

On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 01:58:02AM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:07 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 02:55:31PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > > > Unrelated side topic: in your recent addition of eval.sh, you > > > wondered if we should promote it to a full-blown plugin rather than > >

On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 5:46 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 01:58:02AM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:07 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 02:55:31PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > > > > Unrelated side topic: in your recent

Hi there, We're currently attempting to explain a slowdown of an LVQ-type parallel analysis we're working on. We are benchmarking our analysis running over openMosix against the same running via SNOW for R. Both perform similarly on small datasets, but on large datasets SNOW drastically outperforms openMosix. However, these results are achieve running SNOW on the default RedHat

If you don't want to proxy the media through * the put this setting: canreinvite=yes this will allow the 2 end points to connect directly for the RTP bypassing you. otherwise I have noticed the same when I try to proxy I have to make sure everyone is using the same codec or it doesn't work well. .o-------------------------------------------------------o. Brian Fertig NOC/Network

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:56:46AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: > I hadn't noticed any interactive slowdown, but when I got around to > running the notmuch performance suite, there seems to be some noticable > slowdown with the glass backend (default in Xapian 1.3.5) compared to > chert (using xapian 1.2.22) Some of this is pretty much expected, though other parts I don't

On Jul 7, 2012, at 12:10 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > On 07/07/12 02:20, John McCall wrote: >> On Jul 6, 2012, at 3:48 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: >>> On Jul 5, 2012, at 1:33 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>>> Hi Bill, >>>> >>>>> Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? >>>> >>>>

> > kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#5 stuck for 67s! [khungtaskd] > kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7 stuck for 67s! [khugepaged] > > These messages started appearing today around 7 AM, which is when > users started reporting the slowdown. They are still occurring > periodically and the system is still slow. Are these messages caused > by the slowdown or are they the reason

Thanks for acting on this so quickly. Yes, the latest commit fixed the problem. I figured it would be a small patch but wasn't sure where to make the change. Thanks again, - DB > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jean-Marc Valin > Sent: 08/12/13 11:50 AM > To: D. B. > Subject: Re: [opus] Silence causing encoder slowdown on 32 bit architecture > > Indeed, the fix

Hello, after the update from Samba version 2.2.8a to samba-3.0.4 I have a big slowdown. The configuration at the moment is like this: samba1 --> Still running 2.2.8a on Solaris. Configured as a PDC. Workgroup A samba2 --> 3.0.4 on Solaris Workgroup A security = server; password server = samba1 samba3 --> 3.0.4 on Solaris Workgroup

On Jul 6, 2012, at 3:48 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Jul 5, 2012, at 1:33 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Hi Bill, >> >>> Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? >> >> I don't see any relevant LLVM changes, so I guess clang C++ compilation slowed >> down due to some clang changes. I'm not going to

Hi John, On 07/07/12 02:20, John McCall wrote: > On Jul 6, 2012, at 3:48 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: >> On Jul 5, 2012, at 1:33 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>> Hi Bill, >>> >>>> Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? >>> >>> I don't see any relevant LLVM changes, so I guess clang C++

First of all Hi everybody and thanks for this cool software called "wine" Well I've been looking for Help... I Know there is a lot about it... but I just wanted to know.... I have an AMD sempron 2500+ Gforce 6200 (256 MB), 1GB ram, with Ubuntu 8.10, Kde 4.1 (desktop effects disabled, no slowdowns in opengl aplications). Everything is ok, no sound problem.. no grafic problem. For

I'm getting very strange issue with rsync on one of my servers. I spent many days trying to figure it out myself, playing with options, settings etc but had no luck and now only thing is left for me to write to this mailing list. I'm using rsync to backup data from one server to another. And I see data is transferred extremely slowly. It seems to halt for a long period of time, after send

Hi, I''m running RoR on a debian woody virtual machine with 256mb of ram. Over time the ruby proces balloons to 90% of memory - and starts taking 5-10 seconds to respond to a request. I''m starting the server via: ruby script/server -e development -b 192.168.x.x Where should I be looking to get an idea of what''s causing this "memory leak"? I''d like

Is there something currently going on on the rspec trunk that causes a massive slowdown when running rake spec and autotest (without spec_server)? I updated to the latest trunk yesterday and the time needed to run the specs of my app jumped from ~20 seconds to more than a minute. The weird thing is that if I run the rake spec tasks separately (controllers, models, views, helpers), they