similar to: Help - VPN w/ linux + samba; cross-subnet browsing and worse :)

Dear Tinc developer, I have some problems connecting to the other site of the VPN Here are my configuration files on pc1 Configuration files on pc2 /usr/local/etc/tinc/tinc.conf /usr/local/etc/tinc/tinc.conf Name = pc1 Name = pc2 TapDevice = /dev/tap0 TapDevice = /dev/tap0 PrivateKeyFile =

Hello Tinc list! I'm trying to set up a Tinc VPN between two KVM host machines so that a VM on one host can communicate with a VM on the other host. While I do have a good bit of experience with virtualization, I'm not a particularly savvy network guy, so this is proving to be a pretty big challenge. Requirements: * ALL VM network traffic must be secure. * VMs on one host must be

I as sending this again in the hopes that someone will respond. Surely I am not the only one with this setup. Thanks, Misty ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [Samba] Cross-subnet browsing and VPN Date: Monday 06 June 2005 09:54 am From: Misty Stanley-Jones <misty@borkholder.com> To: samba@lists.samba.org We have two subnets which both belong to the domain CORP, and

Hi, I have a few questions about the inner workings of netfilter (a graphical layout of my network setup @ https://aequorin.homeunix.net:62389/local/media/network-graph.png) 1) These are the syslog entries for some simple connection tests. Shorewall/netfilter has been set to record all stateful connections SSH is recognized as phys(eth0) -> $FW traffic. This is because PHYSIN is

Hello! Could someone, please, explain to me the meaning of Subnet directive in configuration file of host, because I really don't understand this. http://www.tinc-vpn.org/documentation/tinc_4.html#Configuration "The subnet which this tinc daemon will serve."??? I assign an IP from apropriate subnet to interface, what does it mean "will serve"? I've read

Hi All, I'm having a problem with cross subnet browsing and name resolution across an openvpn tunnel. i've found quite a few people who've had the same on mail lists but none of their fixes have worked. The spec of the setups at both ends of the tunnel are as follows: OS - CentOS 5.5 Samba Version 3.5.4 OpenVPN Version 2.0.9-1 Each server is configured in gateway mode with two NICS,

Hi! I am having some trouble with a samba domain distributed over 2 subnets (192.168.0.0/23 (supernetted) & 192.168.4.0/24). These subnets are linked over the internet through a IPSec gateway to gateway (network to network) connection (i.e. all machines can reach/ping each other on both subnets). The samba PDC (with LDAP backend) has IP 192.168.0.4 and there is a BDC (LDAP slave) in

Voor de duidelijkheid... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 16:14:37 -0500 From: gbarnett <gbarnett@satx.rr.com> To: guus@sliepen.warande.net Subject: TINC 1.0pre2: unable to access one private network Guus... I couldn't seem to get this to the mail list... could you post it and/or answer it for me? Thx. I have been having problems configuring TINC

I have just setup a VPN connection three sites using IPCOP. Everything seems to be talking ok, apart from browsing the network neighborhood. There are no NT/Win2K/XP servers running on any of the sites, all sites are just running win98 pc's using tcp/ip. I have tried configuring all PC's to be on the same workgroup and setup sharing, but still each site can only see the pc's

Hi, I?m fighting with a silly problem: my syslog tells me tinc cannot route a packet. I can use a telnet or the good ol ping, it is the same effect. When I?m pinging from the laptop (172.16.11.2) the network address (172.16.11.0) or any address numerically lower than the laptops address, the packet gets routed, otherwise not. And when I ping the network address, I get the reply twice, as to be

Hi! Me and two friends are trying to get a VPN working, but we cant get routing between two tunnels. This is how it looks, all servers (192.168.*.1) are running IP Masquerade to enable the other computers behind them to access the internet. Both elayne and glenn are connecting to melc, and the tunnel between melc and glenn are running TCPOnly because that glenn doesnt have a public IP (it's

Hello there, I was hoping that maybe one of you guys could help me out with a problem I'm experiencing with tinc1.0pre7. First, I'll start with my configuration, after that I'll explain my problem. Background ---------- This is a simple, client-server situation on a private network. Both machines run the same Debian Woody 3.0 testing installation and both have identical packages

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:10:40PM +0100, Lars Lindstrom wrote: >Hi everyone! > >I have the following requirement: I need to connect a set of Docker >containers to a KVM. The containers shall be isolated in a way that they >cannot communicate to each other without going through the KVM, which >will act as router/firewall. For this, I thought about the following >simple setup

Hello, I already consulted related lists @freebsd.org [1,2] but I have remained unsuccessful to solve the following issue: VPN works for an internal IPv4 subnet, but I doesn't for an internal IPv6 subnet with ULAs. To be honest, I don't have any experience setting up a local IPv6; so I guess that I'm doing something wrong here. For those that know FreeBSD: The main aim is to connect

Hi, Host A has two interfaces: eth0, tap0. I want that all locally generated traffic from user 1004 goes through tap0. This is what I did: iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -m owner --uid-owner 1004 -j MARK --set-mark 2 echo 202 bigmac.out >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables ip rule add fwmark 2 table bigmac.out ip route add default via 10.0.0.1 dev tap0 table bigmac.out ip route flush cache

Hi Ivo and Guus, We are writing a book on building VPNs for Linux and a part of it describes tinc. I wanted to make sure that your opinion, as tinc authors and developers, is reflected. First, let me ask a couple of technical questions. 1. If there are two hosts, foo and bar, that are to be connected via tinc, and each host should only have _one_ IP address (i.e. nmask is /32), would the

Hi Tinc Mailing Group, I've got Tinc-1.0pre3 set up on two Redhat Linux 6.2 / kernel 2.2.18 servers. It compiles okay, it reads the configuration files okay, it makes a valid connection between the two tincd daemons. However, it does not route data from one subnet to the other subnet. I will describe my setup below, and if anyone can suggest why it is not working, can they please reply to put

I have been delighted by tinc. Building a mesh like I need would have been horrible in OpenVPN. tinc makes it easy. I decided to share a workaround for a problem that's been vexing me. Either I'm being dumb (and can do this better with a hint) or this is something others might need. I've been moving a bunch of services from our university to Amazon (EC2). To do this, I bring

I have succeeded in getting two tinc1.0pre3 hosts to connect, but I can't ping one from the other. I can ping the local tap interfaces. tcpdump shows that icmp echo requests are received by the other host, but no replies are sent. The two hosts are North and South. It is the same pinging North to South and South to North. The hosts are configured as follows: South: Debian 2.2

Hi everyone! I have the following requirement: I need to connect a set of Docker containers to a KVM. The containers shall be isolated in a way that they cannot communicate to each other without going through the KVM, which will act as router/firewall. For this, I thought about the following simple setup (as opposed to a more complex one involving a bridge with vlan_filtering and a seperate VLAN