similar to: Change Request: New Environmental Variable for Username

Dear list, I'm relatively new to using ssh. I'm trying to use the -R option to set up a forwarded port between two machines. Specifically I'd like to be able to ssh to machineB from machineA and then have a port on machineB that I can connect to machineA with. If my understanding is correct I'd need a command like: machineA> ssh -R 10000:machineA:23 machineB This should

I'm probably doing something I'm not supposed to even try, but I'm trying for "proof of concept" before physically setting up a distant network because of logistical issues. Anyway, I have tincd running as a service on two windows machines on the same lan. I'm trying to establish a connection between those two computers on the vpn ip's (10.20.30.1 and 10.20.40.1).

I had a quick look for an answer to what I'd presume is a common Q but failed so wondering if somebody here would point me in the right direction, please & thanks?! I wish to use rsync to backup users' home dirs from machineA (Debian) to machineB (Fedora). I have a script, say backup.sh, in my own home dir and linked to from /etc/cron.daily and have set up the ssh keys so

I'm using the very latest 'version 3.0.1pre3 protocol version 30', on both ends, and have seen a date/time discrepancy in the log on the receiver. The sending machine (machineA) is in US CDT while the receiver is in US PDT. Both sender and receiver have their time set correctly. a contiguous snippet from the log on the receiver : (note the first three timestamps are correct:)

I am not sure where to begin so I will be as verbose as I can to explain the problem. I have 3 servers. Their specs are: Machine A: Redhat 7.1 kernel 2.4.9-34 openssh 3.1p1-5 Machine B: Redhat 7.3 kernel 2.4.9-31 openssh 3.1p1-5 Machine C: Debian Woody kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4 openssh 3.4p1 rsync 2.5.6 I am running an rsync over ssh from Machine C to Machine B with the following: rsync --verbose

Hi, I have a smb pdc running which works quite well so far, and would like to know if this feature is possible. I have two locations, and I want all users to authenticate on Machine A. Howver there are some users that are closer to machine B, and I would like to be able to have the homes of those users on machine B rather than machine A (they should authenticate on machine A anyway). Is this

I have searched for this and the solutions I found were for instances where the workgroup name *was* too long. However, my workgroup name is *not* too long. The spaces between PEGASUS and ^[ are part of the message, I did not add them. If you count them there are 16 total including ending ^[. I can't figure out where the spaces are coming from. This is the same for every Samba

Perhaps a stupid question, but i will give it a try: I have two machines on libvirtd session and network on usermod. Can i (somehow) cross these two machines ? machineA: ip addr add 10.10.10.101/24 dev eth0 ip route add default via 10.10.10.102 dev eth0 machineB: ip addr add 10.10.10.102/24 dev eth0 ip route add default via 10.10.10.101 dev eth0 -- Evaggelos Balaskas - Unix System Engineer

I made a quick change to syslogd(8) so that it can drop root privileges immediately after starting up. It opens up the log sockets (UNIX and network domains) and writes the PID files before dropping privs. It drops privs before openning log files and writing to users. Therefore, you would need to modify your log file permissions appropriately. As for writing to users, ttys generally are writeable

>> From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> >> To: samba at lists.samba.org >> Date: 02/25/2015 02:52 PM >> Subject: Re: [Samba] Workgroup name too long >> Sent by: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org >> >> >> >> Am 25.02.2015 um 22:48 schrieb Miguel Medalha: >>>> I have searched for this and the solutions I found were

Am 25.02.2015 um 22:48 schrieb Miguel Medalha: >> I have searched for this and the solutions I found were for instances >> where the workgroup name *was* too long. However, my workgroup name is >> *not* too long. The spaces between PEGASUS and ^[ are part of the >> message, I did not add them. If you count them there are 16 total >> including ending ^[. I

On machine A I have something like the following in extensions.conf: [iax-extensions] exten => _9.,1,Dial(IAX2/machineB/${EXTEN:1}@mycontext) exten => _9.,2,NoOp(DIALSTATUS=${DIALSTATUS}) exten => _9.,3,Hangup On machineB I have something like this: [mycontext] exten => 2002,1,Dial(SIP/2002,60) exten => 2002,2,NoOp(DIALSTATUS=${DIALSTATUS}) exten => 2002,3,Hangup If I use a

Heya.. Yesterday someone "attacked" by box by connection to several ports.. In other words, a simple portscan.. yet, since my box has "log_in_vain" enabled, so it tries to log everything to /var/log/messages, since the logfile got full and the size went over 100K, it tried to rotate the log to save diskspace. (Apr 16 21:00:00 omikron newsyslog[32137]: logfile turned over due

Hi, This might be a very basic question, but since i''m new to rails, can you please let me kow how to do this. My app is like this i have a menu in the left side which says "Status" and if i click this link i have a static menu displayed like this "MachineA" MachineB" and "MachineC" Upon clicking any of those machines i need to display a bunch of

>> From: schulz at adi.com (Thomas Schulz) >> To: durwin at mgtsciences.com, h.reindl at thelounge.net, > samba at lists.samba.org >> Date: 02/25/2015 06:39 PM >> Subject: Re: [Samba] Workgroup name too long >> Sent by: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org >> >>>> From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> >>>> To: samba at

Has anyone used Agent Forwarding in 3.4p1? We can't seem to get it working under Solaris 2.6 or 8 (Sparc).

Hi folks, I've been working on getting my WiFi network running with IPsec. I'm at the point where all traffic on the wifi subnet is encrypted (i.e. ESP). Then I tried to add AH to the equation. I failed. This picture describes the network setup: http://beta.freebsddiary.org/images/ipsec-wireless.gif Here's what I'm trying and failing with. With these rules, I get no

[ -netters, please Cc me or security@ with replies. ] I'm running into trouble integrating dynamic racoon-based IPSec into a network with ipfw and natd. I need to be able to allow VPN access from any address from authenticated clients. I've got the dynamic VPN working, with racoon negotiating SAs and installing SPs, but the problem is that I can't tell whether an incoming packet on

Hello, I wanted to fit a linear mixed model to a data that is similar in terms of design to the 'Machines' data in 'nlme' package except that each worker (with triplicates) only operates one machine. I created a subset of observations from 'Machines' data such that it looks the same as the data I wanted to fit the model with (see code below). I fitted a model in

Hello list. I would like to get your opinion on what is a safe multi-user environment. The scenario: We would like to offer to some customers of ours some sort of network backup/archive. They would put daily or weekly backups from their local machine on our server using rsync and SSH. Therefore, they all have a user account on our server. However, we must ensure that they would absolutely not be