similar to: question SCO Unix with WindowNT 4.0

LS, I've create on the SCO unix the same loginname as on my winNT pc sharing a directory is no problem I have read and write access to it. The problem arise when I try to login from another winNT account let say yoyo then a pop-up windows appears. When I fill my origineel account with password I am refuse. Does someone know how to solve this? dump of my smb.conf file: [global]

Hi folks. I've set up several shares on our Unix host 'Geddon' which have all been working fine. The shares have all had the same valid user who I set-up using smbpasswd. I then set-up a second user (devsrc) in smbpasswd and made the new user the sole valid user of one of the shares (data1). Whenever I try to access this share the following Windows NT error occurs. I was wondering

I have several SCO UNIX system were I would like to install Samba. Some of these machines are running SCO 5.0.7 which comes with a Samba version 2.2, the other machines running SCO 5.0.6 do not have Samba. I would like to upgrade the Samba to V.3 on the newer machines and to be able to install it on the older systems, but I am unable to find out a download from Samba.org for SCO. Could some one

For those of you following the IBM vs SCO legal case, you have probably noticed that SCO has said that the GPL is invalid. IBM appears to make the reasonable case that you can't say something is void, and then rely on it. INAL, but why is SCO allowed to distribute Samba without agreeing to the GPL? That's like buying a car, then claiming the sale agreement is bogus but you still want

I think what I need is a prebuilt package. I currently use Samba 2.2.12 running on SCO OpenServer 5.0.6 but I am in the process of upgrading to 5.0.7. Can't move to SCO version 6 because our application isn't guaranteed to work on it. Regards Dave -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Mauricio Tavares

openssh-2.9.9p2/configure.in says: # Disabled until it works on SCO and HPUX #AC_SYS_LARGEFILE As an autoconf maintainer I'd like to fix this. Can you please explain what's broken on SCO and HPUX? I'm puzzled by the comment, as AC_SYS_LARGEFILE is a feature introduced in autoconf 2.50, whereas openssh-2.9.9p2/configure was built with autoconf 2.13. Anyway, some older GNU

Yo Andrew! What version of Openssh are you trying? RGDS GARY On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Andrew McGill wrote: > Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 15:26:53 +0200 > From: Andrew McGill <andrewm at datrix.co.za> > To: djm at ibs.com.au > Cc: gem at rellim.com > Subject: Openssh on SCO Openserver Release 5 > > Hi there > > Your e-mail address appears in the README for openssh,

Yo All! Sorry if this is obvious but I am new to openssh. I have used the original ssh for a while and am familiar with it (and it's restrictive license). I am trying to port openssh-1.2.1pre24 on to SCO UnixWare 7.1.0. I will post the small patches when it is really running. Two problems, SCO has no /dev/random so I installed egd-0.6. It usually works but sometimes dies. I have sent

Dears Sirs; I'm tryng to compile and install samba 3.0.14a on a SCO Openserver 5.0.6 server (i want to use some shared printers from MS server2003 on a customer network, but with samba SCO ver 2.2, i can't obtain the authorization from the domain controller to use shared resources), but i'm havig a lot of trouble. I had dowloaded samba-3.0.14a.tar.gz fro Samba.org. I had put all the

There was a patch merged in on 9/29 that changed remove() calls to unlink(): - (djm) Merged big SCO portability patch from Tim Rice <tim at multitalents.net> Does SCO's libc not include remove()? Note that sftp-server.c is currently using remove. The reason I ask is I'd like to keep the portable tree as close to openbsd as possible, and if we need remove() for SCO we should

Has anyone here installed samba on sco? I might have to install samba on a SCO 3.2 v 5.0.5 server and was wondering if there might be any complications, I'm used to freebsd so I'm not sure what I'm in for.

Hi, I've just installed a binary version of Samba 2.0.3 on SCO 5.0.5 and am having some problems. I'm basically following "SAMS Teach yourself Samba in 24 hrs" book. On a Win98 machine I can see the SCO machine in the Network Neighborhood. When I try to connect it asks for a passwd and says that the passwd is incorrect when I enter it. It also displays

Donald H. Bennett, Jr. wrote: >Here is a problem which I hope someone can help me out on. We have three >SCO Unix Systems in our office. Two are running samba but the third keeps >on giving me core dumps. Here is a breakout of each computer. [snip...] >Computers 1 and 2 run samba with no problems at all. However, Computer 3 >gives me a core dump when ever I run the SAMBA startup

SCO Unix 3.2v4.2 Samba 1.9.18p3 Problem with I_STR/SIOCGIFCONF I haven't a clue what is wrong here... We compiled samba 1.9.18p3 using GCC and everything is working pretty much okay. However, when we start the nmbd server we get an error message: > 03/22/1998 10:19:15 netbios nameserver version 1.9.18p3 started > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1994-1997 > doing parameter log level = 3

If you upgrade to sco 5.0.7, you get samba 3.0.20 5.0.6 had samba 3.0.14. so im wondering why your using samba 2.2.. samba 3.0x. is on the supplimental discs. Gr. Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: dave at anchor-tech.co.uk >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens David Nolan >Verzonden: vrijdag 22 mei 2015 14:12 >Aan: 'Mauricio Tavares' >CC:

Basically I've found that the 2.0.3 version of Samba is not supporting shadowed password files on SCO Unix 3.2v4.2. It appears to be doing it on SCO Unix OSR5 however. This shows up both in smbd and swat. We found this out by playing with the newest version on a SCO Unix OSR5 box. I recompiled the software on that box for a SCO 3.2v4.2 box but was unable to get the resulting binary to work

I'm considering commiting something like this. -------------------------------- --- configure.ac.old 2005-02-24 19:47:25.361190001 -0800 +++ configure.ac 2005-02-25 12:33:35.341390018 -0800 @@ -374,23 +374,7 @@ ;; # SCO UNIX and OEM versions of SCO UNIX *-*-sco3.2v4*) - CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -Dftruncate=chsize" [snip next 16 deleted lines] + AC_MSG_ERROR("This Platform

I apologize if this has been addressed before; recently I read an article in Forbes which discussed how SCO was going after companies that have been using Linux. The article made the point that the ideas behind GPL are under attack precisely because no one is making sure that the code being put into the freely avail. packages isn't owned by someone else. Here's my question: Is R

Hello, I used the sshd under SCO 5, and always get the error that the deamon couldn't allcoate a pseudo tty. This depends on that SCO use a different method to create the tty's in the /dev directory. The pseudo tty line looks like: /dev/ttypXXX where XXX depends on the number of pseudo tty's entered in the scoadmin Tool for the network interface. So I change the allocation routine in

I have problems installing the latest release of Samba on Caldera (SCO) Openserver 5.0.6 I have downloaded the source and ran "./configure" fine. I get an error " line 664: Syntax error " when I run "make". If I run " ./configure --with-winbind", then run "make", I get the error "Compiling smbd/server.c include/includes.h, line 885:error: