similar to: samba-2.0.7pre2 and file timestamps

Hello all, we are experiencing problems with samba 2.0.6 and the MKS touch command. during our builds, we touch files and directories so that our make dependencies work correctly. Unfortunately, it seems that MKS' touch.exe doesn't actually change the time stamp of a file or directory. The command returns without an error, but the timestamp does not change. The same problem exists

A rather distressing timestamp issue (to multiple users here). Anyone seen similar behavior or have a suggestion/solution? Problem: Opening and closing an excel file (no changes/keystrokes to file) on the Samba server causes the file to be saved with time stamp of closing. (There is no autosave set on Excel - also see other info below) MS Excel 97 SR-2 NT 4.0 SP5 Solaris 2.6 or 2.7 (2

> I'm running samba 2.X on Solaris (2.6, 2.5.1), and SunOS 4.X (but don't > tell anyone about that last one). > > I had been running samba 2.0.3, and one of my users noticed that when he > copied a file, using an NT 4.0 workstation, copying a file from an NT > fileserver (NTFS) to a Samba filesystem, that the dates were wrong on > the copied file. In particular, any

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11521 Bug ID: 11521 Summary: rsync does not use high-resolution timestamps to determine file differences Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

I' m running samba2.03 on Linux kernel 2.0x. Last time I recognized that some folder and files seemed to be dated with a wrong timestamp. I point it out for a folder called pictures The listing with ftp with Windows MS Internet Explorer 5.0: 13 14:28 picture File Folder 01.01.80 12:00 An the other side (Linux): drwxrwx--- 13 owner public 1024 Dez 13 14:28 pictures/ I've read a lot

I' m running samba2.03 on Linux kernel 2.0x. Last time I recognized that some folder and files seemed to be dated with a wrong timestamp. I point it out for a folder called pictures The listing with ftp with Windows MS Internet Explorer 5.0: 13 14:28 picture File Folder 01.01.80 12:00 An the other side (Linux): drwxrwx--- 13 owner public 1024 Dez 13 14:28 pictures/ I've read a lot

I see strange errors when samba client tries to shrink file to 0 bytes. Samba runs on Ubuntu 12.04, client also Ubuntu. Samba sits on top of POSIX file system (FUSE implementation). I can see truncate is called correctly and no error is returned from my implementation. Any ideas? [2014/02/04 12:34:49.806813, 3] smbd/process.c:1467(switch_message) switch message SMBtrans2 (pid 28426) conn

I ran a function called BoxCox, taken from the book by Venables and Ripley, for checking the need for power transformation. This function works fine using the version 0.50 of R, but gives an error message with version 0.60. The lm function in version 0.60 is different from that in version 0.50. Is there a bug in the new lm function? Kung-Sik Chan >

hello, all. i am trying something new and am stuck. i typically go with whatever colors the pie function pops out, but i would like to customize it. please find below a sample dataset. ##TVs per household. TVs <- factor(c(rep("0", 1), rep("1", 16), rep("2", 14), rep("3", 12), rep("4", 3), rep("5", 2), rep("6", 2)))

-------- --Multipart_Thu_Apr__8_13:33:51_1999-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Hello guys, I always wondered why smbclient keeps timestamp in `put'ting a file but does not keep it in `get'ting a file. Alternative to keep the time stamp in `get'ting file is to use -Tc option or smbtar script, but they are a bit hairy for interactive use, and it can only dump files with an

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1764 Summary: dry-run does not show changes in owner / group, permission, or timestamp Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Hi. Here's a patch for copying the atimes of files when -t/--times is given. I bumped the protocol to 29 since it sends more data over the wire. It obviously does not send the atime if it's sending data to an older rsync version. It passes all the tests (including the added atime.test) for me on a: Linux Debian/3.0 gcc 2.95.4 (debian), glibc 2.2.5 system. Any questions/feedback? I

Hi friends, I get different values for McNemar's test in R and SPSS. Which one should i rely on when the p values differ. I came across this problem when i started learning R and seriously give up on SPSS or any other proprietary software. Thank u in advance Output in SPSS follows *Crosstab* hsc Total ABN NE ABN tvs ABN Count 40 3 43 Row % 93.0% 7.0%

I posted a patch a few days ago that adds copying of atime. At that time, it was just enabled with -t/--times. After some time, we have figured out that that choice might not have been the best. Here's a new version of the patch (relative to CVS) that adds -A/--copy-atime instead. It also includes a test case. Any feedback on this patch and/or the previous one that I posted?

In the past there have been discussions about adding a switch to rsync to preserve the atime on files being copied by rsync. I needed this function for a project I'm working on and decided to invent it. I've attached the diffs. Note that this has the limitations describe in previous emails, namely that preserving atime causes ctime to not be preserved. *** Patch follows *** ***

Dear Martin Pool. We regularly use rsync for making backups of our file systems but we have noticed that the atimes are not transferred with the files and are also always updated on the sender's side. Therefore, we have created a modified version of rsync based on rsync-2.6.6 protocol version 29 which transfers the access times with the transferred files and also allows to preserve the access

We use LDAP backend and Linux 2.6. It happens only --with-acl-support. This 2 errors I found in the level 10 log when I try to copy a fresh copied file a second time on itself (permissions of test file are -r-xrw----, user and group match) Maybe the attribute mapping goes another path with acl support? 3.0.7 works fine. Daniel [2004/11/09 17:02:02, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(1038)

Hi all, I just released Samba 2.0.7pre2, available from : ftp://samba.org/pub/samba/alpha/samba-2.0.7pre2.tar.gz This is the second snapshot of the code that should become the official Samba 2.0.7 and is feature complete (ie. I'm only going to accept bug fixes, not more features). This is *not* production code, but should work well as a file and print server, and contains fixes for all

At 16:58 23/07/99 +1000, you wrote: > SAMBA Digest 2177 > >For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ >Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) rookie needs help > by "Page, Jon T" <Jon.Page@pnl.gov> > 2) genrand.c > by Mark_Noel@cch.com > 3) Wincenter 3.1.13/Winframe 1.7 - ACLs: > by Hanns-Peter Ermert

Hello, I am mirroring the debian tree using rsync. I realised following bug. Version: 2.5.5-0.2 on Debian GNU/Linux. Rsync did not correct old symlinks. # ls -l debian-non-US/dists/ total 60 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Apr 17 2001 Debian2.2r7/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 28 2001 Debian3.0r0/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 10 02:30