similar to: hosts allow & WINS

We are experiencing lots of WAN-wide browsing problems, mainly because Local Master Browsers are turned off etc. I got this idea: When clients register their names with the WINS-server (nmbd), why not add that name to the Domain Master Browsers (the same nmbd) browselist? This would make it unneccessary to deal with LMBs. Is this possible to implement? /Peter ?strand

Dear all, I'm setting up a wins server configuration with Samba 3.0.24 ### interfaces = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.1.0/24 bind interfaces only = Yes name resolve order = lmhosts host bcast preferred master = Yes dns proxy = No wins support = Yes ### Before setting dhcp to instruct the clients to use this wins server, I'm trying to make certain it's working correctly. The command:

Hello, I have the following problem with NetBIOS name resolving using nmbd. Here's my configuration: Subnet A (domain A) contains Win95/98/NT and Samba nodes. They can see each other only via broadcast. None of these has WINS enabled. On subnet B (domain B) all nodes have WINS enabled and there is a local master browser for domain B on the net. The WINS server is a Linux 2.2 based router

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, I am writing to ask your help with what may be an nmbd interworking problem. The situation is as described in the samba distribution documenet BROWSING.TXT. I have LANS connected by routers to a central site. FreeBSD 2.2.2R/Samba 1.9.17 nmbds at the remote LAN act as WINS proxy's to a a Samba WINS at the central site. All is well when the WINS proxy samba and the

When I mount a server-share via SMBFS and tries to copy files to it, I get a lot of errors like: "Cannot chmod file XXX". How can i prevent this? PS. Has anybody a WINS-patch for smbmount? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter ?strand <peter@student.liu.se>, http://www.lysator.liu.se/~altic Student in Computer Science and

Hi there...this problem has me banging my head against a wall.... Until last week I was running Samba 2.2.7a on an old Slack box. I decided to upgrade as I needed more drive space and wanted something more current. I went with Fedora Core 2 and am running 2.6.6-1.435 kernel. I was using the default Samba install that came packaged with this release of Fedora and decided to try

I setup the samba server to be a wins server on my network when ever I browse the network it takes for ever to come up and sometimes it takes awhile to even to bring up the share or I don't see them. I am using lmhost on win xp system and the linux system for dns. When ever I do restart on the samba server it gives me this error. (shutting down nmb services ./smb: line 201: kill (6442) - no

Ok folks, the saga continues, but this is an issue that I think should concern all Samba users/sysadmins. It appears to me that Samba is NOT communicating with the WINS server (at least not consistently) for authentication of login requests when a pc tries to get logged in and map a drive letter to a share. In smb.conf I have the following relevant entries: name resolve order = wins host bcast

Ages ago, Chunyan Liu writes: > Tried the patch. It worked. Thanks. Thanks. IMO this patch should be considered for backporting, too. Ian. From 70f4755fba5e6a39e4f8ad55aff2d21f6aa8ff21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:41:46 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] libxl: Do not generate short block in libxl__datacopier_prefixdata

Hello, I am having problems getting nmbd to work as a WINS server. nmblookup fails, as lookups from a PC. If I turn the debugging way up, in the log.nmb, I see: [1999/12/20 18:55:26, 4] libsmb/nmblib.c:debug_nmb_packet(109) nmb packet from 160.101.120.62(44713) header: id=28190 opcode=Query(0) response=No header: flags: bcast=No rec_avail=No rec_des=No trunc=No auth=No header:

My client Windows XP boxes are failing to register with my WINS server (running nmbd from Samba). I'm puzzled how to figure out what I'm doing wrong. Background: I'm setting up BackupPC to back up my Windows clients using rsync. I've installed cwRsync to the clients. BackupPC uses nmblookup to find the client's IP address given its Windows NETBIOS name. I'm

Hi there, does anyone know what following error-message means ? This message returns any 4 minutes for any client in the lan: --> Oct 21 10:03:18 TE-WET01 nmbd[16353]: [2002/10/21 10:03:18, 0] nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(183) Oct 21 10:03:18 TE-WET01 nmbd[16353]: process_name_refresh_request: unicast name registration request received for name

Hi, Problem: When our network has any glitches causing a network time-out for more than a few minutes, our samba servers lose their connectivity with our WINS server even after the network is restored. This causes the WINS server to tombstone the name registration for the samba server(s), thereby causing clients to not connect through the browser. SMB connections are not affected so the

Hi i have a smaal problems ... : I have two samba server connected by a VPN. One, are the master, the config are: [global] workgroup = LOCAL netbios name = SMB1 server string = Linux Smb Server 1 os level = 33 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 500 log level = 3 map to guest = bad user security = user encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file =

Hi, I was wondering I'm going about this in the correct way. I need to test if there are coding sequences or exons in hg19 which match a string of 100bp "D" i.e. [A,G or T]. However I'm getting a strange result. I get a hit on chr7, using the 100bp search however when I search with 60bp sequence of "D" I don't get any hits. library("BSgenome")

from another post today about a different topic, the reply said that nmd has some issue restarting with a service smb restart in redhat 7.3..which seems to answer my question as to why I have to do it twice... thanks > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris McKeever > Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 10:35 AM > To: 'John H Terpstra'; _Chris McKeever_ > Cc:

Bottom posting On 6/21/2018 9:38 AM, adam_xu--- via samba wrote: > Hi, Rowland, I have the same issue too. I can't find any useful info after I ran 'man smbcontrol', could you give us a clearer answer. Thanks. > > > > Yours Adam > > From: Rowland Penny via samba > Date: 2018-06-20 17:40 > To: samba > Subject: Re: [Samba] hosts allow option is not

I am having difficult getting the hosts allow/deny to work with IP ranges or netmasks. Ideally I would prefer to use the IP/Netmask method, e.g. 111.22.33.0/255.255.255.0, because we have a flat ATM network with multiple class C's (netmask is really 255.255.252.0). This, however, doesn't work!! I can't do 111.22.33. either... I can't even do specific IP's, e.g. 111.22.33.44

The included patch adds a new option to the ssh client: -d fd Read the password from file descriptor fd. If you use 0 for fd, the passphrase will be read from stdin. This is basically the same as GPG:s parameter --passphrase-fd. Flames about why this is a bad idea goes into /dev/null. I really need to do this. There are lots of ugly Expect-hacks out there, but I want a more clean

NT_Security.html, included in Samba 2.0.6, says: "There is an NT chown command that will work with Samba and allow a user with Administrator privillage connected to a Samba 2.0.4 server as root to change the ownership of files on both a local NTFS filesystem or remote mounted NTFS or Samba drive. This is available as part of the Seclib NT security library written by Jeremy Allison of the